Jump to content

What is your grade for Elias after his 4th year?


emmett16

Recommended Posts

I honestly think in the cumulative it's hard to give him anything other than an "A."

This team was in a historically bad position when he took over.

And within three years was competing for the playoffs, had the highest ranked farm system, and had a future as bright as any in baseball.

I think anyone on this board would have signed in blood in Nov. 18 for this franchise to be in the shape it is now.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

OP's question is grade for "everything he has done to date, all things considered." 

I didn’t interpret it that way, because the last line asked for a “year 4 grade.”  But in any event, I’ve answered the question both ways by now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I agree with all that.  If I was grading everything Elias has done over 4 years to get the team to this point, I’d probably give a better grade than for 2022 alone, which is kind of ironic since 2022 was the year that the O’s shocked everyone by contending well into September.  

Man, you are a tough grader. I expect a very harsh assessment from SG, but everyone is entitled to their opinion. 😀 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I think sometimes on these "how do you grade" questions, many of us tend to define an "A" grade as meaning "perfect."  To me, "A" means excellent, not necessarily perfect.  Some nits can always be picked, but it is truly hard to imagine anyone having performed appreciably better than Elias has in his time here.  He gets an A from me.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I rate him A-. Along the line of SG's comment about doing more in the off-season to be .500 in 2022, to me the more telling "read" is what he did at the trading deadline. He removed pieces that were key in the O's success to that point and stood pat. Even then he judged the team to be not ready to compete for the playoffs. Sure, in hindsight, those pieces under-performed after leaving, but you can't assume the same if they had stayed. We still don't know what kind of trader he will be, otherwise he would be an A+ for his work to date.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aristotelian said:

Could anyone ever get an A?

Sure.  The Astros are established in the Intl market and producing well.  Farm system has been good. mL team elite.  
 

Not everything is going to work but it’s all about getting something out of everything and being very successful.

Elias isn’t there yet and btw, that’s not a dig at him.  That’s partly because of what he walked into in some instances and what he has to work with ownership wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well an A grade basically means there is no room for improvement. 

It’s hard to see that he can’t improve on things, especially at the ML and Intl level.

I think this is where I am which is why I went B+.  I wanted to give an A because of the historically bad situation he inherited, but at A  there isn’t any room for improvement.  I think we still haven’t seen this machine firing on all cylinders yet.  If Elias & Sig are still here after year 7 (which is when I have kind of penciled in the arrival of the International pipeline)  I think we will see what an A+ looks like.  By then I expect to have competed for a WS or two, signed a significant FA, made some significant trades, and witnessed success of Elias’ first Int star. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, emmett16 said:

I think this is where I am which is why I went B+.  I wanted to give an A because of the historically bad situation he inherited, but at A  there isn’t any room for improvement.  I think we still haven’t seen this machine firing on all cylinders yet.  If Elias & Sig are still here after year 7 (which is when I have kind of penciled in the arrival of the International pipeline)  I think we will see what an A+ looks like.  By then I expect to have competed for a WS or two, signed a significant FA, made some significant trades, and witnessed success of Elias’ first Int star. 

Right.  Again, it’s not a dig at Elias, it’s just more like he has more to do.

I’m looking at this grading in the overall scope of the job as a whole, not necessarily just on what he has done so far.

But even if I did look at it that way, I would still ding him down for how he approached the 2022 season.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Outside of any of the "snubs" losing out of any potential bonuses, I don't care. I'd almost rather see them getting a solid break mid season anyways. 
    • I think there is a better term than "angry" to describe some of the O's. Anger seldom results in anything positive. Now, playing with attitude is another thing. GH is certainly the "King" of attitude on this team, no one is going to beat him. I believe there are several position players that show attitude in different ways. Pitchers?? SP throw 90 or so pitches. They can't afford to display emotions or they would be worn out much earlier. They also can't afford to have the "deer in the headlights" look. Of the O's starters, I believe CP is in that world at present. It's mainly an experience and growth thing.  GR, IMO, has approved significantly in that department over the last year. 
    • On close examination of Kjerstad today (July 7), I hope he is not part of any trade package. This kid is a bull, with power potential that is off the charts.  He runs surprisingly well and that throw to the plate from left was very impressive, if a bit high. I can see him planted in left field for a long time, perhaps in a platoon with Hays the rest of the year, but eventually full time if he proves able to hit southpaws.
    • I like this idea better, but I am curious to what it would take to secure Mason Miller.
    • I totally get it.  It’s a huge risk vs. reward situation, but getting someone like him (if he’s still strong) or Skubal could make a major difference come October for you guys over the next three seasons.
    • IMHO it's not about whether Crochet is an "opener" or a reliever, it's the innings.  He's never thrown more than 65 innings (at college in 2019) in his entire college or pro career and stands at 105.1 today.  Let that sink in.  On top of that, there is Crochet's TJ surgery, where he missed all of 2022 and had multiple stints on the IL in 2023 as he was recovering, tossing a total of 25 IP. Does any of this mean he cannot throw double (130 IP) or triple (195 IP) his prior max?  No one can say for certain, but I'd think any reasonable person would agree that, at the very least, it's a far riskier proposition for someone like Crochet than a pitcher who has been a starter and has thrown 150+ IP before.  So, to recap: The most innings he's ever thrown was 65 IP in college (2019) After throwing 54 innings of relief for the White Sox in 2021, he missed all of 2022 with Tommy John surgery He followed up in 2023 by throwing a total of 25 innings of relief, as he dealt with a couple of IL stints recovering from TJ His first ever pro start came this season and he's been dynamite through 105.1 IP Elias and Sig are well aware of the risks and it will be interesting to see how it all shakes out.
    • Gunnar doing a good job of hitting the ball to all fields.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...