Jump to content

162 games of Ryan Mountcastle


Frobby

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, jamalshw said:

Or 3B...or even LF. 

Still, he's a solid piece for the team. Once Adley is up and if the team can find someone for at least one of the infield spots this winter and the offense is certainly starting to come together and form something that is not too hard to get excited about in the next couple years. Now we need to start to see someONE similarly step up on the pitching side. 

Just ONE, please! More than one of course but for ONCE someone to really come up and dominate hitters. Just burst onto the ML screen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's amazing that he's still hovering around 1.0 WAR, a level that fangraphs deems "scrub". I get that his defensive position factors heavily into that, but to me a 1.0 WAR guy is far from a scrub. That terminology should be updated IMO. But also, it just goes to show how good he's going to have to be with the bat to provide value. I think he will, but jeez. 

https://www.camdenchat.com/2021/9/17/22678680/the-top-10-orioles-in-war-this-season-its-an-interesting-list

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Didn't get to see it last night when he did it.  That was a hell of a shot.  Didn't have him breaking Cal's rookie record for homers this year but I also shouldn't be surprised.  

It’s worth mentioning, I guess, that in 1982 AL teams averaged 0.92 HR per game, compared to 1.27 per game today.   And, Memorial Stadium was much more HR stingy than Camden Yards.  Mountcastle has hit 19 of his 29 dingers in the friendly confines of OPACY.   Cal hit only 11 of his 28 at home.   So, I think Cal’s 28 homers as a rookie was a more difficult feat than Mountcastle’s 29+.    Still, it’s a cool accomplishment that MC can be proud of.   

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/16/2021 at 2:09 PM, UMDTerrapins said:

That is interesting! Funny how two of our best Rule V picks were also not our top picks. 

Your list is also a reminder for me that it's not uncommon for guys to take 5+ years from their draft year to become productive ML regulars. I gotta keep that in mind with our current position prospects. I think I'm reasonable about my expectations for our prospects, but tend to think of them breaking through sooner than I ought to. 

Well, we did draft almost exclusively college guys this year, including some seniors and even a grad student.   Those guys should progress through the system at a faster than average pace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s worth mentioning, I guess, that in 1982 AL teams averaged 0.92 HR per game, compared to 1.27 per game today.   And, Memorial Stadium was much more HR stingy than Camden Yards.  Mountcastle has hit 19 of his 29 dingers in the friendly confines of OPACY.   Cal hit only 11 of his 28 at home.   So, I think Cal’s 28 homers as a rookie was a more difficult feat than Mountcastle’s 29+.    Still, it’s a cool accomplishment that MC can be proud of.   

I see where you're coming from, I also don't totally disagree.

But I do believe you're leaving out the fact that RMC is facing pitchers with better stuff, too.  I am assuming the average fastball velocity is significantly faster now than it was in 1982.  Part of that is how the speed was measured back then but I think we all should be able to agree that pitchers have overall better stuff now than they did back then.

Maybe that makes the environment a wash, maybe it doesn't.  It certainly is a more homer friendly environment overall, too.  Jackrabbit ball, hitters selling out for power, etc.  It's just a different game.  

Overall, I agree though..very cool accomplishment.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, interloper said:

It's amazing that he's still hovering around 1.0 WAR, a level that fangraphs deems "scrub". I get that his defensive position factors heavily into that, but to me a 1.0 WAR guy is far from a scrub. That terminology should be updated IMO. But also, it just goes to show how good he's going to have to be with the bat to provide value. I think he will, but jeez. 

https://www.camdenchat.com/2021/9/17/22678680/the-top-10-orioles-in-war-this-season-its-an-interesting-list

Maybe scrub is not the most flattering term, but you're not going to win many games if you base your team around 1 WAR players. 

Mountcastle has a 113 OPS+ and has had little defensive value, and has DH'd 40 times.  He has promise, he could be a fairly valuable player if he can manage to hit for a higher average and/or draw more walks while playing a decent first base.  He really needs to play first and OPS 125 or 130 or so.

But, yea, the bar is high for a 1B/DH.  It's really not hard to find a guy with little or no defensive value who can OPS+ 110 or so.  That's Pedro Alvarez as an Oriole, or Larry Sheets, Mark Reynolds, Javy Lopez, Aubrey Huff.  Guys who're willing to come to Baltimore for a couple years and $6-8M.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s worth mentioning, I guess, that in 1982 AL teams averaged 0.92 HR per game, compared to 1.27 per game today.   And, Memorial Stadium was much more HR stingy than Camden Yards.  Mountcastle has hit 19 of his 29 dingers in the friendly confines of OPACY.   Cal hit only 11 of his 28 at home.   So, I think Cal’s 28 homers as a rookie was a more difficult feat than Mountcastle’s 29+.    Still, it’s a cool accomplishment that MC can be proud of.   

That's important, but I think the bigger contextual difference is that Ripken was a 21-year-old shortstop, while Mountcastle is a 24-year-old 1B/DH.  I don't want to sound too down on Mountcastle, because I'm not, but those are epochal differences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That's important, but I think the bigger contextual difference is that Ripken was a 21-year-old shortstop, while Mountcastle is a 24-year-old 1B/DH.  I don't want to sound too down on Mountcastle, because I'm not, but those are epochal differences.

So are you saying I shouldn’t book my tickets for Mountcastle’s HOF induction ceremony yet?

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Maybe scrub is not the most flattering term, but you're not going to win many games if you base your team around 1 WAR players. 

Mountcastle has a 113 OPS+ and has had little defensive value, and has DH'd 40 times.  He has promise, he could be a fairly valuable player if he can manage to hit for a higher average and/or draw more walks while playing a decent first base.  He really needs to play first and OPS 125 or 130 or so.

But, yea, the bar is high for a 1B/DH.  It's really not hard to find a guy with little or no defensive value who can OPS+ 110 or so.  That's Pedro Alvarez as an Oriole, or Larry Sheets, Mark Reynolds, Javy Lopez, Aubrey Huff.  Guys who're willing to come to Baltimore for a couple years and $6-8M.

Yeah, for sure. And I get that. It's just like, would you call any of those players you named scrubs? I wouldn't. They're decent, if one-note, MLers. Anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/16/2021 at 12:54 PM, interloper said:

 

I'm just glad we can put the whole "BUT WHERE'S HE GONNA PLAY" thing to bed. He's a first baseman, and a real solid one, it turns out. At least solid enough that we don't mention his defense too much except to point out a nice play. I don't have any problem with him being at 1B long term. I like his athleticism over there, he's quick, he's made some really nice picks this year. He looks settled and comfortable now which, to your point, might be part of why he's clicked at the plate the 2nd half of the year.

Actually, at first, he’s pretty bad. At Baseball Savant, he’s ranked 27th of 35 first basemen with -1 runs prevented and -2 OAA. Trey is ranked 15, with zero/zero, which I guess is considered exactly average, and the leader is Rizzi with 6 and 8 respectively. Vlad jr is horrible, with minus 4 and minus 6 respectively, but I think he hits a lot better than MC. Yup, just checked… he hits a bit better than MC. With a WRC of 173 and bWAR of 6.1, the Jays are probably ok with lousy Defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...