Jump to content

Marlins Open to Trading from Pitching Surplus


StillanOfan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I have no idea what the percentage is, but the way that Hall's control has been totally unreliable and completely absent at times, that might be a good estimate of his chance of being no more than just a bullpen arm.

Well him being a bullpen arm wouldn't mean he "couldn't make it in the majors".  Would you say Tate "couldn't make it in the majors"?

I think folks are being way too dismissive of Hall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I have no idea what the percentage is, but the way that Hall's control has been totally unreliable and completely absent at times, that might be a good estimate of his chance of being no more than just a bullpen arm.

From an outsider's perspective, I agree. I get he is a lefty that throws 95, but other than that, I don't know why you guys are so high on him, or his prospect ranking. I think he tremendously overrated. I do like Rodriguez though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Well him being a bullpen arm wouldn't mean he "couldn't make it in the majors".  Would you say Tate "couldn't make it in the majors"?

I think folks are being way too dismissive of Hall.

By just another bullpen arm, I mean someone like Krehbiel (sp?) or Baker.  A middle reliever type.  92% or some slightly lower percentage would include total failure to find a role in the majors or just be another middle reliever.  I'm sure that Elias is aware that Hall has a much higher chance of failure than being a shutdown closer or TOR starter.  He will include Hall in a trade if it's for a player he wants. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mavericksouth said:

From an outsider's perspective, I agree. I get he is a lefty that throws 95, but other than that, I don't know why you guys are so high on him, or his prospect ranking. I think he tremendously overrated. I do like Rodriguez though.

Have you looked at his raw stuff?  His K rate?  His athleticism?  His prospect ranking (for those into that)?

He's got four pitches that flash plus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OriolesMagic83 said:

By just another bullpen arm, I mean someone like Krehbiel (sp?) or Baker.  A middle reliever type.  92% or some slightly lower percentage would include total failure to find a role in the majors or just be another middle reliever.  I'm sure that Elias is aware that Hall has a much higher chance of failure than being a shutdown closer or TOR starter.  He will include Hall in a trade if it's for a player he wants. 

I'm glad you can mind read Elias.

For the record I think Elias would trade anyone if it is for a player he wants.

Why wouldn't he?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

So why bother specifying Hall?

I don't feel like endlessly arguing about nothing.  Hall is a top pitching prospect with a high risk of failure.  Elias should be open to trading him.  In the past, O's GMs have held onto pitching prospects until there is no doubt they can make it in the majors and they have lost any prospect status.

Maybe you should do something productive and get back to rowing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Have you looked at his raw stuff?  His K rate?  His athleticism?  His prospect ranking (for those into that)?

He's got four pitches that flash plus.

That's cool. I'm just saying as a fan of another team that has a plethora of arms, Hall wouldn't be in our top 10 of pitchers in our organization. I think he could turn into a nice lefty specialist/Bullpen guy. Needs to get proper development with the control issues he has. He kind of reminds me of what Braxton Garrett was before this year. Hall could turn into a good number four, but he is not going to be an Ace, imo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think we're saying the same thing, or at least we rhyme. If they're going to include one league that has completely different quality of play, why not all leagues? Why stop at the Negro Leagues?
    • Baseball is different from most other team sports in a number of key aspects: The number of trials. 162 games is a lot of games to have random variation smooth out. If you pick random 16-game stretches you'll have NFL-like outliers, such as teams going 15-1 or 1-15. Nobody goes 150-12. Pitchers are very limited in how much they can pitch. A 200-inning starter can only have so much impact. Hitters cannot get more than ~1/8th of a team's PAs. This and the prior point means that there's no way around having your 3rd- and 5th and even 14th-best players getting almost as much playing time as #1. So you end up with the most dominant teams usually not even winning 2/3rds of their games, wherein other sports you can have teams win 80% or more. Which makes baseball look more random. Contributing to this is the expanded playoffs, where a .600 vs .575 matchup is more-or-less a coin flip. I doubt most other sports have a situation where the obviously best team in the league has a 25%-ish shot of the Championship (in other words, a 75% chance of going home disappointed) on day one of the playoffs. In most soccer leagues the regular season champ is The Champ, so there's a 0% chance of that. The best team always takes a big trophy home.
    • He got rewarded for swinging at a ball at his ankles.  He might also be able to hit a fastball up around his neck for a home run.  If he consistently swings at those types of pitches it will be to his detriment over the long run.  
    • People really underestimate luck and randomness. Drungo is right….baseball is no different than any other sport.
    • Yandy Diaz' BABIP for his career is .320. Last year it was .367. While batters exercise a larger degree of control over their BABIPs than pitchers, there is still a lot of noise (i.e. luck) in the data. This year his BABIP is down about 90 points compared to last. I would bet that's about equal parts not hitting the ball as well, and not having the balls he does hit fall in.
    • I think it can certainly be part of the recipe. 
    • Sure. But isn't that like saying a player pitched 85 innings of relief with a 3.00 ERA one year, then the next year he pitched 220 innings as a starter with a 3.00 ERA. I wouldn't say that was a consistent, expected performance.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...