Jump to content

Ryan Mountcastle's Most Similar Batters List


Pickles

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

So your threshold is top five in MLB?

Consistently?

Tough crowd.

 

Four players put up a 900 OPS at first in 2021.

Mountcastle's .335 wOBA was almost exactly league-average for a first baseman. If he's lucky he has 2-3 more years of growth and will end up being somewhat better than average.  His plate discipline will make it challenging to be a big asset, but he doesn't necessarily have to be that.  Teams win with just good players as most positions.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JD Martinez looks like a best case scenario comp.  Lots of Ks not a lot of BBs.  OBP is held up by his avg. & not a solid fielder.  Martinez  increased his power output as he matured.  If Mountcastle limits Ks a bit, increases walks a bit, and hits 35+ HR I think he can flirt with .850- .900 OPS through his peak years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Mountcastle's .335 wOBA was almost exactly league-average for a first baseman. If he's lucky he has 2-3 more years of growth and will end up being somewhat better than average.  His plate discipline will make it challenging to be a big asset, but he doesn't necessarily have to be that.  Teams win with just good players as most positions.

This is about as accurate as it gets. Mounctastle's plate discipline or lack there of will probably keep him from being a year in and year out super star, but he's going to be an above average first baseman when it's all said and done. 

Now, if he can find a way to hit offspeed better and improve his chase rates, he'll see his average improve and that will help his OBP. People sometimes forget how young he is and that he can improve. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

This is about as accurate as it gets. Mounctastle's plate discipline or lack there of will probably keep him from being a year in and year out super star, but he's going to be an above average first baseman when it's all said and done. 

Now, if he can find a way to hit offspeed better and improve his chase rates, he'll see his average improve and that will help his OBP. People sometimes forget how young he is and that he can improve. 

I’m pretty bullish.   He seems like someone who will learn with experience. He already drew more walks this season (41) than Adam Jones ever did (his high was 39, as a 30-year old).    Even modest improvements in this area will go a long way.   He doesn’t have to be Nick Markakis when it comes to plate discipline (and he won’t be).   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’m pretty bullish.   He seems like someone who will learn with experience. He already drew more walks this season (41) than Adam Jones ever did (his high was 39, as a 30-year old).    Even modest improvements in this area will go a long way.   He doesn’t have to be Nick Markakis when it comes to plate discipline (and he won’t be).   

If he starts doing more damage in the zone he will also start to get walked more because pitchers are going to be more careful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This might have already been suggested, and apologies if I missed it, but Mountcastle really reminds me of Mark Trumbo. Same size, same defensive limitations, same power when they connect...same plate discipline issues. Honestly if Mountcastle ends up with some Trumbo-esque years, I'll be okay with that. Once it became clear he is only viable at 1B/DH, he became less interesting to me and I hope he hits well to the point you can say "good enough".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CharmCityHokie said:

This might have already been suggested, and apologies if I missed it, but Mountcastle really reminds me of Mark Trumbo. Same size, same defensive limitations, same power when they connect...same plate discipline issues. Honestly if Mountcastle ends up with some Trumbo-esque years, I'll be okay with that. Once it became clear he is only viable at 1B/DH, he became less interesting to me and I hope he hits well to the point you can say "good enough".

Yes, I think Trumbo is a good comp.  I hope Mountcastle hits .270 instead of .249, which might allow him to be a 3-win player instead of a 2-win guy in good years.  But you really have to hit extremely well to be much above average if you don't bring much to the table fielding or baserunning and you walk 40 times a year.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’m pretty bullish.   He seems like someone who will learn with experience. He already drew more walks this season (41) than Adam Jones ever did (his high was 39, as a 30-year old).    Even modest improvements in this area will go a long way.   He doesn’t have to be Nick Markakis when it comes to plate discipline (and he won’t be).   

I agree.  I think he makes modest incremental improvements each year.  His confident approach, how he handles success, and how he handles failure really impress me.  Makes  me think he will not be satisfied until he gets every drop of of ability out of himself.  He will be a lot of fun to watch mature over the next 3-4 years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

If he starts doing more damage in the zone he will also start to get walked more because pitchers are going to be more careful. 

I think this is his ticket.  If does some more damage he’s going to get some freebies.  If he can get better on the close pitchers and get walk totals to 60-70 we will have a heck of a player on our hands.  That’s just 1 more walk per week in the grand scheme of things.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, CharmCityHokie said:

This might have already been suggested, and apologies if I missed it, but Mountcastle really reminds me of Mark Trumbo. Same size, same defensive limitations, same power when they connect...same plate discipline issues. Honestly if Mountcastle ends up with some Trumbo-esque years, I'll be okay with that. Once it became clear he is only viable at 1B/DH, he became less interesting to me and I hope he hits well to the point you can say "good enough".

I don’t think Trumbo had quite the same plate discipline issues, 37.1% O-Swing% vs. 41.6% for Mountcastle.  But, I agree they are similar.   I believe Mountcastle will end up being a bit better.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

I think this is his ticket.  If does some more damage he’s going to get some freebies.  If he can get better on the close pitchers and get walk totals to 60-70 we will have a heck of a player on our hands.  That’s just 1 more walk per week in the grand scheme of things.  

An increase of 1 walk a week is a lot.  A player only gets about 25 PA per week.   

I personally don’t think doing more damage is going to change pitchers’ approach much.   They already throw him strikes only 45% of the time, which is a low number.   And they do it because he chases a lot of pitches that aren’t strikes, so why throw him strikes?

To me, you and Tony have cause and effect backwards.   If he’s choosier with his swings, he’ll do more damage, and he’ll draw more walks.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

I think this is his ticket.  If does some more damage he’s going to get some freebies.  If he can get better on the close pitchers and get walk totals to 60-70 we will have a heck of a player on our hands.  That’s just 1 more walk per week in the grand scheme of things.  

It's not common for someone to start off walking in 7% of PAs and eventually get to 13% or more.  It can happen, but I think it's usually because the hitter has become really dangerous and pitchers much, much more cautious pitching to him.  Sammy Sosa, Chris Davis.

Alfonso Soriano started off walking in less than 5% of PAs. He eventually got as high as 9%, but that was in his best offensive season, and with the help of 16 intentional walks and probably quite a few intentional-unintentional walks.  His career rate ended up at 5.9%. Adam Jones, Salvador Perez, Mark Trumbo, all those guys may have improved a little, but nothing significant.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Are there any other qualifications other than signing a contract for 50+M?  A contract of that value spread over 3-4 years would give him a raise and make other teams give some consideration to sign him.  I think that's the only way a QO would work for him.  But I don't think they put him in jeopardy - altho the Orioles could match an offer, I suppose.  I think they value him pretty highly even if he won't command top money. 
    • I did say "unlikely" before "no matter what." Now that I re-read that though, it's kind of a bizarre sentence so I can see why you interpreted it that way. Of course there's a shot a player taken at 1-22 succeeds. Elias is certainly above average at drafting, possibly well above average, but the odds are still against him here, as they are for pretty much any individual pick he makes. I'm not trying to knock Elias here, just stating the fact that the vast majority of players selected in the back of the first round don't turn into solid regulars and so you shouldn't pass up someone you think is more likely to succeed here to draft "for need." I'm certain someone who will be available at this pick will have an incredible major league career. The odds are against it being whoever we draft though. That's just math.
    • I used to think we had a plethora of outfielders ready to replace the current guys, but not I'm not sure. Cowser is one. Does the FO trust Stowers? Heston is another as far as his bat goes, but how bad is the defense if you have Stowers, Cowser and Heston? How long before Bradfield is ready? Will Norby or Mayo move to the OF? Does that make it any better. If Santander has his typical year, I would give him the QO. So what if you have to pay him large for one year? It's not like our payroll is high right now.  
    • Or maybe he just is hesitant because he knows it’s best to give up a single than letting it get by you for a triple or inside the park homerun. I highly doubt Cowser gives a crap about WAR. There is nothing in the guy’s demeanor, personality, or anything that suggests he chases stats and places himself above the team. To say otherwise is quite ridiculous at best, and malicious at worst. He is a rookie and he will get more comfortable as he plays. With that comfortability will come trusting his ability more and more. Why even suggest a thing like you are suggesting? Just pathetic quite frankly on your part.
    • On the spot?  Maybe.   Even at full health, people would have accepted not winning the division because of the pace the Yankees are on.   We have a comfortable lead for the WC so if the Orioles can continue winning at a reasonable pace with Burnes/GRod/Kremer/Irvin/Povich/Suarez.   As far as the playoffs go, there’s only a few starters that inspire confidence in a playoff series that will be available.   Elias isn’t trading Holliday, Basallo, or Mayo.  He just isn’t.   He can get relievers without giving up top prospects.  The question is, can he get someone like Crochet without giving up those top 3?   Crochet, despite innings concerns, gives you a playoff starter plus someone who’ll be here after Burnes is gone. However, Crochet is an A.J. Preller type of move, not an Elias type of move.   If Povich looks the part of a ML starter AND no more starters go down, I could see Elias standing pat on the starters and fortifying the back end of the bullpen.
    • If a team that loses a qualifying free agent does not receive revenue sharing and did exceed the luxury-tax salary threshold the previous season, it is awarded a compensatory pick after the fourth round. San Diego Padres Compensation for Josh Hader. The Astros forfeited their second-round pick for signing Hader. San Diego Padres Compensation for Blake Snell. The Giants forfeited their third-round pick for signing Snell. Toronto Blue Jays Compensation for Matt Chapman. The Giants forfeited their second-round pick for signing Chapman.
    • If a team that loses a qualifying free agent does not receive revenue sharing and did not exceed the luxury-tax salary threshold the previous season, it is awarded a compensatory pick after Competitive Balance Round B.   Los Angeles Angels Compensation for Shohei Ohtani. The Dodgers forfeited their second- and fifth-round picks for signing Ohtani.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...