Jump to content

The Ups and Downs of Major League Payrolls, 2000-2021


Frobby

Recommended Posts

I spent part of the long weekend looking at the payrolls of all 30 major league teams for each year from 2000-21.   My main goal was to get some insight into payroll volatility, i.e, the extent to which payroll for individual teams fluctuates from year to year.

First, a couple of basics.   The average team payroll was $56 mm in 2000, compared to $119 mm in 2021.   With one or two small hiccups, average payroll increased pretty steadily from 2000 to 2017, when the average reached $132.8.   But then it flattened out the next two years and actually dropped significantly in 2020-21.   2021 payrolls were back to below 2015 levels.    So, when you think about the coming labor negotiations, you can bet the players are not very happy at all with that trend.

The average payroll for the entire 22-year period was $97.5 mm, broken down as $76.2 mm for 2000-10 and $118.7 mm for 2011-21.   The Orioles were at $87.9 mm over the who period, $73.6 mm for 2000-10 and $102.1 mm for 2011-21.   The O's ranked 18th in payroll over the whole period, dropping from 15th in 2000-10 to 20th in 2011-21.

Now the part about volatility.   I looked at several different aspects, including teams dropping from a prior peak.   I found that every team in the majors had dropped its payroll below a previous peak by at least $20 mm at least once (either over a single year or over several seasons).   The average team did it twice.   The Rays and Indians have done it the most often, four times, with the Orioles, Dodgers, Marlins, Brewers and Rangers having done it three times.   Teams that have only done it once include the Braves, Reds, Angels, Twins, Mets, Yankees, Phillies, Giants and Cardinals.    

Besides how often teams have had a $20 mm+ drop, I also looked to see how high each team's biggest drop was.   On average, the 30 teams had a drop of $71 mm between their peak and a subsequent low point.   Seven teams had a drop of at least $100 mm between a peak and a subsequent low: the 2016-21 Rangers ($157 mm drop), the 2016-21 Tigers ($128 mm drop), the 2017-21 Orioles ($119.5 mm drop), the 2016-19 Blue Jays ($118 mm drop), the 2017-21 Mariners ($107 mm drop), the 2019-21 Indians ($102 mm drop), and the 2015-18 Dodgers ($100 mm drop).   As you can discern, drops that big have been a very recent phenomenon, and that is probably what drives the lower average payroll the last few seasons.   Of course, everything's relative; the DBacks dropping from $103 mm to $52 mm in 2002-07 was just as big a cutback relative to total payroll as a drop from $200 mm to $100 mm would be today.   20 of the 30 teams have had a $50 mm drop at one time or another, some more than once.

I think this data generally supports the theory that most teams sometimes "reach back for a little extra" when they are in a good competitive position, but then eventually need to retrench.    Obviously, not all go into drastric rebuilds; many are more modest adjustments.   The most stable team of all has been the Cardinals, who only had one $20 mm+ retrench, and that was only a very temporary $20.7 mm one-year drop before their payroll swung back up the next year.    They've done a great job of not getting out over their skis, while staying competitive almost every year.

There's also been several retrenches that were motivated by wanting to get below the luxury tax threshold for a year or two to get the tax rate reset at a lower level.   The Dodgers' $100 mm drop started from a high of $265 mm and over a couple of years they got down to $165 mm before reversing course and now they are back up to $257 mm.   Likewise the Yankees peaked at $258 mm in 2014 and then angled themselves down to $161 mm by 2018, and have been back in the $200 mm+ club the last three years.

Anyway, the bottom line is that all teams have their payroll ups and downs.   The O's are in a pretty extreme down mode now.   Hopefully they'll start seeing the other side of the equation soon.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Couple of things about what Mike said: 1).   Grayson will not start during the regular season.    Time has run out to build him up.   That means Burnes, Eflin. Suarez, Kremer and Povich the rest of the way if they can stay healthy.   Maybe Grayson as an opener or a reliever in the playoffs. Coulombe  as early as Friday.  I am guess either Smith or Kimbrel go. Westy and  Urias  on rehab  in the next few days.   Getting these guys back could be a  big mental boost for the team.  What level of performance they will be able to produce coming off a layoff is another things.      I would think Mayo and Holliday are optioned. Mountcastle is swinging but his wrist is still sore.   Where that goes in anyones guess.   If he comes back Jimenez will not be needed. 2).  When Mike says this has been a winning team for that last two years and he believes they can get back to that,  to me he is not just talking about the team.     He is talking about himself.    This is the first time Mike has experienced things not going the way he planned to this degree.    Quite frankly his looks a little shell shocked.    The pitching having troubles with injuries is reality to him.  Pitchers get hurt.    But his offense going from 5 runs per game in the first half  to almost zero is shocking to him.   He did not see that coming.  Adley, and O'Hearn were supposed to step up when needed.   Instead they took a step back.  None of Holliday, Mayo, or Kjerstad being able to help in the 2nd half was not the way this was planned.    Here is hoping the Westy, Urias and Kjerstad can help real soon.  
    • This board is smart enough to realize that the grass isn't always greener. The only way I see Hyde on the hot seat is if we miss the playoffs completely, which still feels very unlikely. Even then, I doubt he'd be fired during the offseason, but maybe. But then what? I don't think you give Buck Britton a shot at this roster. He's doing his thing and doing it well at AAA helping to develop guys. Could bring back Buck Showalter or Joe Girrardi, those sound like fun names. Or better yet, I bet everyone here with a torch and a pitchfork has their own little crystal ball with a short list of candidates ready to catch lightning in a bottle. 
    • The 4-run deficit was surmountable if we had more than one player who can hit the damn ball.   Kimbrel giving up six runs in the 9th may turn out to be a blessing.    
    • I wonder if last night was kind of a face saving tipping point though. Kimbrel and/or Eloy are easy famous names if Elias wants to "get serious" about optics. Not anything involving any of the long term chosen ones obviously.  
    • Really hoping the Minnesota series means nothing. I don’t care what seed they get right now..just get in. They aren’t any better at home than they are away. If you can have your spot clinched by Minnesota, I want to see them rest as many guys as possible for those games.
    • Parsing words I think "the testing of our depth" part is as close as Elias will come to critiquing Holliday and Mayo. I believe the club prides itself on its ability to prepare Bats to be ready to stay up, etc., but I do wonder if Sig Mejdal's "leading, bleeding edge" has made substitutes for actual MLB competition less effective than they have been in recent years. As awful as this run is, I've seen some comments a big off-season is ahead, but I'm not sure I agree.     There's nothing to do next April but play the guys you've planted your flag on.      Adley, Ryan, Holliday, Gunnar, Westburg, Cowser, Mullins, Kjerstad and Mayo is I think about as set an Opening Day lineup as you can find inching towards the winter.    Tommy Pham will be available for free next summer if somebody can't play. Certainly some interesting day to day calls for however long this year's ride the club can hold on for.    Prospect growth is not linear, and it still isn't impossible Holliday or Mayo will display some in the next 2 weeks.     Mayo can take dozens of at bats a day against Hurter with easy access to the Trajekt machine at home.
    • Mullins swing in a 3-2 count at a pitch that started at his shins and just was never a strike was telling. They are pressing beyond pressing, obviously. I'm just not seeing any spark from anywhere. They look tired.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...