Jump to content

Unpopular Opinion - Goodbye 162 game Seasons


big_sparxx

Recommended Posts

  • big_sparxx changed the title to Unpopular Opinion - Goodbye 166 game Seasons
  • big_sparxx changed the title to Unpopular Opinion - Goodbye 162 game Seasons

I do think that the best way to accommodate the additional playoff round that MLB wants is to shorten the season to 154 games rather than to play into November. The extra round of playoffs is certainly worth more to MLB than 8 regular season games per team.

I also wouldn't mind seeing the return of scheduled Sunday doubleheaders (even if they were 7 innings) to allow for additional off-days. The amount of travel that players have to do is crazy. In 1962, when the schedule expanded to 162 games, there were only 3 teams west of Houston and no teams in the south east. Today there are 8 teams west of Dallas and three teams in the south-east and planes have not gotten any faster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If/when we get to 16 playoff teams, I could get behind shortening the 162 past 154 for more playoffs.

I think you can minimize the randomness with longer series if you transform 2-3 weeks.

Sure NL8 or AL8 might beat the Dodgers or White Sox, but if all rounds are 7 games and they still lose, that bothers me less than if Grayson Rodriguez and DL Hall just shove for two days against a team that just beat them by 24 games across 5-6 months.

The other idea I'd welcome for more best on best is growing the WS and/or LCS to 9 or 11 games.   

If MLB still wants the one-game wildcard adrenaline, the NBA pretty much gives the blueprint with the 7/8/9/10 stuff, and 20 "playoff" teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, MurphDogg said:

I do think that the best way to accommodate the additional playoff round that MLB wants is to shorten the season to 154 games rather than to play into November. The extra round of playoffs is certainly worth more to MLB than 8 regular season games per team.

I also wouldn't mind seeing the return of scheduled Sunday doubleheaders (even if they were 7 innings) to allow for additional off-days. The amount of travel that players have to do is crazy. In 1962, when the schedule expanded to 162 games, there were only 3 teams west of Houston and no teams in the south east. Today there are 8 teams west of Dallas and three teams in the south-east and planes have not gotten any faster. 

Move everyone into 3-4 geographically aligned leagues with little or no interleague play.  Nobody would ever have a regular season game more than one time zone away.  Players and fans would love it.  No more five hour plane rides to the West Coast, no more games ending at 2am Eastern Time, no Californians complaining about 4pm first pitches on a Tuesday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Move everyone into 3-4 geographically aligned leagues with little or no interleague play.  Nobody would ever have a regular season game more than one time zone away.  Players and fans would love it.  No more five hour plane rides to the West Coast, no more games ending at 2am Eastern Time, no Californians complaining about 4pm first pitches on a Tuesday.

I would love that. One home and home interleague series a year rotating between the other two-three leagues so fans could see their team on the road and I am sold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Just Regular said:

If/when we get to 16 playoff teams, I could get behind shortening the 162 past 154 for more playoffs.

I think you can minimize the randomness with longer series if you transform 2-3 weeks.

Sure NL8 or AL8 might beat the Dodgers or White Sox, but if all rounds are 7 games and they still lose, that bothers me less than if Grayson Rodriguez and DL Hall just shove for two days against a team that just beat them by 24 games across 5-6 months.

The other idea I'd welcome for more best on best is growing the WS and/or LCS to 9 or 11 games.   

If MLB still wants the one-game wildcard adrenaline, the NBA pretty much gives the blueprint with the 7/8/9/10 stuff, and 20 "playoff" teams.

Make it a double elimination tournament for the wild card teams.  Winner of the tournament faces the #1 seed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Moshagge3 said:

Does the "you can't afford to take your family to a MLB game anymore" crowd not have anything to say about the prospect of cutting the supply of games by 40%?

MLB would never follow the NBA/NHL model of half as many games, stadiums half as big, prices four times as much.  Would they?

You can sit in the bleachers at OPACY for, like $20, and at least before COVID bring in your own food and drink.  Cheapest ticket at a Caps game plus a hot dog and a coke has to be over $100, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/1/2022 at 10:02 AM, MurphDogg said:

I do think that the best way to accommodate the additional playoff round that MLB wants is to shorten the season to 154 games rather than to play into November. The extra round of playoffs is certainly worth more to MLB than 8 regular season games per team.

I also wouldn't mind seeing the return of scheduled Sunday doubleheaders (even if they were 7 innings) to allow for additional off-days. The amount of travel that players have to do is crazy. In 1962, when the schedule expanded to 162 games, there were only 3 teams west of Houston and no teams in the south east. Today there are 8 teams west of Dallas and three teams in the south-east and planes have not gotten any faster. 

If they ditch the WC card I doubt they will have to do this. Right now the Division round starts in one league on a Friday and the other on Thursday. Assuming we have a 3 game series that starts on a Tuesday it will be over by Thursday. My guess is they ditch the off day between games 4-5 of Division round- they have done this in the past/ and ditch a travel day off the LCS round. 
 

Not that I would be against cutting the regular season back a week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I don't think it is really the past 5 games.  It is the next 4 months, potential playoffs, and all of next year that has people concerned.  Remember these elbows aren't just taking guys out this year, but most of next year as well. And Burnes probably won't be around next either. 
    • It is just a real shame that the Os are going through all of these elbows.  Take away all of the elbows going back to last year with Felix and I would say the Os are a lock to get to the WS and would have a great chance to win it all. I haven't seen this many injuries from a teams top guys in such a short amount of time in maybe.....forever. I am starting to wonder if it is something the Os are doing as far as their training.   Trying to obtain too much spin, revs, and velocity. I am a big Colts fan and for years we have complained about all of the knee blowouts and hammy injuries they get when playing at home.  Finally the Colts realized that it might be turf related from their home field and replaced it this past spring.    
    • I've been a fan for a long time too but mostly remember a lot of near misses, not tailspin collapses. 2005 comes to mind (Raffygate, Sammy Sosa, Lee Mazzilli, et al.)... what other seasons are you thinking of, to create scar tissue?
    • I really like Kremer.  Seems like a good guy and a solid arm. But he is not going to be the guy to get you into the playoffs and he especially won't be a guy between a make or break WS championship. 
    • We can hope he’s back to being his #5 self, but he’ll now be a #3, and let’s all x the fingers
    • The 5 game losing streak is a 5 game losing streak.  I am not too concerned about that unless it turns into something bigger. Every team goes through it.  What I am concerned about is losing 3 starters and 2 great relievers since last August with not a lot to replace them other than Burnes.  And they won't even back for most of next year...if at all. Add in the fact that Burnes is more than likely leaving after this year?  Our cupboard pitching wise is pretty bare as it looks right now. So imo you absolutely need to trade some of your AA and AAA players to get pitching help now and for next year.  This team is too good to waste years on players like GH and AR. 
    • Trading Drew Rom for Flaherty was not a big swing. It was trading a maybe prospect for a “hope he’s ok” guy with three months before FA. I am increasingly convinced Mike won’t make any bigger move this season, and what we have is basically what we will have.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...