Jump to content

Olney on O’s losing


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

This assumes a lot of things..main one being that if you add to the team that you are only adding to a 52 win team, which I think is bs.

And if you do spend that money and do better, maybe you have those guys in place and we celebrate a playoff appearance in 2022 as well.

Yes but JA has a lot less money in his poor mouth wallet.  How happy do you think JA was with not spending on free agents during those years? And how much of Elias relationship with Angelos would he have had to burn up to sign even middling free agents during the rebuild? 
Maybe the costs of revamping the organization were easier for Elias to get with the understanding about free agency signings? 

Edited by tntoriole
Link to comment
Share on other sites

About John Angelos...

Yes, he puts his foot in his mouth. Yes he's been very cheap and unnecessarily so. But I think it's fair to think he will raise payroll some over the next few years. He almost has to. It's just a matter of how.

If he's somehow able to keep Elias happy and here, and if he does approve a somewhat higher budget, I feel like Elias can make it work. I feel like Elias has set us up for 6-8 years more success after this year already, and I think he'll extend that window every year he stays. And that success means more $$$ for Angelos. His plan is working.

So Angelos isn't the worst ever. In fact, he chose this direction and these leaders. He's just not willing to go all in on it. Could be worse. Just look at his father's entire tenure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

About John Angelos...

Yes, he puts his foot in his mouth. Yes he's been very cheap and unnecessarily so. But I think it's fair to think he will raise payroll some over the next few years. He almost has to. It's just a matter of how.

If he's somehow able to keep Elias happy and here, and if he does approve a somewhat higher budget, I feel like Elias can make it work. I feel like Elias has set us up for 6-8 years more success after this year already, and I think he'll extend that window every year he stays. And that success means more $$$ for Angelos. His plan is working.

So Angelos isn't the worst ever. In fact, he chose this direction and these leaders. He's just not willing to go all in on it. Could be worse. Just look at his father's entire tenure.

There’s a lot to complain about with JA, but he made a great hire in Elias and he’s let him do his job.  Probably the two most important things an owner can do.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

About John Angelos...

Yes, he puts his foot in his mouth. Yes he's been very cheap and unnecessarily so. But I think it's fair to think he will raise payroll some over the next few years. He almost has to. It's just a matter of how.

If he's somehow able to keep Elias happy and here, and if he does approve a somewhat higher budget, I feel like Elias can make it work. I feel like Elias has set us up for 6-8 years more success after this year already, and I think he'll extend that window every year he stays. And that success means more $$$ for Angelos. His plan is working.

So Angelos isn't the worst ever. In fact, he chose this direction and these leaders. He's just not willing to go all in on it. Could be worse. Just look at his father's entire tenure.

He’s like his dad. Some things he’s good for, other things he’s not.

We need JA to stay with what he lets Elias do and sprinkle in some of the spending his dad did.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

He’s like his dad. Some things he’s good for, other things he’s not.

We need JA to stay with what he lets Elias do and sprinkle in some of the spending his dad did.

 

Yes, we will see about the spending, but as you pointed out, it could be a few years before he really needs to do much digging into his pockets.  The core of the team will be cheap for a while.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Yes, we will see about the spending, but as you pointed out, it could be a few years before he really needs to do much digging into his pockets.  The core of the team will be cheap for a while.  

Yea but they should acquire some talent that costs money and should be looking to do some extensions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Yes, we will see about the spending, but as you pointed out, it could be a few years before he really needs to do much digging into his pockets.  The core of the team will be cheap for a while.  

It's pure speculation on my part, and his public comments cast doubt on this, but I feel like success has to lead to payrolls beyond what his initial plan called for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When people (Buster Olney, et al) say "tanking is bad for baseball" or "the Orioles tanked for years," what do they mean exactly? 

To me, it means...  If your team is awful, you are still supposed to go out and try to sign the best free agents you can get to come here. Basically - go out and get the Aubrey Huffs and (insert name of marginal #5 starter) of the world, and try to scratch and claw to 75 wins.  Orioles fans lived that for years. There is really no point in doing this - in bringing in players who will not be part of your next contending team - other than to prove to everyone that you are not tanking. 

While it's easy for outsiders to label it tanking - I think those of us who have been watching every day see a team that completely rebuilt its systems, established mechanisms to sign and develop international talent, completely bought into analytics, drafted well (not just the top 5 picks) and developed from within. I love what this team has done, and if that is "tanking," or "bad for baseball," I do not care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

About John Angelos...

Yes, he puts his foot in his mouth. Yes he's been very cheap and unnecessarily so. But I think it's fair to think he will raise payroll some over the next few years. He almost has to. It's just a matter of how.

If he's somehow able to keep Elias happy and here, and if he does approve a somewhat higher budget, I feel like Elias can make it work. I feel like Elias has set us up for 6-8 years more success after this year already, and I think he'll extend that window every year he stays. And that success means more $$$ for Angelos. His plan is working.

So Angelos isn't the worst ever. In fact, he chose this direction and these leaders. He's just not willing to go all in on it. Could be worse. Just look at his father's entire tenure.

John has done better than the old man.  Agree!   Pretty unlikely that John alienates an AL Manager of the year shortly after he wins the award to the extent that he resigns his job. 

Edited by tntoriole
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, hallThalmt18h said:

When people (Buster Olney, et al) say "tanking is bad for baseball" or "the Orioles tanked for years," what do they mean exactly? 

To me, it means...  If your team is awful, you are still supposed to go out and try to sign the best free agents you can get to come here. Basically - go out and get the Aubrey Huffs and (insert name of marginal #5 starter) of the world, and try to scratch and claw to 75 wins.  Orioles fans lived that for years. There is really no point in doing this - in bringing in players who will not be part of your next contending team - other than to prove to everyone that you are not tanking. 

While it's easy for outsiders to label it tanking - I think those of us who have been watching every day see a team that completely rebuilt its systems, established mechanisms to sign and develop international talent, completely bought into analytics, drafted well (not just the top 5 picks) and developed from within. I love what this team has done, and if that is "tanking," or "bad for baseball," I do not care.

What they mean is that when you field a professional sports team the object of the game is to win and bring entertainment and joy for your fans, and there shouldn't be an environment where its advantageous to intentionally not win as much as you can for a number of years.

And I agree with that. MLB shouldn't have set itself up such that losing 110 games for 3-4 years is more advantageous than trying your best to win. It's ugly. We had to endure a lot of comically bad baseball the last few years. It drove off a substantial chunk of fans. Many came back this year, but many still haven't and may not ever.

Yes, in the context we have they did what they had to, and they did it very well. But there are other ways to run a league.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...