Jump to content

I really want to keep Villar (Update: Traded to Marlins for LHS Easton Lucas)


AceKing

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

 

Not the best comparison. DJ was/is an incredible defender. Villar is below average. Also, it's hard not to look at this season as a bit of an outlier because Villar has largely been a 1.0ish WAR guy for the bulk of his career. To me, this feels a lot like Andrew Cashner going into free agency coming off his 3.40 era 2017 season. The only team that believed in his ability to duplicate that success was the Orioles. I'm curious to see if the league buys into Villar's season. My gut tells me they won't. 

Yeah but, this isn't his walk year. So not quite apples to apples compared to Cashner. 

Edited by Bubble Buddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildbillhiccup said:

 

Not the best comparison. DJ was/is an incredible defender. Villar is below average. Also, it's hard not to look at this season as a bit of an outlier because Villar has largely been a 1.0ish WAR guy for the bulk of his career. To me, this feels a lot like Andrew Cashner going into free agency coming off his 3.40 era 2017 season. The only team that believed in his ability to duplicate that success was the Orioles. I'm curious to see if the league buys into Villar's season. My gut tells me they won't. 

I wouldn’t value Villar based solely on his 2019 season, but I don’t see how he’s been a 1.0ish WAR guy for the bulk of his career.    In the last four years he’s been at 3.9, 0.1,  2.7 and 3.4 (with a month to play). If you’re looking for an outlier season in there, this year’s not it!   That said, Villar is certainly not as good as LeMahieu.    He’s also not a free agent this offseason, so I’m not sure what we’re really talking about here.    I imagine if he was a free agent this offseason, he’d command somewhere between 2/$16 mm and 3/$30 mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LA2 said:

CoC's comparison of Villar to the signings of Hardy and Roberts is far-fetched (especially if one factors in age, as you have pointed out), but I don't quite understand your reasoning here.

1. Yes, Hardy had had some injuries before coming to Baltimore, but he recovered and put in several stellar seasons. Resigning him once new injuries and age clearly made it difficult for him to play well was a foolish decision, as CoC implied. Don't quite understand why you think a history of pre-Oriole injuries can serve as an alibi.

2. Where did you got the fascinating idea that B-Rob intentionally gave himself a concussion?

Well ...When you intentionally break a bat over your own head, a concussion should be the least of what you expect to happen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quote

 

 

 
Oct 21, 2014 - Brian Roberts | Professional Baseball Player After a strikeout in a 2010 game, Roberts banged his bat against his helmet and sustained his first concussion. .

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&channel=cus&q=brian+roberts+concussion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I wouldn’t value Villar based solely on his 2019 season, but I don’t see how he’s been a 1.0ish WAR guy for the bulk of his career.    In the last four years he’s been at 3.9, 0.1,  2.7 and 3.4 (with a month to play). If you’re looking for an outlier season in there, this year’s not it!   That said, Villar is certainly not as good as LeMahieu.    He’s also not a free agent this offseason, so I’m not sure what we’re really talking about here.    I imagine if he was a free agent this offseason, he’d command somewhere between 2/$16 mm and 3/$30 mm.

What am I missing here? i see two years with a 3+ WAR and 5 years of a WAR of .5, .7, .8, .2 and .9/1.4. I've said this before, but he appears to be more of an accumulator than a good player. We've also been down this road before with Villar. He basically had the same season in 2016 and crapped the bed the next season. And the Brewers weren't even confident enough in his ability to give him everyday ABs that next season. That speaks volumes (to me). 

 

Year Age Tm Lg G PA Rbat Rbaser Rdp Rfield Rpos RAA WAA Rrep RAR WAR waaWL% 162WL% oWAR dWAR oRAR Salary Pos Awards
2013 22 HOU AL 58 241 -6 0 0 -5 3 -8 -0.8 9 1 0.0 .485 .495 0.5 -0.1 6   6  
2014 23 HOU AL 87 289 -11 3 1 -2 4 -5 -0.5 10 5 0.5 .493 .496 0.7 0.3 7 $503,800 6/D  
2015 24 HOU AL 53 128 2 0 0 1 1 4 0.4 5 8 0.9 .508 .502 0.8 0.2 7   65/7D48  
2016 25 MIL NL 156 679 12 -1 1 0 7 20 1.8 21 41 3.9 .513 .512 3.9 0.7 41 $512,900 654  
2017 26 MIL NL 122 436 -14 -1 2 -1 3 -12 -1.3 14 2 0.1 .490 .493 0.2 0.1 3 $554,500 4/8D  
2018 27 MIL NL 87 279 -2 2 -1 5 2 5 0.5 9 15 1.4 .507 .504 0.9 0.7 9 $2,550,000 4  
2018 27 BAL AL 54 236 1 3 0 -1 2 4 0.5 8 13 1.3 .508 .503 1.4 0.2 14   46  
2019 28 BAL AL 133 578 9 4 2 -9 6 13 1.4 20 33 3.4 .509 .508 4.2 -0.1 42 $4,825,000 *4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

What am I missing here? i see two years with a 3+ WAR and 5 years of a WAR of .5, .7, .8, .2 and .9/1.4. I've said this before, but he appears to be more of an accumulator than a good player. We've also been down this road before with Villar. He basically had the same season in 2016 and crapped the bed the next season. And the Brewers weren't even confident enough in his ability to give him everyday ABs that next season. That speaks volumes (to me). 

 

Year Age Tm Lg G PA Rbat Rbaser Rdp Rfield Rpos RAA WAA Rrep RAR WAR waaWL% 162WL% oWAR dWAR oRAR Salary Pos Awards
2013 22 HOU AL 58 241 -6 0 0 -5 3 -8 -0.8 9 1 0.0 .485 .495 0.5 -0.1 6   6  
2014 23 HOU AL 87 289 -11 3 1 -2 4 -5 -0.5 10 5 0.5 .493 .496 0.7 0.3 7 $503,800 6/D  
2015 24 HOU AL 53 128 2 0 0 1 1 4 0.4 5 8 0.9 .508 .502 0.8 0.2 7   65/7D48  
2016 25 MIL NL 156 679 12 -1 1 0 7 20 1.8 21 41 3.9 .513 .512 3.9 0.7 41 $512,900 654  
2017 26 MIL NL 122 436 -14 -1 2 -1 3 -12 -1.3 14 2 0.1 .490 .493 0.2 0.1 3 $554,500 4/8D  
2018 27 MIL NL 87 279 -2 2 -1 5 2 5 0.5 9 15 1.4 .507 .504 0.9 0.7 9 $2,550,000 4  
2018 27 BAL AL 54 236 1 3 0 -1 2 4 0.5 8 13 1.3 .508 .503 1.4 0.2 14   46  
2019 28 BAL AL 133 578 9 4 2 -9 6 13 1.4 20 33 3.4 .509 .508 4.2 -0.1 42 $4,825,000 *4

Frobby is correct. What you're missing is that you're looking at his oWAR and not his WAR. What you're also missing is his 2018 stats are split into two separate lines which you aren't adding together to make one number I guess because typing .9/1.4 makes your argument look better than putting 2.3, but again that's his oWAR; he had a 2.7 WAR for that season. So, his WAR over the last four seasons are 3.9, 0.1, 2.7 and 3.4 so far this season. If you didn't have such an axe to grind with Villar, you wouldn't be in such a rush to find some numbers to support your argument even if they're the wrong numbers or you have to misrepresent those numbers.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

What am I missing here? i see two years with a 3+ WAR and 5 years of a WAR of .5, .7, .8, .2 and .9/1.4. I've said this before, but he appears to be more of an accumulator than a good player. We've also been down this road before with Villar. He basically had the same season in 2016 and crapped the bed the next season. And the Brewers weren't even confident enough in his ability to give him everyday ABs that next season. That speaks volumes (to me). 

 

Year Age Tm Lg G PA Rbat Rbaser Rdp Rfield Rpos RAA WAA Rrep RAR WAR waaWL% 162WL% oWAR dWAR oRAR Salary Pos Awards
2013 22 HOU AL 58 241 -6 0 0 -5 3 -8 -0.8 9 1 0.0 .485 .495 0.5 -0.1 6   6  
2014 23 HOU AL 87 289 -11 3 1 -2 4 -5 -0.5 10 5 0.5 .493 .496 0.7 0.3 7 $503,800 6/D  
2015 24 HOU AL 53 128 2 0 0 1 1 4 0.4 5 8 0.9 .508 .502 0.8 0.2 7   65/7D48  
2016 25 MIL NL 156 679 12 -1 1 0 7 20 1.8 21 41 3.9 .513 .512 3.9 0.7 41 $512,900 654  
2017 26 MIL NL 122 436 -14 -1 2 -1 3 -12 -1.3 14 2 0.1 .490 .493 0.2 0.1 3 $554,500 4/8D  
2018 27 MIL NL 87 279 -2 2 -1 5 2 5 0.5 9 15 1.4 .507 .504 0.9 0.7 9 $2,550,000 4  
2018 27 BAL AL 54 236 1 3 0 -1 2 4 0.5 8 13 1.3 .508 .503 1.4 0.2 14   46  
2019 28 BAL AL 133 578 9 4 2 -9 6 13 1.4 20 33 3.4 .509 .508 4.2 -0.1 42 $4,825,000 *4

You clearly don’t like him as a player; that’s been evident to anyone who’s read your posts over this season.    That’s fine, and you’re entitled to your opinion.    But as to the WAR part of this discussion:

Age 22: 0.0 in 241 PA

Age 23: 0.5 in 289 PA

Age 24: 0.9 in 128 PA

Age 25: 3.6 in 679 PA

Age 26: 0.1 in 436 PA

Age 27: 2.7 in 515 PA

Age 28: 3.4 in 578 PA (with a month left)

I do not put as much weight on his age 22-24 seasons when he was still getting his feet wet and was a part time player.    But even if I did, simple math says that 11.2 WAR divided by 7 seasons equals 1.6 WAR, not 1.0ish.  1.6 would be understating his probable value over the next few years, given any reasonable weighting of his past and current results.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sessh said:

Frobby is correct. What you're missing is that you're looking at his oWAR and not his WAR. What you're also missing is his 2018 stats are split into two separate lines which you aren't adding together to make one number I guess because typing .9/1.4 makes your argument look better than putting 2.3, but again that's his oWAR; he had a 2.7 WAR for that season. So, his WAR over the last four seasons are 3.9, 0.1, 2.7 and 3.4 so far this season. If you didn't have such an axe to grind with Villar, you wouldn't be in such a rush to find some numbers to support your argument even if they're the wrong numbers or you have to misrepresent those numbers.

The defensive stats that fuel our arguments are not solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, weams said:

The defensive stats that fuel our arguments are not solid.

So I guess you’re going to bring up this point every time WAR is mentioned in a post?    It is clear the defensive component is not as reliable as the offensive one, but I’d still say it’s better than nothing.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Frobby said:

So I guess you’re going to bring up this point every time WAR is mentioned in a post?    It is clear the defensive component is not as reliable as the offensive one, but I’d still say it’s better than nothing.  

I think that until such time as there is a revision, that gross statement using different brands of WAR need to be qualified as less than definitive discussion enders. That's all. It will be better soon. They'll get real stats to quantify.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, weams said:

I think that until such time as there is a revision, that gross statement using different brands of WAR need to be qualified as less than definitive discussion enders. That's all. It will be better soon. They'll get real stats to quantify.  

I’m good with that.   I know it will make Moose happy.    

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, weams said:

I think that until such time as there is a revision, that gross statement using different brands of WAR need to be qualified as less than definitive discussion enders. That's all. It will be better soon. They'll get real stats to quantify.  

So what about Villar's flawed defensive metrics makes his value as implied by WAR off?  Is he dramatically better or worse than he appears by that view?  Or is he a typical case where the defensive metrics just have a somewhat higher margin of error than the others and we're not quite sure, but it's not a game changer unless we're really missing something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

So what about Villar's flawed defensive metrics makes his value as implied by WAR off?  Is he dramatically better or worse than he appears by that view?  Or is he a typical case where the defensive metrics just have a somewhat higher margin of error than the others and we're not quite sure, but it's not a game changer unless we're really missing something?

See, we don't know what we don't know.  We may be missing something or Derek Jeter may have been the Wizard instead of the Captain.  Right now it is Savage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...