Jump to content

Rally and announcement 11/12?


SpringBarb

Recommended Posts

I really hope that's not the hat. I see no difference between that bird and the one we currently have.

There is plenty difference.

Nevermind the hotlink'd pics.

It is a cross between the current bird and the 90's bird

There is no real way to make an Oriole look "fierce" The angry bird is fun, but it is not an hat-logo type thing. It would look silly on hats.

I think we will see a "fiercer" bird on sleeve logos and such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 438
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If this is the case then why would ANYONE want the cartoon bird, 1988 and all?

The cartoon hat was worn from 66-88. It had the black front from 66-74. White front from 75-88. We had 4 losing seasons wearing that hat (67,86,87,88) out of 23 seasons. All 3 world champs used that logo.

I was excited about the brand new hats and uniforms in 1989. I don't dislike the hat we have now, I just think with 4 diiferent hats including the batting practice one you could somewhere use that logo that's all. I was 8 years old when we won in 83 and considering our recent history a little nod the historic past isn't a bad idea in my mind. How about an all black road hat with the cartoon bird? The logo never won us a game but the logo does have meaning to the fan base who are old enough to remember it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only changes I see is the feet, as others have noted, but also to the tail-feathers. On the new logo (if that's it), the tail-feathers are more upright.

Honestly, neither change is much to get excited about. Kind of pointless. Why change anything, if there going to be so miniscule.

I kinda expected this. I just hope they didn't screw the uniforms completely up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is plenty difference.

Nevermind the hotlink'd pics.

It is a cross between the current bird and the 90's bird

There is no real way to make an Oriole look "fierce" The angry bird is fun, but it is not an hat-logo type thing. It would look silly on hats.

I think we will see a "fiercer" bird on sleeve logos and such.

No it wouldn't. Just use the head image from this. It would be an update to the classic cap logo. <img src=http://www.oriole.net/~windy/almanac/baseball/bob/1968.gif></img>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just clicked the link and it says that the hat is currently unavailable. Is it possible they took it down after putting it up too early? And has anyone found it somewhere else since I have still not seen it?

Yep the hats are gone. Looks like the O's fixed another leak...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm New Era, I'm seriously displeased with the Orioles right now.

Instead of simply having deadstock wool 5950s with the old logo, now they're sitting on deadstock poly 5950s as well...and all this for a most minimal of logo changes! This might irritate them more than the 1998 "one year wonder bird" did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm New Era, I'm seriously displeased with the Orioles right now.

Instead of simply having deadstock wool 5950s with the old logo, now they're sitting on deadstock poly 5950s as well...and all this for a most minimal of logo changes! This might irritate them more than the 1998 "one year wonder bird" did.

You make it sound like the Orioles hat was a hot seller... :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm New Era, I'm seriously displeased with the Orioles right now.

Instead of simply having deadstock wool 5950s with the old logo, now they're sitting on deadstock poly 5950s as well...and all this for a most minimal of logo changes! This might irritate them more than the 1998 "one year wonder bird" did.

It's possible they knew early enough about the change in order to shift production. The change is subtle enough that the casual fan may not know they're buying old stock if it remains on the shelves a while longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I would be OK with this and it’s what Hyde was doing with Kimbrel in a way too. We’ve got guys that can match up, let’s try to take advantage. 
    • A 90 win season with Grayson missing at least 10 starts, Means and Bradish missing at least 20 each.  Throw in Tyler Wells missing most of the season and other injuries I think this team and its management has done well.  If just a little more healthy they could have had back to back 100 win seasons.  I am glad we have Mike Elias and Brandon Hyde leading this team.  
    • Some interesting things of note from https://www.samford.edu/sports-analytics/fans/2023/Sabermetrics-101-Understanding-the-Calculation-of-WAR. I pulled out the relevant areas: Fangraphs allocates 570 WAR for position players and 430 WAR for pitchers, while Baseball-Reference allocates 590 WAR for position players and 410 WAR for pitchers The major difference between fWAR and bWAR comes from the measurement of fielding runs, which is the defensive output a player provides. Fangraphs uses a statistic called Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR), while Baseball-Reference uses a statistics called Defensive Runs Saved (DRS). The differences in these stats can lead to drastically different calculations in WAR for some position players. UZR takes into account 3 years of players’ data as well as MLB data to determine these percentages, whereas DRS uses essentially 1 year of data. Therefore, some rookies will have drastically different UZR and DRS stats. As opposed to positional players, Fangraphs and Baseball-Reference take drastically different steps in calculating the WAR of pitchers. It does not follow the formula for position players but does try to calculate the “wins” that a pitcher gives to their team. Instead, they use a “base” statistic to help calculate WAR. Fangraphs uses FIP, or fielding independent pitching, as its base for calculating pitchers' WAR, whereas Baseball-Reference focuses on Runs Allowed per 9 innings (RA9) for its base I think the main takeaway for Gil, bWAR likes him more than FanGraphs probably because FG aims to take the defensive element out of the calculation by centering on FIP. And if we look at FIP, his is close to 4. But Baseball Reference is using RA9 which does have a defensive element inherently calculated. As for Cowser, I reckon FG likes him more than BBRef particularly on the defensive metric side of things. Maybe BBRef is harsher on the DRS side than FG is on the UZR side. To me, I like FG for pitchers far more than BBRef. For position players, I’d give the nod to FG but mainly because I think DRS can have some wide swings where UZR has a tendency to be more centered.
    • Win game 1, Kremer/Suarez game 2, win game 2, Eflin game 1 ALDS? Win game 1, Kremer/Suraez game 2, lose game 2, Eflin game 3? Lose game 1, Eflin game 2?
    • The win tonight in game 161 allowed the 2023-24 Orioles to reach 191 wins, tied with the 1964-65 and 1965-66 teams for the 7th most wins in consecutive seasons.  With a win tomorrow, they could move up to a tie for 5th. Tonight’s win also gave the O’s 275 wins over the last 3 seasons, tied for 11th with the 1975-77 and 1976-78 O’s.  They could move into a tie for 10th with a win tomorrow.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...