Jump to content

Is Mouncastle as good a hitter as Mancini was prior to his rookie year?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Eric-OH said:

Elias has failed to elaborate on Davis simply being at Spring Training several times.  Almost like Belichick he’ll admit to Davis being there but not too much after that.  We both noticed the same lack of Chris in that statement.  I wonder if decisions have been made and contingencies are already in place.

I hope so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think last straws are irrelevant.  I think it is all down to if ownership will OK cutting Davis with the money owed and I don't think things like that are going to influence their decision.  The evidence has been overwhelming for some time that the Davis contract is a total loss.

We know that Elias stated in September that there were certain things he asked Davis to work on over the off season, though he didn't specify what they were.

Davis's recent comments to the Hot Stove show SEEM to make it clear that he ignored that request (unless Elias's request was that he bulk up).

I could certainly envision a scenario where Elias went to ownership at some point last season and outlined to ownership certain changes in approach that he felt Davis had to make in order to have any chance of improving.  And now it APPEARS that Elias will be able to go to ownership with some evidence that Davis didn't even get with the program.  His comments to the call in about not changing what worked for him for years speaks volumes.

The Angelos's aren't stupid.  If they have been holding on to Davis on the slight hope that they could recoup something from their investment, this could be the factor that convinces them that won't happen.  If they were worried about a PR fallout from getting rid of one of the last 2 or 3 recognizable faces on the team to the average non-fanatic casual fan, a guy who is good in the community and still well liked by most (remember the cheers when he ended his 0-fer)... they may finally have a justification that will swing the PR in their favor.  Casual fans don't like a guy who is perceives as not trying, and refusing to do what the team wanted in the off-season gives that appearqnce, especially on the heels of the Palmer incident last summer.

There has to be a reason besides stupidity for ownership's apparent desire to keep Davis.  Whether it is fear of bad PR, stubbornness, hope of a turnaround no matter how unlikely... If it is any of those 3 things, Davis's demonstrable decision to ignore an off-season request by the Orioles to make adjustments could definitely start swaying the owners' opinion.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, 7Mo said:

I differ only in the sense that I think he gets 6 weeks of the regular season to fail. Then he's gone. And that will coincide with the Mountcastle call up.

This is literal Groundhogs day - the same posts were up last season, consensus being that he’d probably make it to the All Star break 2019 but there is no way he’d make it past that at current production.

If you need something to make his at bats more enjoyable in the meantime, just pretend he’s Bartolo Colon, it makes all of his homeruns that much more exciting.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/14/2020 at 4:51 PM, higgybaby said:

I would love to see what he could do over there at 2nd base. 
His bat would possibly be elite for a 2nd baseman. 

I totally agree.  Most of the comments I've read about his defense seem to be about his arm, which shouldn't be as much of an issue at 2nd of course.  Could he be a Jeff Kent like 2nd baseman?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, waroriole said:

I think you guys are dreaming if you believe Davis is getting cut as early as 6 weeks into the season. There’s just nobody pushing down the door in AAA to warrant writing that money off yet. I think we see his playing time dwindle to once a week unless there are injuries, but with an extra bench spot this year they’ll continue to see what happens. 
 

I don’t see a Davis roster spot having any determination on a Mountcastle call up. 

There is no way Davis is leaving at 6 weeks but theres a player on his own team that should be the every day first baseman. To your point Davis could stash and be the DH/backup 1st baseman.

I’ve heard such mixed things about Mountcastle defensively, but I dont ever remember a player that came into the minors as a shortstop and had to play 1st base off the bat out of the minors.  Perhaps someone can fact check me there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheOtherRipken said:

There is no way Davis is leaving at 6 weeks but theres a player on his own team that should be the every day first baseman. To your point Davis could stash and be the DH/backup 1st baseman.

I’ve heard such mixed things about Mountcastle defensively, but I dont ever remember a player that came into the minors as a shortstop and had to play 1st base off the bat out of the minors.  Perhaps someone can fact check me there.

Mark Reynolds.

Of course Mark is legally blind.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TheOtherRipken said:

I’ve heard such mixed things about Mountcastle defensively, but I dont ever remember a player that came into the minors as a shortstop and had to play 1st base off the bat out of the minors.  Perhaps someone can fact check me there.

Hunter Dozier and Michael Cuddyer were drafted as shortstops and were basically 1B/RFers by the time they got to the majors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, TheOtherRipken said:

There is no way Davis is leaving at 6 weeks but theres a player on his own team that should be the every day first baseman. To your point Davis could stash and be the DH/backup 1st baseman.

I’ve heard such mixed things about Mountcastle defensively, but I dont ever remember a player that came into the minors as a shortstop and had to play 1st base off the bat out of the minors.  Perhaps someone can fact check me there.

Adam Jones was a short stop through AA.  Tons of guys move off Shortstop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, connja said:

I totally agree.  Most of the comments I've read about his defense seem to be about his arm, which shouldn't be as much of an issue at 2nd of course.  Could he be a Jeff Kent like 2nd baseman?

 

That seems the obvious solution but it is so obvious that it also seems they would have tried it by now if there was any chance of it working out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, atomic said:

Adam Jones was a short stop through AA.  Tons of guys move off Shortstop. 

Great example, 1989.    The following players were drafted as shortstops:   Jim Thome, Jorge Posada, Trevor Hoffman, Jason Giambi and Phil Nevin.   And other guys like Jeff Kent and Chuck Knoblauch.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?pos=SS&year_ID=1989&query_type=pos_year&from_type_jc=0&from_type_hs=0&from_type_4y=0&from_type_unk=0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Great example, 1989.    The following players were drafted as shortstops:   Jim Thome, Jorge Posada, Trevor Hoffman, Jason Giambi and Phil Nevin.   And other guys like Jeff Kent and Chuck Knoblauch.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?pos=SS&year_ID=1989&query_type=pos_year&from_type_jc=0&from_type_hs=0&from_type_4y=0&from_type_unk=0

That's crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, SteveA said:

We know that Elias stated in September that there were certain things he asked Davis to work on over the off season, though he didn't specify what they were.

Davis's recent comments to the Hot Stove show SEEM to make it clear that he ignored that request (unless Elias's request was that he bulk up).

I could certainly envision a scenario where Elias went to ownership at some point last season and outlined to ownership certain changes in approach that he felt Davis had to make in order to have any chance of improving.  And now it APPEARS that Elias will be able to go to ownership with some evidence that Davis didn't even get with the program.  His comments to the call in about not changing what worked for him for years speaks volumes.

The Angelos's aren't stupid.  If they have been holding on to Davis on the slight hope that they could recoup something from their investment, this could be the factor that convinces them that won't happen.  If they were worried about a PR fallout from getting rid of one of the last 2 or 3 recognizable faces on the team to the average non-fanatic casual fan, a guy who is good in the community and still well liked by most (remember the cheers when he ended his 0-fer)... they may finally have a justification that will swing the PR in their favor.  Casual fans don't like a guy who is perceives as not trying, and refusing to do what the team wanted in the off-season gives that appearqnce, especially on the heels of the Palmer incident last summer.

There has to be a reason besides stupidity for ownership's apparent desire to keep Davis.  Whether it is fear of bad PR, stubbornness, hope of a turnaround no matter how unlikely... If it is any of those 3 things, Davis's demonstrable decision to ignore an off-season request by the Orioles to make adjustments could definitely start swaying the owners' opinion.

Really well said. They have a lot of money invested in Davis. I have no problem with them doing their due diligence, especially with the team as bad as it is.

If Davis struggles again, Elias can go to ownership and say they have exhausted all options - now that he's had an offseason with Elias' regime in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...