Jump to content

Is Sisco Toast?


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

Early in a complete rebuild, why do we not take a deep breath, swallow hard and go with Severino at C until our #1 pick gets up here. Most every position on the team needs new people, so let's focus on the positions where we may not have the good help coming, unlike C where good help s/b coming soon. And pray that the team is not allowed to be run into the ground like this team was for years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

So it’s Steve ‘s fault he has been playing out of position? 

On this team he certainly could be. Not as a CF. 

My issue is folks dumping on Sisco while letting other players, who are doing even worse, slide.

Now that Stewart has started hitting a bit folks are going back to their default punching bag.

No need for a reactionary rant about Sisco.  No new ground was being covered. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

My issue is folks dumping on Sisco while letting other players, who are doing even worse, slide.

Now that Stewart has started hitting a bit folks are going back to their default punching bag.

No need for a reactionary rant about Sisco.  No new ground was being covered. 

You are right, last night was nothing new. That is the problem. Sisco has been given chances to improve and has made zero progress. There hadn't been a thread on Sisco in a while, so I figured I would start one and see how others are assessing his progress.

Other guys being bad does not make Sisco any better. Arguably,  he is arguably the worst defensive player on the team. -6 DRS in only 47 games. That is certainly Mancini and Nunez level of bad, and I think the board is pretty consistent in calling out their defense as well as Villar, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

My issue is folks dumping on Sisco while letting other players, who are doing even worse, slide.

Now that Stewart has started hitting a bit folks are going back to their default punching bag.

No need for a reactionary rant about Sisco.  No new ground was being covered. 

I dump on sloppy plays and players. Villar, Alberto, Núñez, Davis, Everybody makes a sloppy play is a subject. And I’m not very keen on Stewart, either. The problem with sisco is that the other guys aren’t necessarily bad all the time, but he is, and he’s embarrassing. He just can’t throw, he can’t tag, he can’t do much of anything where catching is concerned, And he was our second round pick.

He has gotten his strike out rate down to 30% and it had been close to 50%, and I give him credit for an improving eye, But it’s pretty clear that he was a waste of a pick.

You are correct that at this point in The teams time frame, a bad catcher is not much of an issue. But I agree with the people who say Severino should be our catcher and Sisco should be the back up, and as soon as one of our developing guys is ready we should outright Sisco Until he can learn another position.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Philip said:

I dump on sloppy plays and players. Villar, Alberto, Núñez, Davis, Everybody makes a sloppy play is a subject. And I’m not very keen on Stewart, either. The problem with sisco is that the other guys aren’t necessarily bad all the time, but he is, and he’s embarrassing. He just can’t throw, he can’t tag, he can’t do much of anything where catching is concerned, And he was our second round pick.

He has gotten his strike out rate down to 30% and it had been close to 50%, and I give him credit for an improving eye, But it’s pretty clear that he was a waste of a pick.

You are correct that at this point in The teams time frame, a bad catcher is not much of an issue. But I agree with the people who say Severino should be our catcher and Sisco should be the back up, and as soon as one of our developing guys is ready we should outright Sisco Until he can learn another position.

I've said it before but I guess I'll have to repeat myself.

If you think a second round pick that makes it to the majors was a waste of a pick you don't understand the MLB draft.

You want to see what a wasted draft pick looks like?

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=hart--001jos

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I've said it before but I guess I'll have to repeat myself.

If you think a second round pick that makes it to the majors was a waste of a pick you don't understand the MLB draft.

You want to see what a wasted draft pick looks like?

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=hart--001jos

Remember, to be a good draft pick you have to be in the 90th or 95th percentile.  If you're in the 75th percentile you're a bum you should have stopped playing in high school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Remember, to be a good draft pick you have to be in the 90th or 95th percentile.  If you're in the 75th percentile you're a bum you should have stopped playing in high school.

Second round picks should be perennial all-stars. 

Getting to the majors at 22 isn't impressive at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

...should have stopped playing in high school.

That's the 29 year old having repeated AA without making the 40 man roster. Two Kids. Wife going to school.  That's the guy. 

But we still dream on him as long as affiliated ball will have him.  It's only 800 or so that are real professional baseball players.  But union minimum is good work if you can make that hurdle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I'm literally shaking my head.  Kid makes it to the majors at 22 and some guy is calling him a wasted draft pick.

Bubba Starling went fifth, in a loaded draft, made his debut at 26 and has -.6rWAR.

61st overall picks should be starting in the NFL for years and years.  Not hanging out on the practice squad for five or six seasons like Sisco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, eddie83 said:

So why is it an issue that Sisco’s defense is a topic? I just think people were hoping for some improvement this year with the glove. I thought early on there was some modest things that were better. Overall I just don’t see enough. 

Once again I am fine with him playing. 

What types of defensive metrics are we attempting to evaluate Chance with? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • What do you mean starting for Slater? He is not a starter. The Ragans matchup makes things interesting because he has reverse splits. I don't know the numbers but they need to start the guys with good numbers vs Ragans and/or LHP changeups, whether they are LH or RH.
    • Perhaps. I'm just saying he could stop the Chiefs, the Raiders disaster, and the Cowboys debacle certainly gave me pause.  Last night they certainly looked better, but the first 3 games gave me pause. I think we'll know more after a full season.
    • 1. If the Orioles had signed Jack Flaherty, Seth Lugo and Chris Sale to bolster our pitching staff last off-season, this place would have gone ballistic, and not in a good way. 2.  The Orioles ended the regular season last year flat as a pancake, and it carried into the offseason.  This year, while under the pressure of trying to keep up with the Yankees, the team struggled mightily to find consistent offense and any overall consistency.  Once that pressure waned with us knowing our destiny, guys seemed to loosen up, and we saw the offense come back.  I thought that might happen.  However, my question is, after laying an egg in the playoffs last year and recent struggles despite the last two series, does the pressure of the postseason put us back in the funk we saw throughout most of August and September? 3.  I've seen a consistent theme in this forum over the past week or two which is this:  "All we have to do is get hot at the right time, like Texas did last year."  While I agree that's true, and want us to be that team this year, isn't that statement kind of an admission that without getting hot, we're not good enough on our own merits to persevere in the tournament?  And before I get crucified for saying that, I'll point to what everyone has witnessed in recent months:  Bad/inconsistent bullpen, inconsistent offense, questions about our starting pitching, defensive lapses and being prone to not showing up offensively.  And please, let's not act like some, or all of these, don't exist.   That all being said, Go O's!!!!!  Let's get hot!!
    • All of the October ones will.    Tomorrow good chance to be the least important one if things go any kind of good. Granted ~40% chance it is the only one, but that is short series baseball, not him. I won't have warm feelings if he handles these guys but is bad twice the next series.
    • Would be upsetting to start Slater in any playoff game at this point. Even if you think Mullins/Cowser cant hit LHP (news flash Slater cant either)- keep the defense and the guys who "got you there"
    • If the point was "Skubal is better" you kind of proved that for them. More innings, more K's, less ER, less Walks, less hits, better W/L. Across the board. Ragans is very very very good- but Skubal is better, and the runaway for AL Cy Young. Either is capable of shutting down an offense- and Ragans did just that earlier this year. But we also roughed up Ragans in the other start. No matter who we face, we're going to find things that make it tough, its the playoffs. Lets keep playing good ball and get payback for 2014. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...