Jump to content

Raw Story: Covid19 Destruction of the Minor Leagues.


weams

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

There are a lot of factors.  In the 1950s clearly TV had a huge impact.  The 1948 Indians drew 2.6 million fans, which was the record for decades.  Cleveland was still a fairly large industrial city (about 900k people, 7th in the US), prior to the rust belt, but it wasn't some kind of high-income metropolis.  In 1958 they drew 660k fans.  The Yankees' attendance fell by almost half in that same period.  The '55 Senators drew 425,000 fans, or 5500 a game.  That's less than the Hartford Yard Goats drew last year.

Transportation was different, cars less reliable, efficient, and fewer of them per household.  People were fleeing cities for the suburbs in the 50s.  Stadiums were mostly 30, 40, 50 years old with few amenities, no parking, and often bad sight lines.  We romanticize places like Ebbets Field or the Polo Grounds but they were generations older than Memorial Stadium, which was pretty outdated when I went there in the 80s and early 90s.

In 1950 and 1960 the average MLB ticket was between $1.50 and $2.00, compared to over $20 today.  Which is fairly in line with inflation, a $1.50 in 1950 is about $16.00 today.

I had similar experiences growing up.  My Dad was a government engineer and project manager, making a solid GS-13 salary and we went out to eat a few times a year.  We made it to one or two Orioles games a year, and we're about two hours from Baltimore.  When he was a kid in the 50s I don't know that it ever occurred to them to go to DC or Baltimore to a ballgame, but they were three or four hours away, and lower-middle class farmers.  But clearly the population had the capacity to draw 2M+ to a some city's baseball games, if the external factors cooperated.

Although in 1978 the Orioles' all time attendance record for a season was 1.203M fans, in 1966.  Or 100k less than the '19 Orioles.

Woe, Dad was a GS-13 too, made grade pretty fast and then plateaued there until he retired. 

Now that you mentioned it, I think we got to about 3 Senator games a season, probably one a month in June, July and August. Almost always on a give away day.

Compared to some stadiums like Memorial Park, RFK had relatively decent parking situation and was pretty brand new. Built in 61.

Back then, we didnt care about megatron scoreboards and other amenities, of course, now that we have them, how did we live without them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Redskins Rick said:

Back then, we didnt care about megatron scoreboards and other amenities, of course, now that we have them, how did we live without them.

I think there's a lesson to be learned, that the ballclubs figured out 20 or 30 years ago: If you're just selling baseball games you'll draw 10,000 or 15,000 fans a game most years in most cities.  But if you're selling baseball with exploding scoreboards and lots of food options and club level amenities, and mascots, and between inning entertainment, and big stores with team gear, and comfortable seats... then you might draw 25k or 30k or more.

The growth in attendance from the 70s to the 2000s wasn't people who keep score and post on the Hangout and can't wait for Ryan Mountcastle to show up.  It's people who want slushees and Korean tacos and a new hat.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Fun fact of the day: the 1935 St. Louis Browns drew 80,922 fans, or 1065 per game.  Supporting a payroll of approximately $108,000. 

I don't know how they didn't go bankrupt.  Tickets had to be 50 cents.  They probably only made payroll based on revenue from advertising signs on the outfield fence and ads in the program.  And beer.

Wonder if like little league, the managers did the caulk lines, and even cut the grass. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Redskins Rick said:

Wonder if like little league, the managers did the caulk lines, and even cut the grass. LOL

Even in the 1890s the Orioles had a full-time groundskeeper.  Thomas Murphy.  Lived in a little apartment in a shack on the Union Park grounds.  The NL Orioles' max attendance was 328k in 1894.  He's the one who put soap flakes around the mound, and told the O's pitchers to keep some dirt in their pocket so the ball wouldn't get slippery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I think there's a lesson to be learned, that the ballclubs figured out 20 or 30 years ago: If you're just selling baseball games you'll draw 10,000 or 15,000 fans a game most years in most cities.  But if you're selling baseball with exploding scoreboards and lots of food options and club level amenities, and mascots, and between inning entertainment, and big stores with team gear, and comfortable seats... then you might draw 25k or 30k or more.

The growth in attendance from the 70s to the 2000s wasn't people who keep score and post on the Hangout and can't wait for Ryan Mountcastle to show up.  It's people who want slushees and Korean tacos and a new hat.

New Hat!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, weams said:

That old Texas stadium (which I think was also called Globe Life in its death throes) had food that was celebratory. Bigger. Better.  Texas. 

That old Texas stadium that opened in 1994.  I understand building a new stadium every 10 or 20 years when the old one is made of wood and seats 6500 and the old one caught fire.  But when the old one is concrete and steel and has luxury boxes and cost $329 million and the taxpayers foot the bill?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That old Texas stadium that opened in 1994.  I understand building a new stadium every 10 or 20 years when the old one is made of wood and seats 6500 and the old one caught fire.  But when the old one is concrete and steel and has luxury boxes and cost $329 million and the taxpayers foot the bill?

They forgot to put a roof on it in 1994 and then temperatures went up 20 degrees. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That old Texas stadium that opened in 1994.  I understand building a new stadium every 10 or 20 years when the old one is made of wood and seats 6500 and the old one caught fire.  But when the old one is concrete and steel and has luxury boxes and cost $329 million and the taxpayers foot the bill?

Better to waste money that way, then spending 4 Billion to a Chinese lab so they can play with Bats. :)

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Couldn't you buy a Zeppelin (cost $21m) and have it fly around blocking the sun?  That would be a lot cheaper than a new stadium.

It's that "conditioned air" that they are after. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, weams said:

It's that "conditioned air" that they are after. 

Wusses.  They should be forced to go 81 day games in a suit and bowler hat. 

That's why even the Yanks sometimes barely drew 1M fans a year prior to lights.  You have to be a little addled in the brain to sit in the sun in dress clothes watching a 60-win St. Louis Browns or Washington Senators team.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Wusses.  They should be forced to go 81 day games in a suit and bowler hat. 

That's why even the Yanks sometimes barely drew 1M fans a year prior to lights.  You have to be a little addled in the brain to sit in the sun in dress clothes watching a 60-win St. Louis Browns or Washington Senators team.

I remember the old style wool like baseball uniforms, hot and itchy, how the heck could they play in those?????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Adley is having a down year. I believe he will bounce back.
    • I admire those of you who have such confidence in this offense. It’s been absolutely terrible for months, other than the last week of the season. It was beyond terrible yesterday- yes Ragans was good but the approach was awful by every hitter. I’ll be thrilled for them to prove me overly pessimistic, but I have zero faith in these bats.  This is at least partially a defense mechanism. I am not ready for the baseball season to be over, and another terribly quick exit from the postseason would just be so dreadful. I don’t need them to win the WS. But winning one GD game would be nice. Not looking forward to six months without baseball. 
    • You don’t have to twist yourself into a pretzel to defend Hyde. If Santander’s defense costs us, it means we got to extra innings and pinch running for OHearn was the right call. Also, are you really trying to say that OHearn is so valuable a defender at 1B that we couldn’t stand to lose that glove in extras? I doubt he’s even better than Santander. 
    • Here's what people thought a couple weeks ago.   
    • Wieters' bWAR was 13.3 through his first 4 seasons (2009 - 2012).  It ended at 18.3 after his last season in 2020, so he was basically ineffective for the last 8 years of his career. Adley's bWAR is 13.1 through his first 3 seasons. So it isn't like Wieters didn't have a strong start to his career just like Adley did.  I think the concern that folks have is that the rest of Adley's career will play out like the rest of Wieters' career.  It seemed very unlikely halfway through this year, but this has been one hell of a drop-off.   And after Wieters never lived up to expectations, it is definitely a fear that we may be reliving this again.  Let's hope this second half was just an aberration.   
    • Adley has been in a horrible almost 4 month slump. Before that, he was the WAY BETTER offensive player. But I pose this question: What does it matter if Rutschman turns out to be worse than Wieters? Matt Wieters was drafted almost TWENTY YEARS AGO. No one in this org had anything to do with him being on our roster. HEck none of our current front office was even here for his entire Orioles' career.
    • I do feel like Adley is out of shape or at least has gotten more out of shape than usual. That’s part of the reason I think he’s hurt…not working out as much. If he is healthy and the slump is this bad, I’m ok questioning whether or not the new GF(ie the distraction) is part of it. Is he putting everything into the game that he should?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...