Jump to content

Adley so far: 0-8, 1 walk, 5 Ks


interloper

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, jrobb21613 said:

I’m a little concerned not just because of this spring but the combination of last year in the minors and this spring. He hasn’t shown anything at the plate. I did see some video of some good looking bp sessions but that’s the only positive I can think of. 

Does anyone remember the bad start Cal Ripkin had in his first year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine they had a re-draft tomorrow. Would Adley be picked outside of the top 5? If he was 3-8 this spring would he be validated as a future star? If we have a cold front does that global warming is a myth? Lots of guys underwhelm in the minors without really putting up impressive stats (Manny, Halladay) but the talent is obvious. I’m not at all concerned. Has anyone said that he looks bad at the plate? No, the numbers just haven’t been there. Seriously short sample size. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Win Column said:

Maybe he'll be a bizarro Wieters of sorts: somewhat above-average in the minors, HOF-level MLB career.

In any instance, not at all worried. 

He's just managing expectations.  The only reason Wieters was a disappointment was that he OPS'd 1.000+ his first full year in the minors and Baseball Prospectus used their comp-based PECOTA system to briefly spit out Johnny Bench-level numbers for him.  If he'd OPS'd .725 at Bowie then had his real MLB career he'd be fondly remembered here.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

He's just managing expectations.  The only reason Wieters was a disappointment was that he OPS'd 1.000+ his first full year in the minors and Baseball Prospectus used their comp-based PECOTA system to briefly spit out Johnny Bench-level numbers for him.  If he'd OPS'd .725 at Bowie then had his real MLB career he'd be fondly remembered here.

I still very much remember Wieters fondly. I think you're pretty crazy if you don't. He's one of the most successful homegrown All-Stars that we've produced in the last decade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, interloper said:

I still very much remember Wieters fondly. I think you're pretty crazy if you don't. He's one of the most successful homegrown All-Stars that we've produced in the last decade. 

I do, too.  But if you ran a poll right now the overwhelming sentiment about Wieters would be that he fell far short of expectations.  He was supposed to personally rescue the O's from the 1998-2011 era, and he ended up being but a small part of that.  Not unlike Eddie and his inability to personally overcome the mid-80s Orioles disdain for signing free agents or developing prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I do, too.  But if you ran a poll right now the overwhelming sentiment about Wieters would be that he fell far short of expectations.  He was supposed to personally rescue the O's from the 1998-2011 era, and he ended up being but a small part of that.  Not unlike Eddie and his inability to personally overcome the mid-80s Orioles disdain for signing free agents or developing prospects.

Yep.  Fell short of expectations for me but he was still really good.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rutschman may be someone who takes some time to get comfortable. 

He has also basically been a pinch hitter and I would think is very focused on his defense. Vaughn did a little bit better in the minors last year but it wasn’t anything spectacular.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We should sticky this post. It will be absolutely hilarious to read for a long time. 

For example... “Damn.  Remember how bad things were back in 2020?”

Certainly hope it will be hilarious. I’ll make it my avatar in four years either way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I do, too.  But if you ran a poll right now the overwhelming sentiment about Wieters would be that he fell far short of expectations.  He was supposed to personally rescue the O's from the 1998-2011 era, and he ended up being but a small part of that.  Not unlike Eddie and his inability to personally overcome the mid-80s Orioles disdain for signing free agents or developing prospects.

Man did the Orioles front office go from the best to one of the worse in a decade. Free Agency certainly hurt the Orioles as they allowed home grown talent like Grich and Garland (which worked out) to be signed away but the minor league system really dried up once the final wave of Dennis Martinez, Mike Flanagan and Eddie Murray came up. Obvious Ripken was a great selection, but after that, the well went very, very dry as Mike Boddicker and maybe Storm Davis were really the only impact players/pitchers to come up after Ripken for some time. Probably until the next wave of Pete Harnish, Steve Finley and Bob Milacki came up and the Orioles bed that dry by trading Harnish and Finley away in the awful Davis trade that had to be done after they traded disgruntled Eddie Murray. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to early to overreact and put to much pressure on the guy.  We all thought he was the best pick.   If he doesn't turn out to be a great baseball player we will have to live with that when it comes about. 

But the high failure rate of draft picks in MLB is a reason that I think tanking is not the best idea.   The Astros got really lucky that one of their first overalls didn't take their offer or they would have only had Correa for three years of being the worst team in baseball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Oh, I thought you were taking about his hitting in high leverage situations. 
    • Frustrating sure, but boring is not what I would I say. We do steal bases at times. I would like for us to play more small ball sometimes and it is frustrating to see us be so homerun happy. I think with Westy back, we will see a resurgence of timely hitting as that is very contagious.   We saw that at the beginning of the year. Amazing sight to see for sure. I think the most disheartening thing that really shocked me is the apathy and outright disgust I’ve seen from O’s fans toward their team. Perhaps we have been spoiled? No idea. Maybe expectations were too high? No idea, but frankly, a lot of yall focusing on other things and simply not watching/posting would make next season a lot more enjoyable. This is the first time since 96-97 where we make the playoffs in back to back years and you guys have been acting like some real lame jerks this whole dang season. Frankly, yall should be ashamed of yourselves. We are an incredibly young team and with that come highs and lows, but yall don’t see that. You just love to complain and moan and bloviate. Where’s the heart? Where’s the loyalty? Where’s the gratitude? You’d think with all this team has overcome, especially being so young, y’all would be happy, but no. So go off on your little bike rides or whatever. Go watch a movie if this saga seems boring to you. I don’t care. Just for once this season, keep your immense negativity to yourself.
    • Really an amazing run, 4 straight years. I completely agree with the ranking, too. There's no way Kjerstad is still a prospect though, right? 45 days is the cutoff and he's played in 48 games.
    • i think we all are going to have ptsd from that 9th inning for a while,it was that brutally bad . they need to do some special to get us to forget about it
    • wow,did gunnar and adley have to do this last season? 
    • I suggested that earlier but I think it's probably a bad play with no out. The O's have like 85% probability of scoring. There is a huge downside risk of Mullins popping up the bunt for a double play. He could also whiff on the bunt making at least Holliday an easy out. With one out and only 65% probability of scoring it's a much better play. I think if Santander and Mullins were reversed in the lineup Hyde may have done it but not when you have two shots to get the run in. 
    • WE GOT US ONE - JD5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...