Jump to content

The Wild Card Race


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Well no, the average team debuts 6-8 players a year.   How many stick long term is another question.  Rutschman and Bautista look like definites.  We’ll see how many of the other six are in the majors a couple of years from now.  

Just as an example, in 2015 255 players debuted in the majors, 8.5 per team.  Only 71 of those players have played a game in the majors this year, 2.36 per team.   Here’s the list: mhttps://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/majors/2015-debuts.shtml

I believe the standard is a team with a good farm should graduate 2 regulars aka full time players a year.  Rutschman and Bautista are definites.  Stowers, Bradish and Vavra might end up as regulars too.  Guts like Vespi and Nevin are probably platoon/utility/middle reliever types and I wouldn't  count them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm conflicted for the nine TOR-TB games which team I hope to go 7-2.

The many head to head games left make Toronto easier to catch, plus we have a good chance in the season series in case of a ~86-76 tie as long as we stay reasonably competitive.    In a vacuum though, I think TOR stronger than TB.

Toronto probably needs to be four games clear of us after Game 159 to get to relax in the final Camden weekend.    

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I believe the standard is a team with a good farm should graduate 2 regulars aka full time players a year.  Rutschman and Bautista are definites.  Stowers, Bradish and Vavra might end up as regulars too.  Guts like Vespi and Nevin are probably platoon/utility/middle reliever types and I wouldn't  count them.

I haven't looked it up, but I'd guess the Orioles didn't graduate a single good, long-term regular in half the years since 1985.  Might depend on how you define long term regular.  Like the 2004 Orioles graduated Bedard and Cabrera.  Does Cabrera count since he made 155 starts for the team over five years but was mostly awful?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/26/2022 at 12:10 AM, ORIOLE33 said:

Looking at these upcoming schedules, TB and Seattle are our best shot. Toronto is in cupcake land for awhile. 

That is why you play the games.  So far Rays and Jays both lost first 2 vs Sox and Angels.  I wasn’t hoping this weekend wouldn’t see us lose 2 or 3 games in the standings with us playing the Astros and pretty much seal our fate.  At the very least we will be exactly where we were when these series’s started.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I'm kind of with you on this. Everything just feels like a crap shoot.  KC went and bought a bunch of 5th starters last offseason and might mess around and eliminate the top 2 AL East teams. 
    • With our second season of postseason futility behind us a number of posts have been made about the need for "players with postseason experience" to variously "calm, lead, guide, motivate," the younger players.  I've often suspected that this [postseason experience] is a much-overblown quality to guide our player acquisition efforts.  I realize the postseason, notably the World Series, is a mighty big stage on which to perform, but, between high school, college, and the minors, most of these players have played in some pretty big games under some significant pressure.   I finally ran across a data-driven article that set out to answer this question.  Published in 2002 in The Baseball Research Journal, Tom Hanrahan concludes it doesn't matter:   "Do baseball players fare better in the post-season when they have post-season experience behind them?  My research says the answer is a clear no.  Managers' efforts to build teams with players who 'have been there before' appear to be fruitless ventures, sacrificing money and possibly quality for no apparent gain.'"  What say you?  Is Hanrahan right?  Or is he all wet and the Orioles should go out and hire some wiley veterans who've "been there before" to get them over the hump?   https://sabr.org/journal/article/does-experience-help-in-the-postseason/#:~:text=Do baseball players fare better,quality for no apparent gain.
    • I disagree with your conclusion but I'm appropriating this line over the next couple of weeks:  "mega religious Lego playing softie white bread error machines."   🤣
    • What is crazy is that Soto won't be 26 for another couple of weeks.  Guy has been an absolute force on offense for 7 seasons already and he is almost a year younger than Adley.  There is always risk tied to the back end of big contracts, but I would hate to constantly pass on players like this just because we are always afraid of the next Chris Davis (who really fell off the cliff in his age 32 season).  I don't think we will be in play for a Soto type player anyhow, and I certainly understand that management has to focus on finances and the budgets. But as a fan, all I care about is winning games and October success. Whether the Os have a payroll of $50 million, $150 million, or $500 million, I really don't care as long as they bring a championship to Baltimore.  Flags fly forever.  
    • Is Britt the only good MLB journo at this point? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...