Jump to content

Jordan Lyles agrees to 1-year deal with O's


Natty

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Hope everyone realizes that the team with the best ERA in the AL last  season had three starters with ERAs over 5.00.  Yarbrough,  Wacha and Fleming.   And Tampa led the AL with 100 wins.

And  no Tampa pitcher  pitched over 155 innings.  

The O's one two punch of Grayson and Means will probably be better than any starter Tampa had last season.

The O's need more pitching depth but Lyles does not project to hurt the O's staff.  He projects to help it.

Great post & thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

Hope everyone realizes that the team with the best ERA in the AL last  season had three starters with ERAs over 5.00.  Yarbrough,  Wacha and Fleming.   And Tampa led the AL with 100 wins.

And  no Tampa pitcher  pitched over 155 innings.  

The O's one two punch of Grayson and Means will probably be better than any starter Tampa had last season.

The O's need more pitching depth but Lyles does not project to hurt the O's staff.  He projects to help it.

Good post, I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need enough pitching to cover 162 9 inning games (give or take a few innings). It has to come from somewhere. Lyles is a relatively inexpensive option, who isn't tying up money long term, and the Orioles can run out every 5th day without worrying about his development, load management etc 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not opposed to having Lyles to eat up innings, but at that price?

I've said it many times that I want this team to spend, and I don't care one bit about the profitability for the Angelos family...but couldn't we have him at half the price and use the money elsewhere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Oriole1940 said:

Maybe in a large NL park this would be  a hopeful signing, but in the AL East and  in this ball park, it confirms just how bad the Orioles pitching is expected to be.  

Don't forget we moved the fence back.  It's a veritable Polo Grounds now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Just now, SteveA said:

Roch's article in his blog today is titled "How Orioles lured Jordan Lyles to the organization".

Haven't had a chance to read it yet, but I assume it says "By paying twice his market value".

By giving him a ML contract.

They completely screwed this up as you see what other guys, namely Davies, are signing for. 
 

Even when they spend money, they still can’t get out of their own way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

By giving him a ML contract.

They completely screwed this up as you see what other guys, namely Davies, are signing for. 
 

Even when they spend money, they still can’t get out of their own way.

I think Elias had three goals.

  1. Get an established ML pitcher to eat a few innings.
  2. Make a show of spending some money before the lockout (I think it was suggested to teams to do so).
  3. Not get anyone good enough to actually improve the team in a meaningful way.
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think Elias had three goals.

  1. Get an established ML pitcher to eat a few innings.
  2. Make a show of spending some money before the lockout (I think it was suggested to teams to do so).
  3. Not get anyone good enough to actually improve the team in a meaningful way.

Exactly. They spent money to hopefully eat some innings and protect the bullpen but clearly it’s not an attempt at winning any games. Just keep the bullpen from getting overworked and collect $7 million. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...