Jump to content

Trying to Salvage a Game (vs. D-RAYS, 7/03)


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 198
  • Created
  • Last Reply

o

 

 

NUMBER 19

 

RENATRAFAENUNEZ

RENATRAFAENUNEZ

RENATRAFAENUNEZ

RENATRAFAENUNEZ

RENATRAFAENUNEZ

RENATRAFAENUNEZ

RENATRAFAENUNEZ

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, atomic said:

And then there are Broxton and Martin,

I might be interesting in keeping Martin if he can be a super utility guy, but not a starter. Plenty of guys won't be here. Broxton for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

NUMBER 19

 

RENATRAFAENUNEZ

 

o

 

 

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

 

Geez, that's a juiced ball.

 

o

 

I guess so ........ I have never seen him do a porno flick.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Sessh said:

No, you shouldn't. Rickard had years to prove he could be a productive major league player. He didn't. He was a known quantity to us and was not part of the future. Broxton is just an experiment that hasn't worked out, but the bloom was off the rose with Rickard. No point in keeping him around. Broxton will follow his lead eventually.

I disagree. Rickard is a known quantity I agree, but Broxton is just bad. His defense is good but his offense is so bad that overall, Rickard remains the better choice.

the only reason to pick up Broxton was his speed, but the other aspects of his game should have been red flags enough to pass on him.

I’m not saying we shouldn’t have Gotten rid of Rickard, but not for Broxton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...