Jump to content

How long before Elias promotes the young starters at AAA?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

McKenna and Diaz spend all of 2020 in Norfolk. Mountcastle and Akin stay at least until the O's get an extra year. Hays should break with the team. Mountcastle I think shuffles between DH and 1B with Mancini because we have LF options in Stewart and Santander, and RF will probably be one of those two to start out the year. This thinking comes with me also thinking that Mancini or Nunez will most likely be traded. BP wise and SP wise outside of Akin, everyone from bowie in 2019 is probably going to sit there and develop unless they blow the door down. There's no reason to rush anyone up. We'll have some depth signed, but that's kinda it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I meant if Mountcastle's defense is slightly worse than Mancini's defense in the 2020 season does it make a difference?

Not sure how you got pitching out of that.

It makes no difference at all.   Unless Mancini is traded, Mountcastle is at Norfolk.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Davis sits.  Marconi is DH, Mountcastle is at first.

Marconi is too busy with his radio invention to DH......lol.   Hard to see how that makes any real difference on the field in 2020 and it surely worsens any trade value for Mancini.  If I plan on Mountcastle just taking his position, then I pretty much have to trade Mancini now this winter.   And Davis won't just sit, imho.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

Marconi is too busy with his radio invention to DH......lol.   Hard to see how that makes any real difference on the field in 2020 and it surely worsens any trade value for Mancini.  If I plan on Mountcastle just taking his position, then I pretty much have to trade Mancini now this winter.   And Davis won't just sit, imho.  

Because you have never been hit with autocorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

 

What do you do with Mancini if you bring up Mountcastle? And with Davis still on the team?

I think that unless Davis shows miraculous improvement after the offseason, he will be cut in the first half or his playing time will be cut in half.    They’ll find room for Mountcastle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Frobby said:

What would you predict for each of them in 2020, as your mid-case?

Hays — I’ll go with .275/.325/.460.

Mountcastle — I’ll say .275/.315/.460.    
 

So combined, .275/.320/.460.    

I think Mountcastle will hit like Mancini in his rookie year.    293/338/488.826

Hays   280/340/460/800

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, MDtransplant757 said:

McKenna and Diaz spend all of 2020 in Norfolk. Mountcastle and Akin stay at least until the O's get an extra year. Hays should break with the team. Mountcastle I think shuffles between DH and 1B with Mancini because we have LF options in Stewart and Santander, and RF will probably be one of those two to start out the year. This thinking comes with me also thinking that Mancini or Nunez will most likely be traded. BP wise and SP wise outside of Akin, everyone from bowie in 2019 is probably going to sit there and develop unless they blow the door down. There's no reason to rush anyone up. We'll have some depth signed, but that's kinda it. 

I think McKenna begin the season at AA.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

Marconi is too busy with his radio invention to DH......lol.   Hard to see how that makes any real difference on the field in 2020 and it surely worsens any trade value for Mancini.  If I plan on Mountcastle just taking his position, then I pretty much have to trade Mancini now this winter.   And Davis won't just sit, imho.  

If Davis hits like he did last season he is not going to place much.   Defensively replacement at first and come in when the game is out of hand to rest other players. I doubt the cut Davis until to management thinks they are ready to contend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

If Davis hits like he did last season he is not going to place much.   Defensively replacement at first and come in when the game is out of hand to rest other players.

His defense doesn't warrant him being inserted as a defensive replacement, especially if one thinks Mancini is at least average at first.  ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm lost for words about why Rutschman struggled, other than as I've long said he's a catcher and you're not going to get a MOO monster bat playing 110 games behind the plate- but the overall outcome of the team was within what I thought was reasonable, if a bit on the low end. Regarding the depth, Holliday and Mayo are more talented than Urias, but if we had gotten rid of Urias, Mateo, and Mountcastle to hand them spots, this team would have been worse for it, and maybe not even make the playoffs. Urias is good.  Mountcastle is good.  They're not "everyday" players according to your definition, but we have exactly one of those guys.  That doesn't mean every one else is " not good." I wouldn't be surprised to see all three back next year.  I wouldn't be surprised if they moved on from 2-3 of them.  Though I think the former is far wiser than the latter, though it depends on a lot of other things.
    • My post is coming off the wrong way.  The OP I quoted seemed like you were “lost for words” about why the team struggled the way they did. All I’m saying is I think you are like that because you didn’t see the scenarios where this much of a drop off from last year was going to happen. And btw, the depth (to me at least) wasn’t a good thing.  Depth is good when the players are good. If not, they are just guys blocking better talent.
    • But we have no idea who told her or of the info is good. She has given no reason to believe her. Im sure someone told her something but im not sure she smart enough to be able to tell the difference between good info and bad info.
    • I'm a big fan.  It doesn't mean I have sources in the clubhouse. Do we have any idea who her sources are?  Does she have any kind of track record of having reliable sources?
    • I don't know who this woman is and I don't do Twitter. And this is what I touched on in the other thread: I don't know what the best path forward is b/c I don't know exactly what the problem is. I don't think Hyde needs to go, but if this is true- and I have no idea if it is or not- he should be gone. The talk of veteran leaders brings questions.  What was insufficient of the leadership of Satandaner, Mullins, Burnes, and Kimbrel?  
    • Sig for me is notably rigorous trying to combat this.    I feel pretty sure he had a say in crafting his very geeky title, a reflection of his personal brand. We'll see how it goes here if it becomes recommending Adam Frazier and Kyle Gibson as correct for the roster once again.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...