Jump to content

Brady Anderson leaving organization


eddie83

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Sure, once they:

  1. Cut Davis
  2. Spend their full allotment on International players

At that point I'll believe he actually has full control.

I don’t know that any GM truly has “full control”. 

Davis could also be Elias way of tanking. I kid a little, have to see how long leash is next year. 

How short are they this year?

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I don’t know that any GM truly has “full control”. 

Davis could also be Elias way of tanking. I kid a little, have to see how long leash is next year. 

How short are they this year?

Hard to tell. 

This is old but I haven't seen any updates.

https://www.mlb.com/orioles/news/international-prospect-signings-july-2-2019

Quote

Luis Gonzalez, OF, Dominican Republic -- $475,000
Luis Ortiz, LHP, Dominican Republic -- $400,000
Leonel Sanchez, INF, Dominican Republic -- $400,000

While it is encouraging that they spent 400K+ on three players the total pool is $6,481,200.  I guess they still have at least half of that left when you add in the less highly regarded players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Hard to tell. 

This is old but I haven't seen any updates.

https://www.mlb.com/orioles/news/international-prospect-signings-july-2-2019

While it is encouraging that they spent 400K+ on three players the total pool is $6,481,200.  I guess they still have at least half of that left when you add in the less highly regarded players.

Hopefully next year some higher impact players will be possible. May have to wait until 2021.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

 The first major article I ever read at orioles hang out was “orioles Game of Thrones“ and one of the takeaways from that article was the sense that Brady gave himself credit for many things that he shouldn’t, and he was one of those people who knew everything and couldn’t be taught. I am glad he is sailing into the sunset.

It ended up that Duquette, Buck and Brady all lost in the end. Who knew Elias was Bran all along? ;)

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

This remains your goofiest take ever on the Hangout. It has been explained multiple times that it takes at least two years to get into that market because the best players have had deals for one or two years before the signing period. What do want Elias to do, just spend money to spend money?

He has full control (outside of releasing Davis) and has the ability to spend the allotment when he can get in on the top level talent. The Latin American scouting and signing process is the moist corrupt and ridiculous thing that any major league sport allows. It's not just something you turn on in the first year, even with a respected lead in Koby Perez.

 

And yet the Rays swooped in and grabbed that player that was linked to the Yankees when the Yankees had trouble trading for more slots.

If every other team can find ways to spend the money it makes no sense that the O's can't.  The Orioles traded away a ton of slots last year after the July 2nd kids were gone.  Obviously other teams felt there was value to be had beyond the high profile kids with pre-existing deals.

Are you fine with the O's only spending say 3M this year?  Is that enough progress for you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

And yet the Rays swooped in and grabbed that player that was linked to the Yankees when the Yankees had trouble trading for more slots.

If every other team can find ways to spend the money it makes no sense that the O's can't.  The Orioles traded away a ton of slots last year after the July 2nd kids were gone.  Obviously other teams felt there was value to be had beyond the high profile kids with pre-existing deals.

Are you fine with the O's only spending say 3M this year?  Is that enough progress for you?

There is no way to determine by the amount they spend right now because I don't know the talent available or if the Orioles were on them. I will say this, if the Orioles aren't in or signing some major guys by the 2021 signing period then I'll start to have concerns. I expect next year they will have a couple of bigger signings. By 2021 they should have been there long enough to be in on some top guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate the loyalty and passion that Brady has had for the Orioles organization.    I think it’s best that he’s moving on, but didn’t think he really was in a position to interfere with Elias anyway.    His departure is more symbolic than anything substantive IMO.

He was a great player for this organization and I do think he improved our conditioning programs considerably over the last decade.    I wish him well in whatever he decides to do next.   

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

There is no way to determine by the amount they spend right now because I don't know the talent available or if the Orioles were on them. I will say this, if the Orioles aren't in or signing some major guys by the 2021 signing period then I'll start to have concerns. I expect next year they will have a couple of bigger signings. By 2021 they should have been there long enough to be in on some top guys.

I don't think it is at all "goofy" for me to be skeptical that the sons will allow Elias to spend 6M+ on International players given what we know about the team's past behavior.  I think the O's are very much in a money saving mode and that might extend to limiting Elias' budget in some areas beyond ML payroll.

I certainly don't think it should take three years to get where every other team is at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...