Jump to content

DJ Stewart..breakout candidate?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I am sure Mountcastle will play some LF but Hays, Mullins and Santander are pushing him toward DH.   His defense in left this spring has been inconsistent.   That could impact Stewart ability to get at bats.

I bet Santander plays more DH than Ryan. They need to see Ryan in the OF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, ChosenOne21 said:

What do you mean either way? I'm pretty sure if he hit fastballs at a league average rate and played average defense while keeping his barrel% and walk rate where they are, he'd be a lot more than a role-player

His game isn’t good enough to be an everyday player.  He doesn’t hit lefties well enough, doesn’t hit for a good enough average and doesn’t play good enough defense.

He’s a 300-400 at bat player who you put in the sofa occasionally and let him DH the rest of the time.

Nothing wrong with that...a lot of players are like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

His game isn’t good enough to be an everyday player.  He doesn’t hit lefties well enough, doesn’t hit for a good enough average and doesn’t play good enough defense.

He’s a 300-400 at bat player who you put in the sofa occasionally and let him DH the rest of the time.

Nothing wrong with that...a lot of players are like that.

Until he gets expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I am sure Mountcastle will play some LF but Hays, Mullins and Santander are pushing him toward DH.   His defense in left this spring has been inconsistent.   That could impact Stewart ability to get at bats.

I do like that alignment but I guess on that wonder I was more accepting the team's LF Mountcastle bargaining position.   For sure Mullins or Hays would be just as good or better choices as Ruiz/Valaika.

Its strange to say but for our current circumstances Backup 1B is I guess a big role.  Mountcastle feels like the obvious guy, having been near full time there most of 2019, but for the team's new preference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

They want to see Ryan in the outfield.  They don't need him out there as long as Mullins, Hays and Santander stay heathy.

Santander was rumored to be a trade candidate. Mountcastle is younger and has 6 years of service time. They aren’t turning him into a DH at 23 to play Mullins some. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Mullins' defense + offense < Mountcastle's defense + offense.

 

imo

To me it’s not even about that.  It’s about the future. They need to see what he can do in the OF. I’m not saying he won’t be a DH some but I doubt it’s significant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Couple more things. I have wanted to see Stewart play the last 2 years. I hope he gets a lot of at bats. Give him a look. 
 

Another is we haven’t to my knowledge seen Ryan at 1B in a game all spring. They seem committed to playing him in LF and seeing what he can do.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Santander was rumored to be a trade candidate. Mountcastle is younger and has 6 years of service time. They aren’t turning him into a DH at 23 to play Mullins some. 

By next spring I think there is better odds that Santander will be in right, Mountcastle will be at 1B and Mancini will have been traded. Remember Mancini is a FA after 2022.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

By next spring I think there is better odds that Santander will be in right, Mountcastle will be at 1B and Mancini will have been traded. Remember Mancini is a FA after 2022.

Entirely possible but I think for now they will exhaust their looks at Mountcastle in LF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

To me it’s not even about that.  It’s about the future. They need to see what he can do in the OF. I’m not saying he won’t be a DH some but I doubt it’s significant. 

I

 

10 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

 Couple more things. I have wanted to see Stewart play the last 2 years. I hope he gets a lot of at bats. Give him a look. 
 

Another is we haven’t to my knowledge seen Ryan at 1B in a game all spring. They seem committed to playing him in LF and seeing what he can do.  

We have not seen Valdez start.....well not until Tuesday.   We don't know how much they are working with Mountcastle at 1B on the back fields.

The thing we do know is that Mountcastle's bat will be in the lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

I

 

We have not seen Valdez start.....well not until Tuesday.   We don't know how much they are working with Mountcastle at 1B on the back fields.

I don’t think that is a fair comparison. Valdez is still pitching and did pitch as a starter in the winter. 1B is an entirely different position. 
 

He may be working out some at 1B but I would think he would be there some in games if they wanted to go that route.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • In your retirement you stay up too late and worry too much.  
    • If you want style points, watch figure skating. A bloop hit looks the same as a line drive hit in the box score. A win is a win.
    • Every time we get a pitcher from the A’s this time of year, I think they are still doing us a solid for trading them Pat Neshek for cash in 2012.
    • I understand why you'd be concerned with Webb's performance but that contract is so juicy that I'd jump on him if he were available.  4/82 plus the remainder of his salary this year is a steal for him, even accounting for the fact that pitcher arb awards have been weirdly low.
    • Great to get a 2-0 win facing George Kirby, but man they made it way harder than it had to be. Grayson gets staked to a 1-0 lead in the top of the 4th, then walks 2 of the first 3 batters he faces in the bottom of the inning.  Fortunately, erased on a DP. The O’s score an insurance run in the 7th, but then can’t capitalize on a bases loaded, one out situation with Gunnar and Adley up.   In the bottom half, Grayson allows a single and puts the tying run on via a walk, then makes a poor throw on an easy DP comebacker that could have loaded the bases but Gunnar somehow got a barehand grip on the ball with his foot on the bag.   In the 8th, O’Hearn leads off with a double but the O’s failed to advance him. In the 9th, Kimbrel hits a guy, almost allows a game-tying homer that goes just foul, then hits another guy, and the baserunners both get into scoring position but Kimbrel is able to end it on a strikeout.    I’m thrilled they won, but man they made it gut-wrenching.   
    • 1: A lot of posters here actually have an milb.tv subscription and use it, or they attend games in person.  So you're off base if you think the prevailing opinion here is based on a few social media posts. 2: Henderson doesn't have a famous dad, and Holliday outproduced him at a younger age in the minors, and people here were about equally hyped about Henderson. 3: Holliday put up a 1.000+ OPS in AA as a 19 year old.  AA is harder than power-5 division 1 college baseball.  That's basically like a freshman putting up 25/10/5.  Not 4 points a game.  Get outta here with your terrible Bronny James comparisons.  If people here were actually blinded by a last name then posters here would have thought that Ryan Ripken was a legitimate prospect.  Believe it or not some of us actually do research on things like this.  We certainly aren't alone in rating Holliday highly, as he was rated #1 or #2 overall by every publication I can think of (and #1 by most of them if I recall.) 4: Holliday for Miller, who isn't guaranteed to be healthy enough to be in the starting rotation over the course of his controlled years, is a ludicrous trade proposal and I'm glad you're not our GM.  You're trading Holliday for an ace.  And not just any ace, an ace without injury concerns with years of control left.  Someone like Chris Sale, when the White Sox traded him for Moncada/Kopech+.  Anything less than an ace is a terrible return.  And I get that Moncada was probably a bad #1 overall prospect, but even if you think Holliday is a bad #1 overall too, you're still undervaluing him to an absurd degree by settling for a reliever with injury concerns, even a shutdown one.
    • So, Burnes is pushed back to Thursday. He could still make the Tuesday-Sunday starts next week, or does Hyde go with Kremer to make two starts next week. The Sunday game against the Yankees could be big. I think if we win two of three we clinch the season series.    
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...