Jump to content

Elias expects hitting to be good and pitching to struggle


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, glenn__davis said:

I heard Sig on one of the local radio shows talking about how they went through some crazy amount of data and felt like they saw some patterns/trends to prevent injuries.  What types of trends those were he obviously did not say, and of course we have no idea if their reasoning is sound.  As frustrated as I have been with the slow-playing of prospects I do at least believe they have some reason for doing so, whether I would agree with that reason or not.

I 100% believe some computer program told Sig to limit young pitchers. When I watch how other teams use their pitchers pitcher count wise and after injuries, most seem to have different approaches. We'll have to see how it all works out but the Orioles really, really taking things to the extreme. We're seeing 50 or 60 pitch, pitch counts and 3-4 innings on starts so far. Meanwhile, most other minor league teams seem to have an 80-pitch limit on their starters already. 

It's frustrating to not see guys like Hall and Baumler pitch at some level. Personally I believe they get more out of pitching in games then in sim games or throwing sessions. But again, the Orioles are slaves to the computer programs when it comes to usage of players. They don't take any of the mental part of it into consideration. It's very sterile from what I can see and have heard. 

It's like they treat every player like the same robot and if the computer program says they pitch this many pitches or play this position, then that's what happens. The program says picking pitches are risky so they barely pick them in the top ten rounds. Meanwhile the Delmarva pitching staff is awful with guys that don't belong in even A ball. 

I guess we'll see whether this all works or not, but I know I'm starting to have concerns on how they are developing pitchers. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I 100% believe some computer program told Sig to limit young pitchers. When I watch how other teams use their pitchers pitcher count wise and after injuries, most seem to have different approaches. We'll have to see how it all works out but the Orioles really, really taking things to the extreme. We're seeing 50 or 60 pitch, pitch counts and 3-4 innings on starts so far. Meanwhile, most other minor league teams seem to have an 80-pitch limit on their starters already. 

It's frustrating to not see guys like Hall and Baumler pitch at some level. Personally I believe they get more out of pitching in games then in sim games or throwing sessions. But again, the Orioles are slaves to the computer programs when it comes to usage of players. They don't take any of the mental part of it into consideration. It's very sterile from what I can see and have heard. 

It's like they treat every player like the same robot and if the computer program says they pitch this many pitches or play this position, then that's what happens. The program says picking pitches are risky so they barely pick them in the top ten rounds. Meanwhile the Delmarva pitching staff is awful with guys that don't belong in even A ball. 

I guess we'll see whether this all works or not, but I know I'm starting to have concerns on how they are developing pitchers. 

They're being extra cautious with the pitchers they have because they've only drafted 4 in the top ten rounds combined since 2019. Thats severely limiting the amount of pitching thats coming into the system and according to you its now showing in Delmarva. Im curious what they're next move is in this area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I 100% believe some computer program told Sig to limit young pitchers. When I watch how other teams use their pitchers pitcher count wise and after injuries, most seem to have different approaches. We'll have to see how it all works out but the Orioles really, really taking things to the extreme. We're seeing 50 or 60 pitch, pitch counts and 3-4 innings on starts so far. Meanwhile, most other minor league teams seem to have an 80-pitch limit on their starters already. 

It's frustrating to not see guys like Hall and Baumler pitch at some level. Personally I believe they get more out of pitching in games then in sim games or throwing sessions. But again, the Orioles are slaves to the computer programs when it comes to usage of players. They don't take any of the mental part of it into consideration. It's very sterile from what I can see and have heard. 

It's like they treat every player like the same robot and if the computer program says they pitch this many pitches or play this position, then that's what happens. The program says picking pitches are risky so they barely pick them in the top ten rounds. Meanwhile the Delmarva pitching staff is awful with guys that don't belong in even A ball. 

I guess we'll see whether this all works or not, but I know I'm starting to have concerns on how they are developing pitchers. 

Didn't the Redskins pick a whole bunch of Tight Ends one draft because their system kept saying a Tight End was the BPA?  Like guys, you do have a full roster you have to populate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

I guess we'll see whether this all works or not, but I know I'm starting to have concerns on how they are developing pitchers. 

Starting to? Lol. With our numbers the last 3+ years, concerned would be a massive understatment!

That said it seems Duquette/Buck get killed for being "old school" and failing to catch up in analytics, now Elias/Sig get killed for treating players like robots. I'm all for giving the analytics a try after the old school approach clearly wasn't working. I think they are headed in the right direction but it's really hard to know. It could be the Orioles are ahead of the game as it seems a lot of teams are starting to experiment with what it means to be a "starter". Could be a way to compensate for not spending draft picks on high risk/high reward elite starter types. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Starting to? Lol. With our numbers the last 3+ years, concerned would be a massive understatment!

That said it seems Duquette/Buck get killed for being "old school" and failing to catch up in analytics, now Elias/Sig get killed for treating players like robots. I'm all for giving the analytics a try after the old school approach clearly wasn't working. I think they are headed in the right direction but it's really hard to know. It could be the Orioles are ahead of the game as it seems a lot of teams are starting to experiment with what it means to be a "starter". Could be a way to compensate for not spending draft picks on high risk/high reward elite starter types. 

 

Well, the minor league pitching upticked nicely in 2019.   Then in 2020 there was no minor league season, but Akin, Kremer and Zimmermann all debuted somewhat successfully.  At that point I really didn’t have concerns about how the pitching development was coming along. 

2021 was a different story.   Akin and Kremer took big steps backwards, and Lowther, Wells and Baumann were very disappointing.   The bullpen went backwards.  And while there were some success stories in the minors, the lack of depth was pretty palpable.   We’ll see what 2022 brings, but when almost everyone you draft in the high rounds is a position player, it’s not too surprising that the pitching ranks are thin.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The relatively young, or at least inexperienced, relievers have been the stars of the first four games for me.  Perez, Bautista, Baker, Baumann and even Akin have shined out of the pen.  Promote Rodriquez, Bradish and Hall this year and I think our tunes may change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elias does not draft starters that he expects to make the majors.   He trades for them.

Bundy  for  Bradish, Brnovich and Peek

Sulser and Scott for Velez

Mancini and/or maybe Santander will be traded this year.  What do you think Elias is going to ask for in return.  You got it.  Starters in the minors.

I would not be a bit surprise to see Lyles is traded at the deadline.  Give Elias a minor league starter and he is gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Elias does not draft starters that he expects to make the majors.   He trades for them.

Bundy  for  Bradish, Brnovich and Peek

Sulser and Scott for Velez

Mancini and/or maybe Santander will be traded this year.  What do you think Elias is going to ask for in return.  You got it.  Starters in the minors.

I would not be a bit surprise to see Lyles is traded at the deadline.  Give Elias a minor league starter and he is gone.

You think a team is going to give up a future ML starting pitcher for a rental of Lyles?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • A RH power bat to stick somewhere in the 3-4-5 slots. I would see what the Giants might want in a trade for Heliot Ramos. He hit .370 / .439 / .750 against LH pitchers this year, and would look awesome in the middle of all our lefty batters.  
    • Early in the offseason and my opinions may change, but here are my thoughts at this time. 1st - I'm ready to move on from Mountcastle.  And O'Hearn should only be a platoon option.  I hope we sign someone like a Alonso or Walker who doesn't have massive L/R splits and who can play on a daily basis, regardless of who is on the mound, and make both Ryans expendable, and we trade them for whatever we can get.  Otherwise we probably keep the platoon going, with the Ryan's splitting based on the SP.  Unfortunately Mayo hasn't show anything in the majors to make me think he's ready to be a regular in the lineup yet.  That could change in the spring, but right now we can't plan on him. 2nd - This is Holidays spot to start the season.  We won't be bringing in any competition for this spot.  Holiday didn't earn it by his play, but his pedigree and the money/time invested into him will give him a pretty long leash, for good or bad.  If he falters Westburg may be moved off of 3rd to play here instead. SS - Gunnar is here.  We won't be bringing in any competition for this spot. 3rd - Westburg.  He should hold this spot down unless Holiday struggles, and then he might be moved over the 2nd.  We don't bring in any real competition for this spot. Util - I don't like it, but I expect us to keep both Mateo and Urias, though I'm not 100% sure if we think Mateo will be ready for OD.  If Mateo isn't expected to be ready then I can see us bringing in someone for this role, though I'm not sure who off the top of my head. C - Adley has this spot, though if we are going to continue to keep his load light, we need a GOOD backup.  And after Adleys struggles the 2nd half of the season, I'm even more concerned about the quality of the backup than I was before this year started.  I'm just not sure how many GOOD backups exist, and any of the really good catchers are going to want to start more than they would here.  I'm not sure Basallo is ready for MLB time, and after the struggles with Mayo and Holiday, we surely can't count on him even if he is on the mlb roster.  McCann could come back...I don't love that idea, but I could see it happening. OF - We start with Mullins, Cowser and Kjerstad, don't try to resign Santander unless he take the QO.  I'd LOVE to see us bring in someone good here (Soto would rock, but clearly isn't going to happen) maybe Pederson or Hernandez or something.  Spend a bit of money here and get someone who has a decent bat. So upgrade 1st base with a non-platoon player and bring in a good vet in the OF.  Say goodbye to the Ryans and Santander. Pitching - I'd love to sign a #1 like Burnes or Snell, but I think they get more years and money than we are willing to go.  I can see us being in on a Max Fried or Jack Flahertyt.  Also possible to see some of the lesser guys, the Andrew Heaneys of the world. Bullpen - I expect to see a few journeyman/low level signings.  With the controllable players we traded for this year and what is returning I don't see us signing anyone big for the bullpen.  
    • I think it’s pretty natural for kids to take special notice of the guys with speed who make exciting plays like steals and triples and defensive “web gems.” Seems like the kids now are higher on guys like Mateo and Mullins than the grownups, and I think that was the case with Brian Roberts back in the day too. As for clutch, in going through some of the clutch numbers, one guy who stood out as a possible fit for us is Alex Bregman. He has a career 144 wRC+ with runners on base and a .294 BA with RISP — I tend to care a little more about BA when a hit scores a run. His postseason heroics are also pretty well-known. Not sure what you’d have to pay him, and I’m pretty sure signing him would necessitate the Holliday-to-CF move. But if they’re not willing to play in the Soto sandbox financially, Bregman would be a veteran guy with championship pedigree and (importantly) ties to Mike/Sig that could put him near the top of their list. 
    • Just to be as clear as possible, when they were doing better early in the season, they were swinging more, not less. 4/1 - 6/30: 7.2 BB%, 49.3% swing rate, 29.8% out of zone swing rate, 22.2% whiff rate, .316 OBP 7/1 - 9/30: 8.7 BB%, 47.8% swing rate, 29.0% out of zone swing rate, 22.4% whiff rate, .315 OBP 2023: 8.4 BB%, 47.8% swing rate, 29.9% out of zone swing rate, 23.0% whiff rate, .321 OBP They took less walks early in the year, they swung more often at both balls and strikes early in the year, and their OBP/whiff rates were essentially identical in both halves.  The notion that they turned into free-swinging hackers in the second half — and that’s why they failed — seems to be pretty commonly held here, but it’s not backed by any data. They were actually more patient at the plate in this season’s second half than they’ve ever been during the Adley era.
    • Meant to say I wouldn't mind him managing the Orioles. I always liked him as a manager. 
    • It is a foolish hope to expect a full season out of Rodriguez. Kremer is fine, and I’m glad to have him. Suarez was better in most meaningful stats, but we don’t know what Suarez is going to do. He could possibly be just a flash in the pan. Povich is trade or depth. We need depth. Our 2025 -ready pitchers all have potential problems. but now we also need outfielders and infielders
    • A very good move as long as he is healthy. Surprised he wanted to come back. I would had mind here. A HOF manager
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...