Jump to content

Baseball America #2 system


eddie83

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

My question is where would it be ranked without those 2.  

I think that’s more of a discussion point especially for the crowd that believes we are deep and Elias has done amazing things building the system.

Personally, I feel it would be in the 8-12 range without those 2 which is still very good imo….but those 2 definitely skew things.

And btw, that’s fine.  I would rather have the 2 elite prospects vs 5-10 Solid guys.  

Every team's placement in these rankings is likely to be skewed by their top 2 or 3 prospects.  But, I absolutely agree with you about preferring 2 elite over 5-10 solid prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OrioleDog said:

I hope Grayson starts 30 games next year and about 25 of them are in the Show, but it isn't inconceivable with a ball adjustment snag or an injury, he ends 2022 under 50 MLB innings.    Kjerstad 2022 will be like Mancini 2021 - playing at all will be its own success.

A next offseason list still with both high school pitchers, Kjerstad returned, Cowser developed and Green backfilling Rutschman I suppose isn't impossible.

I hear ya.  I prefaced the Kjerstad statement with an 'if', it's a huge question mark, but a lottery ticket that will be fun to watch play out.   I'm hoping for best case scenario that he's fully healthy and productive so it'll be like adding another first rounder to the system.  I'm assuming GRod is up next season killing his prospect status.   But with a productive Kjerstad,  1.1 coming in, Latin influence, and players from last two years drafts having success it seems the system could be in better shape next year than it is this year.   (this is a pipe dream scenario - the orioles give me nothing else to work with)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, RZNJ said:

You joke but his plan could be to go college pitcher heavy at the top of the draft.  You never know. 

I was only MOSTLY joking ?

It actually wouldn't surprise me if Elias selected 75% pitchers or more in the next draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, emmett16 said:

I hear ya.  I prefaced the Kjerstad statement with an 'if', it's a huge question mark, but a lottery ticket that will be fun to watch play out.   I'm hoping for best case scenario that he's fully healthy and productive so it'll be like adding another first rounder to the system.  I'm assuming GRod is up next season killing his prospect status.   But with a productive Kjerstad,  1.1 coming in, Latin influence, and players from last two years drafts having success it seems the system could be in better shape next year than it is this year.   (this is a pipe dream scenario - the orioles give me nothing else to work with)

Yes. Yes it is. 

I think the Orioles system could still be a solid this time next year, but if the team promotes Adley and GRod and loses both of them in the rankings, it will be hard pressed for the team to not slide back a few spots in the rankings even with a healthy Hall pitching well in AAA, a healthy Kjerstad tearing it up, Coswer rising quickly and the 1:1 pick. On the other side, if Hall starts showing himself as more of a reliever, or Kjerstad doesn't come back, or Cowser struggles at the higher levels, we could see a huge drop in the rankings even with the 1:1 pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chaka Garcia said:

I hoping guys like Jean Pinto, Coby Mayo, Rangel and Moises Hernandez make big leaps next year to make up the slack.

Moises Ramirez?

Stiven Acevedo and Mishal Deson also could factor in.   I suspect Rangel, Ramirez, Acevedo, and Deson will all be at Delmarva next year.    If Kjerstad comes back, plus one of the top 3 picks in the draft, the system could conceivable make up for the promotion of GRod and Rutschman although the system probably still drops with those two top heavy prospects gone from the list.      Plus, on paper, this will probably be a very strong J2 class as well.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Moises Ramirez?

Stiven Acevedo and Mishal Deson also could factor in.   I suspect Rangel, Ramirez, Acevedo, and Deson will all be at Delmarva next year.    If Kjerstad comes back, plus one of the top 3 picks in the draft, the system could conceivable make up for the promotion of GRod and Rutschman although the system probably still drops with those two top heavy prospects gone from the list.      Plus, on paper, this will probably be a very strong J2 class as well.

Next year's 1-1 should replace Grayson on the lists. 

As for the j2 class, what makes you think it will be "Very strong"?  I'm hoping they have worked their way up to "average". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Next year's 1-1 should replace Grayson on the lists. 

As for the j2 class, what makes you think it will be "Very strong"?  I'm hoping they have worked their way up to "average".

I said on paper and I meant relative to prior Oriole J2 classes based on the fact that we apparently are in agreement with a top 20 rated kid.  Whether it, or prior classes, are average, below average, or above average will be determined by time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I said on paper and I meant relative to prior Oriole J2 classes based on the fact that we apparently are in agreement with a top 20 rated kid.  Whether it, or prior classes, are average, below average, or above average will be determined by time. 

If we are talking about the Orioles farm ranking compared to other teams than I think we have to look at the J2 class compared to other teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me rephrase, counselor, as I get prepared for more cross examination.  Our system, on paper, will improve a bit with a stronger J2 class, on paper, than usual based on one of the highest bonus players we have ever signed there.  A J2 class probably has a negligible effect on farm system rankings in its initial year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

If we are talking about the Orioles farm ranking compared to other teams than I think we have to look at the J2 class compared to other teams.

I think that a deep dive into the J2 class would be fine.  But, international prospects are already included in the farm system rankings.  Those rankings are not simply a ranking of domestic draft prospects (Rule 4), but of all prospects currently in the system.  Hopefully, we will continue to sign better international prospects that will help our system to continue to produce high quality players for the Orioles or for use in trades.  We'll be better than #1.  We'll be #1'er.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, emmett16 said:

But with a productive Kjerstad,  1.1 coming in, Latin influence, and players from last two years drafts having success it seems the system could be in better shape next year than it is this year.  

Maybe not in some kind of cumulative statistical sense, but our farm system will be optimized when:

1. International prospects are at every level.

2. We have balance between hitting/pitching.

3. We have top flight prospects.

We'll take a step back in #3, most likely, but should be able to replace at least one of the top flight guys with the #1/2 overall pick. The international prospects will begin working their way into the FCL/Low A range, so that will improve. 

The question is pitching and whether Elias has a working plan for that. I don't have a clue whether his approach will work. We can only hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LookinUp said:

Maybe not in some kind of cumulative statistical sense, but our farm system will be optimized when:

1. International prospects are at every level.

2. We have balance between hitting/pitching.

3. We have top flight prospects.

We'll take a step back in #3, most likely, but should be able to replace at least one of the top flight guys with the #1/2 overall pick. The international prospects will begin working their way into the FCL/Low A range, so that will improve. 

The question is pitching and whether Elias has a working plan for that. I don't have a clue whether his approach will work. We can only hope.

I think it’s clear that Elias is letting other teams develop his future pitchers and going with hitters. I mean we spent top draft capital on all of one pitcher during his tenure and he immediately needed TJ. 
 

The system will stay top 5 even after AR and GR graduate because we will add the #1 overall pick, plus have the biggest bonus pool in 2022. I really don’t see next year’s team not giving yet another top 5 draft pick. The MILB system will be highly ranked for nice little bit of time. 
 

Also, we’re going to have the #1 pick in the rule 5 draft. That usually is a top 30 prospect. We’ll also likely add a 2nd player in the rule 5. 
 

We have the #1 waiver wire spot all offseason in the AL. That is huge. We might trade Mancini and Santander to add to our MILB system. We also just signed to players that appear to be consensus top 50 int’l players. 
 

The question is, when does all this make a difference at the MLB level?  2023?  2024?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Hopefully, Santander is Tuck’s replacement. He is worthy, and his hard work should be rewarded if there is room.  Kimbrel would have been nice, but Clay Holmes, when rested and healthy, has much better stuff. I know the numbers are poor for him at the moment, but he is nasty. Kimbrel is a gutty vet who used to be incredibly tough. His selection this year would have been about his career and legacy. That is not a popular take on this board, so be it. Westburg and Mountcastle can use the time off. Both are supposed to be fairly banged up at the moment. O’Hearn is just another guy I would have loved to see make it. A grinder, who exemplifies the blue collar fan base of Baltimore. A great story, but mostly a platoon guy.
    • Outside of any of the "snubs" losing out of any potential bonuses, I don't care. I'd almost rather see them getting a solid break mid season anyways. 
    • I think there is a better term than "angry" to describe some of the O's. Anger seldom results in anything positive. Now, playing with attitude is another thing. GH is certainly the "King" of attitude on this team, no one is going to beat him. I believe there are several position players that show attitude in different ways. Pitchers?? SP throw 90 or so pitches. They can't afford to display emotions or they would be worn out much earlier. They also can't afford to have the "deer in the headlights" look. Of the O's starters, I believe CP is in that world at present. It's mainly an experience and growth thing.  GR, IMO, has approved significantly in that department over the last year. 
    • On close examination of Kjerstad today (July 7), I hope he is not part of any trade package. This kid is a bull, with power potential that is off the charts.  He runs surprisingly well and that throw to the plate from left was very impressive, if a bit high. I can see him planted in left field for a long time, perhaps in a platoon with Hays the rest of the year, but eventually full time if he proves able to hit southpaws.
    • I like this idea better, but I am curious to what it would take to secure Mason Miller.
    • I totally get it.  It’s a huge risk vs. reward situation, but getting someone like him (if he’s still strong) or Skubal could make a major difference come October for you guys over the next three seasons.
    • IMHO it's not about whether Crochet is an "opener" or a reliever, it's the innings.  He's never thrown more than 65 innings (at college in 2019) in his entire college or pro career and stands at 105.1 today.  Let that sink in.  On top of that, there is Crochet's TJ surgery, where he missed all of 2022 and had multiple stints on the IL in 2023 as he was recovering, tossing a total of 25 IP. Does any of this mean he cannot throw double (130 IP) or triple (195 IP) his prior max?  No one can say for certain, but I'd think any reasonable person would agree that, at the very least, it's a far riskier proposition for someone like Crochet than a pitcher who has been a starter and has thrown 150+ IP before.  So, to recap: The most innings he's ever thrown was 65 IP in college (2019) After throwing 54 innings of relief for the White Sox in 2021, he missed all of 2022 with Tommy John surgery He followed up in 2023 by throwing a total of 25 innings of relief, as he dealt with a couple of IL stints recovering from TJ His first ever pro start came this season and he's been dynamite through 105.1 IP Elias and Sig are well aware of the risks and it will be interesting to see how it all shakes out.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...