Jump to content

Rio DFA, Wilkerson brought up


eddie83

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Philip said:

Yes, he did, and praise God for that, but before then, when he was languishing at Bowie, that’s when he was delivering pizzas. I want all the long-term minor leaguers to get some time in the sun, I want them to be able to run out on the big field and take their four at-bats.

Caleb eventually did just fine, and I’m very happy for him. But he spent a lot of years before that call up, wondering where his next tank of gas was coming from.

LOL.  And I want YOU to be the Steve Buscemi you never were!  ?

db1de7e70d27488d54401d8eb74aff65.jpg

*

 

 

 

* I won't say it, I won't say it!  STFU Donny!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I'm pretty sure Caleb Joseph got well over 44 days, his pension and lifetime healthcare.  I would say Joseph had a pretty decent career as a backup catcher.

I’m curious what the economic value is of free health care for life? I.e., what is the cost to a team of providing that?   I’d be interested to know exactly how that is done.

Here’s something saying that average lifetime health care cost for a male is $268 k.   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1361028/
Figure the team missed paying for the first 20-25 years, but those are the cheapest.  So it’s gotta be more than $200 k per player.   

Based on that, you can see why it would be rare for a major league team to call up some minor leaguer for a cup of coffee just to thank him for his MiL service.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m curious what the economic value is of free health care for life? I.e., what is the cost to a team of providing that?   I’d be interested to know exactly how that is done.

Here’s something saying that average lifetime health care cost for a male is $268 k.   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1361028/
Figure the team missed paying for the first 20-25 years, but those are the cheapest.  So it’s gotta be more than $200 k per player.   

Based on that, you can see why it would be rare for a major league team to call up some minor leaguer for a cup of coffee just to thank him for his MiL service.   
 

Could be wrong but I doubt it is provided by the team. What happens if the player gets his cup of coffee with the O's and then is traded? Rio got his cup of coffee with the Braves. As an example, the O's called up Eddie Gamboa a couple years ago and he didn't even get in the game. I don't think that's a driving concern when it comes to promotions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Could be wrong but I doubt it is provided by the team. What happens if the player gets his cup of coffee with the O's and then is traded? Rio got his cup of coffee with the Braves. As an example, the O's called up Eddie Gamboa a couple years ago and he didn't even get in the game. I don't think that's a driving concern when it comes to promotions. 

It’s probably provided by MLB, but ultimately the teams pay a proportionate share.   Obviously, most promotions are based on an actual roster need, and this consideration doesn’t come into play.   I’m simply talking about “courtesy promotions” that are just done as a favor to the player.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I’m curious what the economic value is of free health care for life? I.e., what is the cost to a team of providing that?   I’d be interested to know exactly how that is done.

Here’s something saying that average lifetime health care cost for a male is $268 k.   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1361028/
Figure the team missed paying for the first 20-25 years, but those are the cheapest.  So it’s gotta be more than $200 k per player.   

Based on that, you can see why it would be rare for a major league team to call up some minor leaguer for a cup of coffee just to thank him for his MiL service.   
 

This is a couple years old, but offers some hints as to how this stuff is funded (through a roughly $3B fund via contributions by the teams).  And it looks like you don't get free health care for life for one day the in The Show, but an opportunity to buy into a health care plan at group rates.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

This is a couple years old, but offers some hints as to how this stuff is funded (through a roughly $3B fund via contributions by the teams).  And it looks like you don't get free health care for life for one day the in The Show, but an opportunity to buy into a health care plan at group rates.

That’s interesting.   I tried looking this up before and couldn’t find anything contradicting the common belief that players get free health care for life.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’m curious what the economic value is of free health care for life? I.e., what is the cost to a team of providing that?   I’d be interested to know exactly how that is done.

Here’s something saying that average lifetime health care cost for a male is $268 k.   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1361028/
Figure the team missed paying for the first 20-25 years, but those are the cheapest.  So it’s gotta be more than $200 k per player.   

Based on that, you can see why it would be rare for a major league team to call up some minor leaguer for a cup of coffee just to thank him for his MiL service.   
 

Gotta think the flexibility in jobs/career you pursue is an added bonus. He can start his own business without having to worry about the cost of health care. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, waroriole said:

Gotta think the flexibility in jobs/career you pursue is an added bonus. He can start his own business without having to worry about the cost of health care. 

I think all it means is that he doesn't have to go out and buy individual health care at exorbitant rates, but he still has to pay whatever the MLB policy costs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...