Jump to content

We are Number Eight


weams

Recommended Posts

It's nice to see the farm this highly ranked.

Rutschman finally gives the system the star power it lacked, plus Hall and Rodriguez have climbed. A lot more depth and quality than in years past.

With probably another top 3 pick next year, I think competitive balance A pick, and finally being active internationally, I think the system could move even higher the next two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, survivedc said:

Exactly. Pretty sure all the prospects worth getting excited about were brought in by Elias in his 7 months with the team.

You're forgetting the pitchers that were drafted in the DD regime.  Hall, Rodriguez, Baumann, Lowther, Knight and now even Sedlock, who has seen his stock rise.   Zach Pop may have seen the majors at the end of this year if not for the TJ surgery, and Kremer is looking like he's still a solid prospect.  

Now, I will say that the new regime has given these guys the tools that they lacked, namely analytics.  But DD and John Wasdin did a fantastic job in the 2017 and 2018 drafts in getting the pitching here.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, But, but....Peter still has the team....so no chance....and Hunter is a homer....and Palmer can praise the Yankees and it's OK because he's in the HOF and is above criticism. 

Seriously, this is great news!  That dominance from the Bowie guys has to have had an impact.  I believe in Elias!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ThomasTomasz said:

You're forgetting the pitchers that were drafted in the DD regime.  Hall, Rodriguez, Baumann, Lowther, Knight and now even Sedlock, who has seen his stock rise.   Zach Pop may have seen the majors at the end of this year if not for the TJ surgery, and Kremer is looking like he's still a solid prospect.  

Now, I will say that the new regime has given these guys the tools that they lacked, namely analytics.  But DD and John Wasdin did a fantastic job in the 2017 and 2018 drafts in getting the pitching here.  

Some of them like Wells may have been good anyway, but the analytics has to have had an impact.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ThomasTomasz said:

You're forgetting the pitchers that were drafted in the DD regime.  Hall, Rodriguez, Baumann, Lowther, Knight and now even Sedlock, who has seen his stock rise.   Zach Pop may have seen the majors at the end of this year if not for the TJ surgery, and Kremer is looking like he's still a solid prospect.  

Now, I will say that the new regime has given these guys the tools that they lacked, namely analytics.  But DD and John Wasdin did a fantastic job in the 2017 and 2018 drafts in getting the pitching here.  

Yeah sorry my post was 100% sarcastic. 

On a serious note, some good outfield prospects and at least one good MI prospect to add to the pitching. DD had some solid drafts.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, survivedc said:

Exactly. Pretty sure all the prospects worth getting excited about were brought in by Elias in his 7 months with the team.

Not quite, but the moves within the organization and how they are stacked currently is what makes this so new. DD brought in some decent prospects,  but their development was always haphazard. It appears to be more smoothly organized and deliberate with Elias and company. The dividends are paying out as we watch.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much I as disliked DD, I think he deserves credit for two things regarding our farm system ranking.  First, the trades last season of Schoop, Britton, Gausman and Manny provided some good prospects and shed significant payroll.  As Gausman has blown up and been injured this year, one hears less complaining about that trade.  Kremer, Zimmerman and Diaz highlight the overall group, but that group certainly provides depth to our system and is probably responsible for putting us in the top 10 (though several pieces can make that claim depending on how one looks at it).

Second, DD did hire Gary Rajsich.  I know that Elias has his research and that research favors drafting certain players, but GaryR, despite all of the forfeited and traded draft picks courtesy of DD, drafted well.  I thought Elias should have kept Rajsich and I wonder if that might eventually be a regret of our current GM.

It is nice to see our system get this recognition and guys like McKenna turn their season around and guys like Baumann reach new heights.  BTW, I think this is only the beginning.  We will be in the talent accumulation phase for another two years and I think folks are going to be amazed at the overall depth our system compared to past Baltimore versions.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Philip said:

Did he?

So you're saying that the team moved from somewhere around 25th or 28th in the rankings to 8th or 12th solely on the basis of players acquired in the last eight months?  That seems kind of unlikely.  Development of players already here, drafted or otherwise acquired in the Duquette era, have to be some of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I doubt Ortiz will have an 800+ OPS all year but I guess its possible. Right now the trade looks like a win for both teams. Milwaukee of course gets 5 more years after this to fully reap the benefits. 
    • Probably because of pitch count. Doesn’t change my point. 
    • Robert would be a significant upgrade over Mullins (offensively). Not sure how much of a difference the two have defensively. But as much as I like Mullins, he has been really bad with the bat in his hand for about a season now. Second half of last season and most of the first half of this season. Obviously the issue with Robert is his health/availability, so there would be risk there. But I wouldn't mind if Elias took a swing there, as long as this wouldn't be his only move. I would like to see Elias act bold and decisively this go round (at the deadline). I heard that the CHI SOX wanted a "Soto like" package (that the Nats got for trading him to the Pads) back for Robert. We know that they have a recent history of over asking on players they are in theory willing to trade. Anybody have a guess on what the realistic costs for Robert would be?
    • This is all correct. And to add to it, If Gunnar only continues being this version of Gunnar, he is out-valued only by the sole two-way player in baseball (Ohtani). So, comparing Soto to Gunnar in a vacuum might make some sense, their situations are vastly different. The closeness of the young guys has been well documented and we know that the group of Adley, Gunnar, Mountcastle, Stowers, Westy and Cowser are all strong in their faith. I do believe that will play some part in the contract finagling. I do not know any of them personally and with the union, the pressure of the sport, endorsements, etc. etc. ... I realize that at the end of the day guys are going to want what they are worth but I have long thought two things about this crop of players: they are incredibly consistent but they also seem to be genuinely good kids who want to win and put the team first. We don't know yet what will happen over the next few years with these players but I wouldn't be surprised to see a version of what the cast of Friends did early in the show's run, where they essentially formed their own union of sorts and structured their compensation so that none of them would become bigger than the sum of their parts. Again, I don't know them personally and I am fully in-tune with the idea that they all want to be paid but I think that their closeness means more to them than Soto's relationship with his teammates in Washington, and I think that holds true with respect to almost literally any other free agent in the history of the game. They are very unique in that they have this young group who are all 23 - 27 right now who are very tight. I happen to think that the stars of this team will be more inclined to consider more team-friendly deals if it means that their posse can stay in-tact for a longer duration of time. Call me naïve but that's how I see it. I've been intimately involved in the game at various levels myself and I can honestly say that I can't remember a group of young players who demonstrated a caring for each other to the same level of these kids. It could mean nothing when Gunnar is being thrown half a billion dollars or when Adley is offered the moon but I just don't see these players being as motivated by money as other (especially recent) stars.  I agree 100% that Gunnar would jump all over that Witt Jr. deal. I think he is smart enough to know that anything could happen over the next five years. Plus $288 million is a shitload of money. I don't know how  many generations of wealth that is but damn that's a lot of money for a soon to be 23 year old kid.   
    • There is a lot to like and I can't see why nobody would want him but for the possibility that he won't help the team much in October 2024, the cost would probably be an absurd ask.
    • I think the focus is going to be on relief pitching.   I don't think any of the guys SG listed would be needed for the types of relievers the O's will be going after.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...