Jump to content

NL VP of Scouting : " It’s embarrassing to the sport what they’re doing, or aren’t doing."


jamesenoch

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

It is not as if Dan's group were complete failures when it came to producing ML talent, even if Dan traded a fair bit of it away.

Dans group were dismal at developing starting pitching. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't literally everyone agree that with a lost season of minor league games, we have almost no clue how well Elias has acquired and developed guys since he's been here?

The indications are good, from the pitching and winning statistics in year 1 generally, to the development of Baumann and Lowther specifically. Yet we have no clue if we've found a diamond through the international draft, or if guys like Stowers or Welk will surprise, etc. Who even knows about Kjerstad? Individual players aside, regardless of who is drafted, my sense is that the chances of success of the players inside our minor leagues are higher than they were at any time over the last 30 years.

Still, while I'm all in on Elias, I admit that we have to see the product improve on the field before we give him an unequivocal thumbs up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LookinUp said:

Doesn't literally everyone agree that with a lost season of minor league games, we have almost no clue how well Elias has acquired and developed guys since he's been here?

Are you seriously trying to apply logic to a sports fansite?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LTO's said:

Contrarian is contrarian 

Gausman and Bundy were representational products of their draft position.  Matusz had some early success as a starter.  Eduardo Rodriguez has had a nice career as has Zach Davies.

That's enough to move them out of dismal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

 

Gausman and Bundy were representational products of their draft position. Matusz had some early success as a starter. Eduardo Rodriguez has had a nice career as has Zach Davies.

That's enough to move them out of dismal.

 

o

 

Chris Tillman also came alive in 2012, after struggling in his first 3 seasons in the Majors from 2009 through 2011.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Gausman and Bundy were representational products of their draft position.  Matusz had some early success as a starter.  Eduardo Rodriguez has had a nice career as has Zach Davies.

That's enough to move them out of dismal.

Yeah, I stopped taking you seriously at Gausman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Gausman and Bundy were representational products of their draft position.  Matusz had some early success as a starter.  Eduardo Rodriguez has had a nice career as has Zach Davies.

That's enough to move them out of dismal.

I think the issue is everyone wants to link the last 3 decades all into one. I can see the argument from say post Mussina era until last decade. Not recently. 

9 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yeah, I stopped taking you seriously at Gausman. 

Gausman was better here than he gets credit for. 
 

There is this idea all these other teams also all develop all their starters. It’s false. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eddie83 said:

I think the issue is everyone wants to link the last 3 decades all into one. I can see the argument from say post Mussina era until last decade. Not recently. 

Gausman was better here than he gets credit for. 
 

There is this idea all these other teams also all develop all their starters. It’s false. 

No but there's this idea that guys leave Baltimore and go on to do better elsewhere.  It's true.

Gausman wasn't great.  That's why we traded him for bad bargaining chips and Atlanta dumped him quickly, too.  SF might have been able to figure him out but I wouldn't bet on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

No but there's this idea that guys leave Baltimore and go on to do better elsewhere.  It's true.

Gausman wasn't great.  That's why we traded him for bad bargaining chips and Atlanta dumped him quickly, too.  SF might have been able to figure him out but I wouldn't bet on it.

Dumping O'Day's contract really impacted the Gausman return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

No but there's this idea that guys leave Baltimore and go on to do better elsewhere.  It's true.

Gausman wasn't great.  That's why we traded him for bad bargaining chips and Atlanta dumped him quickly, too.  SF might have been able to figure him out but I wouldn't bet on it.

Gausman also has stretches where he pitches well until he doesn't. I want to see what a full season of Gausman looks like in San Francisco. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

No but there's this idea that guys leave Baltimore and go on to do better elsewhere.  It's true.

Gausman wasn't great.  That's why we traded him for bad bargaining chips and Atlanta dumped him quickly, too.  SF might have been able to figure him out but I wouldn't bet on it.

Look around the sport. How many good pitchers are with their original drafted team?  
 

Gausman has been all over the map since he left. Bundy I thought made strides here his last season. No idea how he would have fared here how he stayed. I think his style of pitching is a better fit out west also. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

No but there's this idea that guys leave Baltimore and go on to do better elsewhere.  It's true.

Gausman wasn't great.  That's why we traded him for bad bargaining chips and Atlanta dumped him quickly, too.  SF might have been able to figure him out but I wouldn't bet on it.

We’ve gotten back at least one interesting piece in Zimmerman. If he ends up as a back of the rotation guy for the next 3 or so years that trade is worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Dumping O'Day's contract really impacted the Gausman return.

He was never going to bring back an orgs top 5 prospect which is really bad considering his age and prospect pedigree. You are really overrating his value at that time and the effect Odays contract had. 
 

Dan and co. brought him up before he developed a consistent breaking pitch and after a while his fastball was teed off on. That’s a failure of development for a very promising prospect.  What even is the point of mentioning Erod and Davies? Both of them developed elsewhere. The fact that both of them were traded for rentals means that Dan clearly didn’t value them very highly. Another absolute failure on his part in regards to pitching in the org. Dan stripped this org down to nothing to win ONE playoff series. I don’t get why people look back so fondly on his time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • In your retirement you stay up too late and worry too much.  
    • If you want style points, watch figure skating. A bloop hit looks the same as a line drive hit in the box score. A win is a win.
    • Every time we get a pitcher from the A’s this time of year, I think they are still doing us a solid for trading them Pat Neshek for cash in 2012.
    • I understand why you'd be concerned with Webb's performance but that contract is so juicy that I'd jump on him if he were available.  4/82 plus the remainder of his salary this year is a steal for him, even accounting for the fact that pitcher arb awards have been weirdly low.
    • Great to get a 2-0 win facing George Kirby, but man they made it way harder than it had to be. Grayson gets staked to a 1-0 lead in the top of the 4th, then walks 2 of the first 3 batters he faces in the bottom of the inning.  Fortunately, erased on a DP. The O’s score an insurance run in the 7th, but then can’t capitalize on a bases loaded, one out situation with Gunnar and Adley up.   In the bottom half, Grayson allows a single and puts the tying run on via a walk, then makes a poor throw on an easy DP comebacker that could have loaded the bases but Gunnar somehow got a barehand grip on the ball with his foot on the bag.   In the 8th, O’Hearn leads off with a double but the O’s failed to advance him. In the 9th, Kimbrel hits a guy, almost allows a game-tying homer that goes just foul, then hits another guy, and the baserunners both get into scoring position but Kimbrel is able to end it on a strikeout.    I’m thrilled they won, but man they made it gut-wrenching.   
    • 1: A lot of posters here actually have an milb.tv subscription and use it, or they attend games in person.  So you're off base if you think the prevailing opinion here is based on a few social media posts. 2: Henderson doesn't have a famous dad, and Holliday outproduced him at a younger age in the minors, and people here were about equally hyped about Henderson. 3: Holliday put up a 1.000+ OPS in AA as a 19 year old.  AA is harder than power-5 division 1 college baseball.  That's basically like a freshman putting up 25/10/5.  Not 4 points a game.  Get outta here with your terrible Bronny James comparisons.  If people here were actually blinded by a last name then posters here would have thought that Ryan Ripken was a legitimate prospect.  Believe it or not some of us actually do research on things like this.  We certainly aren't alone in rating Holliday highly, as he was rated #1 or #2 overall by every publication I can think of (and #1 by most of them if I recall.) 4: Holliday for Miller, who isn't guaranteed to be healthy enough to be in the starting rotation over the course of his controlled years, is a ludicrous trade proposal and I'm glad you're not our GM.  You're trading Holliday for an ace.  And not just any ace, an ace without injury concerns with years of control left.  Someone like Chris Sale, when the White Sox traded him for Moncada/Kopech+.  Anything less than an ace is a terrible return.  And I get that Moncada was probably a bad #1 overall prospect, but even if you think Holliday is a bad #1 overall too, you're still undervaluing him to an absurd degree by settling for a reliever with injury concerns, even a shutdown one.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...