Jump to content

Wieters At It Again


Lucky Jim

Recommended Posts

I don't think it makes much sense to put wear and tear on his knees outside of the major leagues. Spring Training should be it. And as was said, he doesn't need to be in the AFL for hitting, but if you want him there to learn some 1B, I wouldn't have a big problem with that - though I wouldn't be enthusiastic about it.

The only reason to play him at 1B would be if you want him to get more AB's and not wear him out. That clearly is not the case. They know his bat is ready, as is the physical part of his defense. But, there's more to calling a major league game than putting down one finger and catching the ball. It's not like playing the outfield where all you have to do is catch the ball and throw it in. I have no problem if he goes to the AFL and I like the idea of them not using a spot on the 40 man roster until it is necessary. They already lose one with the Matusz signing, no need to clear another player off the roster before you have to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Wieters finished the season today going 2-5 with a 3B and an RBI

His final line for Bowie is a ridiculous: .365/.460/.625/1.085

And total in 437 minor league ABs: .355/.454/.600/1.053 with 22 2B's, 2 3B's, 27 HR, 91 RBI and 82 BB's with only 76 K's.

This guy was clearly a man among boys in 2008 and it would be a travesty to keep him down in the minors to start 2009.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wieters finished the season today going 2-5 with a 3B and an RBI

His final line for Bowie is a ridiculous: .365/.460/.625/1.085

And total in 437 minor league ABs: .355/.454/.600/1.053 with 22 2B's, 2, 3B's, 27 HR, 91 RBI and 82 BB's with only 76 K's.

This guy was clearly a man among boys in 2008 and it would be a travesty to keep him down in the minors to start 2009.

Ridiculous. Congrats to Wieters on an incredible professional debut. I can't wait to see him shine in the big leagues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy was clearly a man among boys in 2008 and it would be a travesty to keep him down in the minors to start 2009.

It would also be a travesty if he was a free agent and left the team after the 2014 season. So if they keep him in the minors for 2 weeks next year, I will have no problem with that whatsoever.

Tremendous season for Wieters. There's no queestion he'll spend most of 2009 in Baltimore. He has to be one of the favorites for Rookie of the Year going into next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His final line for Bowie is a ridiculous: <b> .365/.460/.625/1.085</b>

And total in 437 minor league ABs: <b>.355/.454/.600/1.053 </b> with 22 2B's, 2 3B's, 27 HR, 91 RBI and 82 BB's with only 76 K's.

This guy was clearly a man among boys in 2008 and it would be a travesty to keep him down in the minors to start 2009.

Those are some truely sick (in a good way) numbers. Who do numbers like these compare to in the way of past or present Major League stars...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would also be a travesty if he was a free agent and left the team after the 2014 season. So if they keep him in the minors for 2 weeks next year, I will have no problem with that whatsoever.

Tremendous season for Wieters. There's no queestion he'll spend most of 2009 in Baltimore. He has to be one of the favorites for Rookie of the Year going into next year.

2 weeks in April 2009 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Entire season 2015

I can't say this enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would also be a travesty if he was a free agent and left the team after the 2014 season. So if they keep him in the minors for 2 weeks next year, I will have no problem with that whatsoever.

If the team is good enough, Wieters will want to stay just like Varitek did with the Sox. So if we want to keep Wieters we'll have to compete. I have no problem with that. If this team isn't good enough in 2014, then the Orioles don't deserve to keep him IMO. And Texas didn't make out too badly on a Teixeira trade so if we have to trade Wieters, I'm sure we could get a ransom for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the team is good enough, Wieters will want to stay just like Varitek did with the Sox. So if we want to keep Wieters we'll have to compete. I have no problem with that.

And if the O's play it right he will not get to make that decision until 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the team is good enough, Wieters will want to stay just like Varitek did with the Sox. So if we want to keep Wieters we'll have to compete. I have no problem with that.

Yep. We'll have to compete, we'll have to win that competition, and we'll end up paying about $5 mm + extra for that 2015 season compared to what we'll have to pay him if we keep him in the minors next season for 2 weeks. Not exactly brilliant long-term planning if you ask me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those are some truely sick (in a good way) numbers. Who do numbers like these compare to in the way of past or present Major League stars...

Matt Wieters (22)(A+/AA) - .355/.454/.600/1.053

Lance Berkman (22)(AA/AAA) - .302/.418/.566/.984

Mark Teixeira (22)(A+/AA) - .318/.403/.592/.995

Albert Pujols (20)(A+/AA/AAA) - .314/.373/.543/.916

Carlos Lee (22)(AA) - .302/.349/.485/.834

Manny Ramirez (21)(AA/AAA) - .333/.419/.613/1.032

Mike Piazza (23)(AA/AAA) - .350/.412/.587/.999

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep. We'll have to compete, we'll have to win that competition, and we'll end up paying about $5 mm + extra for that 2015 season compared to what we'll have to pay him if we keep him in the minors next season for 2 weeks. Not exactly brilliant long-term planning if you ask me.

What you do is you sign him to the biggest long term contract ever given to a rookie player, beating Longoria's deal about a month into the season. Then you've locked him up for 2-3 of his FA years. Boras wouldn't turn down a record breaking deal for a rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you do is you sign him to the biggest long term contract ever given to a rookie player, beating Longoria's deal about a month into the season. Then you've locked him up for 2-3 of his FA years. Boras wouldn't turn down a record breaking deal for a rookie.

Well, I'd offer that to him if I was the Orioles. But, of course, the Longoria deal was done after they'd first held him in the minors for the time necessary to avoid having him become a free agent after 2014. And as to whether Boras would advise his client to sign a long-term deal as a rookie, I don't know about that. He has a pretty long history of telling his players to hold out for free agency, and then getting amazing results for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Wieters (22)(A+/AA) - .355/.454/.600/1.053

Lance Berkman (22)(AA/AAA) - .302/.418/.566/.984

Mark Teixeira (22)(A+/AA) - .318/.403/.592/.995

Albert Pujols (20)(A+/AA/AAA) - .314/.373/.543/.916

Carlos Lee (22)(AA) - .302/.349/.485/.834

Manny Ramirez (21)(AA/AAA) - .333/.419/.613/1.032

Mike Piazza (23)(AA/AAA) - .350/.412/.587/.999

That is an impressive group of players to be included in...Rep 2 you Jtrea...:clap3:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I agree with this. The unfortunate part of that is it typically takes leaving to figure that part out. Most of us lack that ability to “recognize what we have” and resist the other.   With all that being said, I’m not sure that concept necessarily applies here. He could certainly move on, get the bag, and land in a place with good people and good opportunity.
    • It’s more than just not being Angelos.    People see the resources this group has relative to the Angelos family.  The stage of life many in the group are in. There’s a lot of people around the city with connections to the ownership group and you hear a very consistent theme of what the group is looking to do.  
    • Imagine the shame of that player, always having an asteroid attached to his achievement in the history books.
    • Can we implement some sort of paragraph policy around here?
    • I'll be honest, wasn't on my radar until this post. I went back and watched his outing and all of your observations are right on in my opinion. Lots of swing and miss and definitely not a195 pounds lol. Has had command problem in past but not this outing.  I'll see what I an dig up about him but would be nice to have velo. 
    • He's top ten for me easy. The real question is whether he's the team's best pitching prospect or not? Povich has it right now due to his success in AAA, but nobody brings the stuff that DeLeon brings consistently in the system. He's a taller Cionel Perez with a changeup.
    • Ha, I know you love your boy!   He is improving but while he's "versatile" in that he has experience at a lot of positions, he's not really good at any of them. He reminds me a bit of Rick Short but shorty was a better hitter overall albeit with a little less power than Cook. I still think he's an org guy but he may at some point work his way into a major league bench one day. There are worse guys who played in the majors for sure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...