Jump to content

DCab Stays Close. Signs One Year With Nationals


Elon Os Fan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Yeah if that is the case it doesn't make much sense.

Redding and Looper might be a bit better bet to stay a .5 or .75 run lower, but Cabrera has more upside than both of them combined, which should outweigh the difference in this case IMO.

UPSIDE? WADR Raven, what upside do you speak of? The only time I ever saw DCab control a pitch was at Jeter... or some Yankee I've forgotten. Started a beef. No brawl. :( I think Daniel served a suspension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Release DCab, meanwhile we're looking at Looper and Redding, crappy NL pitchers who will get rocked in the AL East. That gets the rolly eyes...

True, but DCab ain't going to be the savior of that mess. Good riddance and hope that AM has better irons in the fire than all three, or 4 or 5... :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cabrera has the upside to go out and dominate a team on any given night. He has the upside to pitch like a CY contender for stretches at a time.

The others do not.

If the numbers are ultimately going to be similar, why not go with the upside?

He also has the biggest "downside" of any of those pitchers. He could string together stretches in which he might pitch 20 innings over 4-5 starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently it's about one million less than we would have paid him. Personally, I'd rather have paid him than bring in someone like Redding. But that's just me. At least Cabrera has some upside. With Redding, it's a poor man's Steve Trachsel. :eektf:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently it's about one million less than we would have paid him. Personally, I'd rather have paid him than bring in someone like Redding. But that's just me. At least Cabrera has some upside. With Redding, it's a poor man's Steve Trachsel. :eektf:

What upside? He never improved his control and last year his stuff really tailed off. Stick a fork in him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think Daniel has great potential, and it was always a pleasure watching batters flinch every once in a while. But he never could hold a runner, not to save his life, and that's what was really tiring about watching him on the mound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...