Jump to content

Bullpen has been excellent.


DocJJ

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I'm skeptical that they'd get three decent-to-good prospects for a guy whose entire value is staked on 46.1 innings this year.

If the tables were turned would you give up, say, Westburg, Rom, and another lower guy for someone with Lopez' resume?  

Yes if I needed a closer! Like Tony said and he’s a controllable player not a rental. I was hoping for them to add Mancini and Ziegler to the trade but maybe he’s too much to ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

If I thought I was a World Series contender and was one reliever short, yes, I would. Plus Lopez is not a free agent until 2025 so he's not just a rental. 

If Elias can really get three top 20 organizational prospects for Lopez I'd have to seriously consider pulling the trigger.

Relievers are so freakin' weird. Last year the Orioles' pen had an ERA of 5.70 and this year it's one of the best pens in baseball and they didn't even go out and target anyone but reclamation projects to fix it. I wish I had confidence they could just come up with five good relievers from nothing every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick shout out to Bryan Baker, leading the O's in FIP. I feel like he has really come on as of late.  Every member of the BP is a leader in a stat to be proud of.

Lopez leads in Saves. Perez in Wins and ERA, Bautista in K/9, WHIP, and H/9, Baker w/ WHIP and HR/9, Tate with BB/9, Akin with IP, and Krehbiel doesn't lead in any category but has a great stat line all the same. 

No weak links in this BP right now, and now Vespi seems like he may have turned the corner too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's remember, it wasn't that easy to put this bullpen together. It just looks like it was easy.   Most of the key pieces were through waiver claims and players who were released, no?

Lopez

Bautista

Perez

Kriehble

Baker

All essentially for free, I believe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

They are just Nails, but we’re riding them hard. Wish DL Hall could give us a boost as another late inning arm. 

Either that or have him follow Austin Voth or Bradish when they start and just go 3-4 innings every 5 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

The bullpen has been shaky recently. It feels like we’re just now starting to feel the loss of Lopez, in that everyone seems to be slotted up into a slightly more important role.
 

I don’t know what the answer is because we need them to get 9-12 outs each night. Hall?  We’ve let some DFA guys/released vets go by that I thought could’ve helped. Maybe Wily Peralta that the Tigers just released?  Tyler Wells?

 

Gotta get back on track. It’s our blueprint to winning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The bullpen has been shaky recently. It feels like we’re just now starting to feel the loss of Lopez, in that everyone seems to be slotted up into a slightly more important role.
 

I don’t know what the answer is because we need them to get 9-12 outs each night. Hall?  We’ve let some DFA guys/released vets go by that I thought could’ve helped. Maybe Wily Peralta that the Tigers just released?  Tyler Wells?

 

Gotta get back on track. It’s our blueprint to winning. 

Well, I see Travis Lakins Sr made a rehab appearance for Bowie last night.  I never really had much faith when he'd come in, but maybe being healthy could mean he can help out now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, justD said:

Well, I see Travis Lakins Sr made a rehab appearance for Bowie last night.  I never really had much faith when he'd come in, but maybe being healthy could mean he can help out now?

I will pass on Lakins.  Rather take my chances with Hall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The bullpen has been shaky recently. It feels like we’re just now starting to feel the loss of Lopez, in that everyone seems to be slotted up into a slightly more important role.
 

I don’t know what the answer is because we need them to get 9-12 outs each night. Hall?  We’ve let some DFA guys/released vets go by that I thought could’ve helped. Maybe Wily Peralta that the Tigers just released?  Tyler Wells?

 

Gotta get back on track. It’s our blueprint to winning. 

They're definitely paying the price for the Lopez trade now. Some combination of Wells, Hall, or even GrayRod could be the answer, but it's just as likely that knocking away a key pillar of support from the team's biggest strength will prove to be the undoing of this wild card chase. Hopefully Povich turns out to be worth it. Although, it's worth pointing out that Lopez hasn't been as good in his first few games with the Twins as he was here. We'll see if that continues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, deward said:

They're definitely paying the price for the Lopez trade now. Some combination of Wells, Hall, or even GrayRod could be the answer, but it's just as likely that knocking away a key pillar of support from the team's biggest strength will prove to be the undoing of this wild card chase. Hopefully Povich turns out to be worth it. Although, it's worth pointing out that Lopez hasn't been as good in his first few games with the Twins as he was here. We'll see if that continues.

Comparison of Lopez to Bautista since the trade:

Lopez's 8 games: 3 three-out Saves / 2 Blown (one of which Twins eventually won); 2 winning non-save Finishes; 1 scoreless 9th before extra innings.

Change in ERA: 1.64 - 1.92. Team record: 6-2.

Bautista's 10 games: 6 saves, incl. a 4-out S and 5-out S / 0 Blown; 4 winning non-save Finishes.

Change in ERA: 1.65 - 1.68. Team record: 10-0.

The problem, as many have pointed out, is that the rest of the bullpen has not held up as well.

 

Edited by LA2
  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...