Jump to content

Your 2022 FA Wish List


Il BuonO

Recommended Posts

I have no idea when Elias would make a big FA splash, but just following the strategy from the last few years…

I think we need 2 SP’s and 2 IF’s to fill out the roster. One major league deal and one minor league deal(but with a great chance to make the roster). Off the top of my head:

1. Chris Archer

2. Matt Harvey

3. Matt Duffy

4. Tim Beckham 

 

Just the caliber of players I was thinking. Lots of other names that fit that mold. Although I could see management wanting an actual shortstop first player likes Galvis/Iglesias. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Matt Bennett said:

I have no idea when Elias would make a big FA splash, but just following the strategy from the last few years…

I think we need 2 SP’s and 2 IF’s to fill out the roster. One major league deal and one minor league deal(but with a great chance to make the roster). Off the top of my head:

1. Chris Archer

2. Matt Harvey

3. Matt Duffy

4. Tim Beckham 

 

Just the caliber of players I was thinking. Lots of other names that fit that mold. Although I could see management wanting an actual shortstop first player likes Galvis/Iglesias. 

Tim Beckham hasn’t played since 2019. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Matt Bennett said:

.279/.330/.545 in 45 AAA games in 2021. Always had an average major league stick. May not be much of a shortstop anymore though. 

I must’ve looked at ML only. Either way, I’d rather give ABs to someone like Mateo or Gutierrez. Beckham has no future here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, waroriole said:

Because they’re major league players. 

Loose term applied to Franco. No chance Beckham isn’t more of a ball player than him. 

But yes, every team needs major league players. They also need passable players beyond their starting 9 and 26 man roster. I think a Beckham like infielder should be/will be brought in on a minor league deal to fill a spot like that in addition to a more established major league regular infielder. This team did give 300 plate appearances to Pat Valaika. The idea would be to have those 300 be of better quality. Ideally they’re taken by major league ready prospects, but we seem to be light on that front at the moment. 

Matt Harvey, Wade LeBlanc, and King Felix didn’t think have a future here but were still brought in and didn’t block a soul. 

Just weird to deny any depth signing in Baltimore cause they don’t have a future here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matt Bennett said:

Loose term applied to Franco. No chance Beckham isn’t more of a ball player than him. 

But yes, every team needs major league players. They also need passable players beyond their starting 9 and 26 man roster. I think a Beckham like infielder should be/will be brought in on a minor league deal to fill a spot like that in addition to a more established major league regular infielder. This team did give 300 plate appearances to Pat Valaika. The idea would be to have those 300 be of better quality. Ideally they’re taken by major league ready prospects, but we seem to be light on that front at the moment. 

Matt Harvey, Wade LeBlanc, and King Felix didn’t think have a future here but were still brought in and didn’t block a soul. 

Just weird to deny any depth signing in Baltimore cause they don’t have a future here. 

Franco vs. Beckham isn’t exactly the battle of the Titans.   But Franco is three years younger and was coming off a pretty decent 60-game season in KC, whereas Beckham hasn’t played in the majors since 2019.   Franco was better in 2020 than Beckham was in 2019, and as I said, three years younger.   

I do think you’re right though that whether the player has a future in Baltimore isn’t really the test for some of these signings.   I certainly had no illusion that Galvis or Franco was a long term piece for us.   Galvis did his job, Franco didn’t.    That’s often the way it goes with these low-end signings.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/6/2021 at 10:37 AM, Hazmat said:

Per MLB TR, the Rockies are focused on re-signing Gray and the Padres are targeting Stroman.  

Let's add Andrew Heaney to the list of realistic SP options for the O's:

Kuhl, Velasquez, Quintana, Heaney

Please no on Heaney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Franco vs. Beckham isn’t exactly the battle of the Titans.   But Franco is three years younger and was coming off a pretty decent 60-game season in KC, whereas Beckham hasn’t played in the majors since 2019.   Franco was better in 2020 than Beckham was in 2019, and as I said, three years younger.   

I do think you’re right though that whether the player has a future in Baltimore isn’t really the test for some of these signings.   I certainly had no illusion that Galvis or Franco was a long term piece for us.   Galvis did his job, Franco didn’t.    That’s often the way it goes with these low-end signings.   
 

Right, and every major league team will make them every off-season. Whether they're contending or tanking. 

And their pedigrees are exactly why I said Beckham (or a player like him) would be brought in on a minor league contract whereas Franco was brought in on a major league deal. We will certainly need players other than Ramon Urias, Jorge Mateo, and Kelvin Gutierrez to fill the 2,000 plate appearances or so at 2B, 3B, and SS, even if those 3 are somehow all declared our starters on Opening Day 2022. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

There is no scenario in which signing Tim Beckham to play shortstop can be justified. I'd rather let Richie Martin sink or swim. Beckham was a bad defensive SS a few years ago and I doubt his defense has improved with age. 

Given my choice between Tim Beckham and Richie Martin, I’d probably jump off a bridge.   

That said, Martin hasn’t shown himself to be any better at fielding than Beckham, and he’s certainly the inferior hitter.   

I prefer Mateo to Martin by a wide margin.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

Given my choice between Tim Beckham and Richie Martin, I’d probably jump off a bridge.   

That said, Martin hasn’t shown himself to be any better at fielding than Beckham, and he’s certainly the inferior hitter.   

I prefer Mateo to Martin by a wide margin.   

 

I'd probably do the same. Mateo is also my choice since I don't see a legit free agent SS being signed this offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

There is no scenario in which signing Tim Beckham to play shortstop can be justified. I'd rather let Richie Martin sink or swim. Beckham was a bad defensive SS a few years ago and I doubt his defense has improved with age. 

Richie Martin has sank. No problem with him being one of the first cuts off the 40-man. 

Don't think anyone suggested we sign Tim Beckham to be our shortstop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • What do you mean starting for Slater? He is not a starter. The Ragans matchup makes things interesting because he has reverse splits. I don't know the numbers but they need to start the guys with good numbers vs Ragans and/or LHP changeups, whether they are LH or RH.
    • Perhaps. I'm just saying he could stop the Chiefs, the Raiders disaster, and the Cowboys debacle certainly gave me pause.  Last night they certainly looked better, but the first 3 games gave me pause. I think we'll know more after a full season.
    • 1. If the Orioles had signed Jack Flaherty, Seth Lugo and Chris Sale to bolster our pitching staff last off-season, this place would have gone ballistic, and not in a good way. 2.  The Orioles ended the regular season last year flat as a pancake, and it carried into the offseason.  This year, while under the pressure of trying to keep up with the Yankees, the team struggled mightily to find consistent offense and any overall consistency.  Once that pressure waned with us knowing our destiny, guys seemed to loosen up, and we saw the offense come back.  I thought that might happen.  However, my question is, after laying an egg in the playoffs last year and recent struggles despite the last two series, does the pressure of the postseason put us back in the funk we saw throughout most of August and September? 3.  I've seen a consistent theme in this forum over the past week or two which is this:  "All we have to do is get hot at the right time, like Texas did last year."  While I agree that's true, and want us to be that team this year, isn't that statement kind of an admission that without getting hot, we're not good enough on our own merits to persevere in the tournament?  And before I get crucified for saying that, I'll point to what everyone has witnessed in recent months:  Bad/inconsistent bullpen, inconsistent offense, questions about our starting pitching, defensive lapses and being prone to not showing up offensively.  And please, let's not act like some, or all of these, don't exist.   That all being said, Go O's!!!!!  Let's get hot!!
    • All of the October ones will.    Tomorrow good chance to be the least important one if things go any kind of good. Granted ~40% chance it is the only one, but that is short series baseball, not him. I won't have warm feelings if he handles these guys but is bad twice the next series.
    • Would be upsetting to start Slater in any playoff game at this point. Even if you think Mullins/Cowser cant hit LHP (news flash Slater cant either)- keep the defense and the guys who "got you there"
    • If the point was "Skubal is better" you kind of proved that for them. More innings, more K's, less ER, less Walks, less hits, better W/L. Across the board. Ragans is very very very good- but Skubal is better, and the runaway for AL Cy Young. Either is capable of shutting down an offense- and Ragans did just that earlier this year. But we also roughed up Ragans in the other start. No matter who we face, we're going to find things that make it tough, its the playoffs. Lets keep playing good ball and get payback for 2014. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...