Jump to content

Giants claim Hunter Harvey off waivers


SilverRocket

Recommended Posts

On the surface, I think it's easy to question this move.  It gives the Orioles space.  It saved no money.  Harvey has flashed brilliance and yet has been almost worthless because of his injuries.  He is exactly they type of talent the Orioles have hoped to have for years.  

On the other hand, results matter and if 2022 is about getting the ML team in a position to compete, then  any real evaluation of the 2021 roster would find very few guys worth keeping.  Harvey has simply not been worthy of a spot in spite of the potential.

If the Orioles do not replace Harvey with someone who performs much more reliably, then any gain on SF part will weave itself into our self loathing lore.  But, if this team signs pitchers or develops pitching in 2022 and begins climbing out of the abyss, then I think any real complaining here will be just normal handwringing. 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the order of operations between now and Nov. 20 when 40-man rosters get set matters a ton.

There is the dance of holding your bluffs longer hoping to exchange them for other stuff you want, whether a MLB fill-in or a lower minor leaguer, but activating minor pieces and moving some pawns to the center has some six of one/half a dozen of the other to it in opening sequences.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Philip said:

I wonder if Tate stays. That first-round luster sure has worn off. He hasn’t really put together anything.

And he wears his hat funny…

He will definitely stay.  He’s about a league average reliever and he’s cheap.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

Sure, but that seems unlikely to me.  

In a one for one, it’s unlikely.  But in a larger deal where he is the second or third piece, I think it’s possible.

Of course, that would mean Elias is trying to do “a larger deal” and that is unlikely.  That means he is actually trying to improve the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

In a one for one, it’s unlikely.  But in a larger deal where he is the second or third piece, I think it’s possible.

Of course, that would mean Elias is trying to do “a larger deal” and that is unlikely.  That means he is actually trying to improve the team.

I would love to be a fly on the wall during the discussions with the bosses, but at some point he’s got to put up or shut up, and for his own career it doesn’t make sense to a remain in a place where he’s not allowed to go all the way towards creating a winning team. I may be a hopeful pipe dreamer, but I think this could be a winning team this season.

If Means continues strong, AR And Rodriguez come up quickly, and we get One above average middle infielder and one above average starting pitcher, I think we can do well. I’m already calling us as finishing ahead of New York.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Harvey is the exact type of player that we should be claiming instead of DFA’ing. Just like when we claimed Mateo. He was a former top prospect that just never put it together. 

I don't disagree, but the guy spent 9 years in our system and tallied 23 innings in the big leagues. The Orioles should and will claim guys like Harvey but it was time to move on to people who can stay on the field. His last injury was triceps related and that's not a great sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Harvey is the exact type of player that we should be claiming instead of DFA’ing. Just like when we claimed Mateo. He was a former top prospect that just never put it together. 

Mateo was not injured for most of his career. Harvey was talented, but look back on his career stats. He was not really very good the past two years when he was healthy. Reliability is a big factor for relief pitchers. He could not go on back to back days. It was time to cut bait after nine years of waiting for him to come around. Besides, when SF DFA's him to stash him into the minors and no one claims him, he will have officially fallen off the map. You think we will win with guys that no one else wants? I don't. It's time to get serious about the major league team. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Outside of any of the "snubs" losing out of any potential bonuses, I don't care. I'd almost rather see them getting a solid break mid season anyways. 
    • I think there is a better term than "angry" to describe some of the O's. Anger seldom results in anything positive. Now, playing with attitude is another thing. GH is certainly the "King" of attitude on this team, no one is going to beat him. I believe there are several position players that show attitude in different ways. Pitchers?? SP throw 90 or so pitches. They can't afford to display emotions or they would be worn out much earlier. They also can't afford to have the "deer in the headlights" look. Of the O's starters, I believe CP is in that world at present. It's mainly an experience and growth thing.  GR, IMO, has approved significantly in that department over the last year. 
    • On close examination of Kjerstad today (July 7), I hope he is not part of any trade package. This kid is a bull, with power potential that is off the charts.  He runs surprisingly well and that throw to the plate from left was very impressive, if a bit high. I can see him planted in left field for a long time, perhaps in a platoon with Hays the rest of the year, but eventually full time if he proves able to hit southpaws.
    • I like this idea better, but I am curious to what it would take to secure Mason Miller.
    • I totally get it.  It’s a huge risk vs. reward situation, but getting someone like him (if he’s still strong) or Skubal could make a major difference come October for you guys over the next three seasons.
    • IMHO it's not about whether Crochet is an "opener" or a reliever, it's the innings.  He's never thrown more than 65 innings (at college in 2019) in his entire college or pro career and stands at 105.1 today.  Let that sink in.  On top of that, there is Crochet's TJ surgery, where he missed all of 2022 and had multiple stints on the IL in 2023 as he was recovering, tossing a total of 25 IP. Does any of this mean he cannot throw double (130 IP) or triple (195 IP) his prior max?  No one can say for certain, but I'd think any reasonable person would agree that, at the very least, it's a far riskier proposition for someone like Crochet than a pitcher who has been a starter and has thrown 150+ IP before.  So, to recap: The most innings he's ever thrown was 65 IP in college (2019) After throwing 54 innings of relief for the White Sox in 2021, he missed all of 2022 with Tommy John surgery He followed up in 2023 by throwing a total of 25 innings of relief, as he dealt with a couple of IL stints recovering from TJ His first ever pro start came this season and he's been dynamite through 105.1 IP Elias and Sig are well aware of the risks and it will be interesting to see how it all shakes out.
    • Gunnar doing a good job of hitting the ball to all fields.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...