Jump to content

Tracking Ex Oriole Thread


Rene88

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

A utility guy would have made more sense than Pedro, but get back to me in a few months, Flaherty has a big hole in his swing, it'll get exploited in time.

Or Pedro. And I like Pedro but his value is zero currently. Can’t play the field. He was even awful at 1b in ST.

People can hate all they want but I think he   will be much better than you think. Time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rene88 said:

Or Pedro. And I like Pedro but his value is zero currently. Can’t play the field. He was even awful at 1b in ST.

People can hate all they want but I think he   will be much better than you think. Time will tell.

No hate...just not wearing the Ryan colored love glasses.   His skills have not magically become what they never were before.  I will take Valencia any day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

No hate...just not wearing the Ryan colored love glasses.   His skills have not magically become what they never were before.  I will take Valencia any day. 

Speaking of Valencia...why are we watching Pedro, Ofor Chris Davis and K King Asmus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ryan always struck me as a nice guy who genuinely seemed proud to be an Oriole. His talent may not have always matched his enthusiasm, but I don't look back at Flaherty with any negativity. He was a utility player who could be plugged in almost anywhere. 

I've shared a few journalist's tweets about his hot start, but obviously it is partly in jest. He's going to come back to reality, but I'm happy to see the guy have success, even in spurts. At the end of the day, he was a major league ball player, not an elite one, but he was there and contributed. It's more than I can say about myself. I hope he and Markakis have success in Atlanta. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thatbearflies said:

Ryan always struck me as a nice guy who genuinely seemed proud to be an Oriole. His talent may not have always matched his enthusiasm, but I don't look back at Flaherty with any negativity. He was a utility player who could be plugged in almost anywhere. 

I've shared a few journalist's tweets about his hot start, but obviously it is partly in jest. He's going to come back to reality, but I'm happy to see the guy have success, even in spurts. At the end of the day, he was a major league ball player, not an elite one, but he was there and contributed. It's more than I can say about myself. I hope he and Markakis have success in Atlanta. 

I liked Flash you know if Buck had any say he would be and Oriole right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My personal goal for the team for April: get back to .500. Don’t let March 31 be the last time the team sniffs .500 this year. If we don’t get back to .500 in April, we won’t make it to .500 at all this year, since the team habitually limps into the end of the season due to lack of effort and conditioning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Rene88 said:

Making some great plays for the Braves at 3B and another hit! Nice start.

I had my criticisms but still would rather have him than Gentry.

The part of baseball I like the most/least is April.  Because it's so hard to tell what people mean when they talk about 31-year-old .219 hitters going 8-for-their-first-16.  Do they mean that this is an almost miraculous, divinely inspired change in their ability and they've somehow gone from barely passable to highly productive at an advanced age?  Or are they just remarking how cool it is that something with a 21% chance of happening can sometimes occur 50% of the time if you give it enough four game trials?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, alaniee said:

Craig Gentry had the #1 defensive play of MLB's opening week.

Flaherty would not be doing anything for us if we had him. We had him for years and he didn't do much.

Thank you Atlanta.

 

 

What?  This is such a typical internet chat room response.  Flaherty was exactly what the Os needed for years.  And, oh, by the way, he actually showed up when he made appearances in the playoffs.... hitting a respectable .281 / .830 ops.

Why crap on the guy like he was roadkill?

 

LAME

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, allquixotic said:

My personal goal for the team for April: get back to .500. Don’t let March 31 be the last time the team sniffs .500 this year. If we don’t get back to .500 in April, we won’t make it to .500 at all this year, since the team habitually limps into the end of the season due to lack of effort and conditioning.

This just isn't remotely true.  Last year was the 1st time under Buck Showalter that you could say the Orioles "limped" into the end of the season.  They either been at .500 or above .500 (several times well above .500) in September/October every other year.  To say this team has a lack of effort or conditioning has no support logically.

I would also disagree that if they don't get to .500 in April they never will.  They have an extremely difficult schedule in April.  I would like them to just not get buried.  The schedule eventually will soften a bit, and the team will eventually even score some runs off of starting pitchers.  Maybe not tonight with Verlander though :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
    • I’m slightly (irrationally, I admit, there’s no factual basis for what I’m about to say) worried that Gunnar is going to view this as the “Gunnar vs. Bobby” show and press hard at the plate and in the field leading to bad at bats and unforced errors. 
    • Sounds like getting your heart broken by big league ballplayers is a personal problem. Learn and adjust accordingly. These guys usually aren’t trying to be role models and he played in an era where a lot of players were on the gas. Was I surprised? Yeah, a little bit.  No one likes to admit Jose Canseco was the most honest one up there that day and was telling the truth the entire time.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...