Jump to content

Keep Mancini Thread


NelsonCruuuuuz

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

But, if they receive a trade offer that is good for the future that should supersede them chasing the wild card a season or two early right. The trade might not appear more than the current value to the team when it’s made….so how would you gauge it? You have to trust Elias and he’s said he’s not giving guys away. 

I take Elias at his word.

And I also think that in the absence of a known quantity bat to plug in if Mancini was traded, he recognizes that Mancini has as great or greater a value to the Orioles as he does to most other teams. So the offer would have to be pretty good.

 i personally don't think the offers for Mancini will be as great as his value to this team.

So if I were to hazard a guess... I'd say he probably stays.

Not necessarily wishing for it as much as predicting it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

But, it’s an overpay by the Mets per year. 

It’s not the worst contact in the world.  Two year commitment, team option if he does well.   He’ll certainly earn his saiary this year, based on WAR valuations.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MarCakes21 said:

Yes, if you look at the straight numbers.  Or 3.7 in 2019, pre cancer, and 2.0 in 78 games so far this year.  So maybe he's actually a 4 win player currently.  So maybe you're actually buying into a 4, 3.5, 3 win player.  If I was his agent at least, that's what I'd be selling.

Luckily we don't have to look at the unrealistically optimistic scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Frobby said:

It’s not the worst contact in the world.  Two year commitment, team option if he does well.   He’ll certainly earn his saiary this year, based on WAR valuations.  

Well I quess it depends how much you think a win is worth. Canha is worth 1.4 so far and if you buy into a WAR for a fielder being 7 million then he will earn it. But, I’m not paying that for a 1B/DH type if im a GM. Also, I’m not sure how good Canha is defensively in the OF but he’s played no DH, 2 games at 1B, 63 in LF but also has a few in CF (5), and 6 in RF. So I don’t think he’s as defensively limited as Trey. BTW, the Mets are said to be looking for a DH so perhaps they are interested in Trea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

Well I quess it depends how much you think a win is worth. Canha is worth 1.4 so far and if you buy into a WAR for a fielder being 7 million then he will earn it. But, I’m not paying that for a 1B/DH type if im a GM. Also, I’m not sure how good Canha is defensively in the OF but he’s played no DH, 2 games at 1B, 63 in LF but also has a few in CF (5), and 6 in RF. So I don’t think he’s as defensively limited as Trey. BTW, the Mets are said to be looking for a DH so perhaps they are interested in Trea.

We all talk about "not paying that for a 1B/DH type".  @Frobbyknows an easy way to look, but are there really that many guys on league minimum with 2-3 WAR for a 1B/DH type?  Are they really a dime a dozen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MarCakes21 said:

We all talk about "not paying that for a 1B/DH type".  @Frobbyknows an easy way to look, but are there really that many guys on league minimum with 2-3 WAR for a 1B/DH type?  Are they really a dime a dozen?

A quick look down the fangraphs list lets me see Christian Walker, Ty France, Garrett Cooper, Patrick Wisdom, and Josh Naylor as the only guys who might be making less than Mancini but are a 1B/DH with similar WARs.  I didn't cross reference contracts.  So are they really a dime a dozen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MarCakes21 said:

A quick look down the fangraphs list lets me see Christian Walker, Ty France, Garrett Cooper, Patrick Wisdom, and Josh Naylor as the only guys who might be making less than Mancini but are a 1B/DH with similar WARs.  I didn't cross reference contracts.  So are they really a dime a dozen?

So … I think it’s probably the small and mid market teams that would be less likely to overpay a 1B/DH type. Probably shouldn’t have said overpay but I think more than 10 million of your money. He #16 payroll team is the Rockies at 95 million. I guess you could argue that it depends who else is getting paid on that team. But, would you really want to pay a limited defensive player more than 10% of your payroll?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

So … I think it’s probably the small and mid market teams that would be less likely to overpay a 1B/DH type. Probably shouldn’t have said overpay but I think more than 10 million of your money. He #16 payroll team is the Rockies at 95 million. I guess you could argue that it depends who else is getting paid on that team. But, would you really want to pay a limited defensive player more than 10% of your payroll?

I guess that's a good example and one I somehow missed.  They've got CJ Cron, signed at 7.5/year and found in a scrap heap a bit lucky.  So yea, if I knew I could get approx 3WAR for 10-15mil, I'd do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MarCakes21 said:

I guess that's a good example and one I somehow missed.  They've got CJ Cron, signed at 7.5/year and found in a scrap heap a bit lucky.  So yea, if I knew I could get approx 3WAR for 10-15mil, I'd do it.

Even if it’s 10% of your payroll and knowing that it’s for a DH/1B type? And you have Mountcastle plus you will be looking to save Adley by DHing him 2-3 days a week when you can find a better back up?

I wouldnt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Roll Tide said:

Even if it’s 10% of your payroll and knowing that it’s for a DH/1B type? And you have Mountcastle plus you will be looking to save Adley by DHing him 2-3 days a week when you can find a better back up?

I wouldnt

2-3 days a week of DH'ing Adley? That is really high. And I wouldn't DH him vs LHP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

Yes …. If Adley is your generation talent you can preserve him by not catching him 6 or 7 days per week.

Maybe not, but you catch him 5 and only use him as DH vs RHP. Give him a day off vs LHP. You don't draft an elite catcher 1-1 and DH them 30-40% of the games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Maybe not, but you catch him 5 and only use him as DH vs RHP. Give him a day off vs LHP. You don't draft an elite catcher 1-1 and DH them 30-40% of the games.

I’m not giving up on him yet vsLHP. I’d be okay with 5 days per week. Still not enough there to over a DH/1P on an overpay 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DirtyBird said:

What should our DH budget be moving forward?

It would depend on the payroll and the circumstances.

not 10% of our payroll 

I would hope to we can produce one of these every 4 or 5 year and move them when they get expensive. 
 

if I were in charge and could talk to Trey, I’d see if he’d accept 3 years at 7 or 8 million per. I’d think he take that deal as his girlfriend is established here and he likes the team. If he needs a spiff you could add some incentive stuff so if you had to pay more it would be at value for his production. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...