Jump to content

Who is left?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, oriolediehard said:

The Yankees are trying to buy all the best FA's. I feel angry that we have to be in the division with the world's richest team. How is it fair for us? In the other divisions don't have nearly as tough as we have.  We want Rondon, well so do the Yankees and money is no object. We have interest in Corea, well so do the Yankees and money is no object. The team with the most money is the best team money can buy.  What are all your opinions on this issue?

It's totally unfair but makes it more enjoyable when we win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, interloper said:

Conforto is a fun idea that I would support. If he's healthy and back to form he would do wonders for the lineup.

However, it would all but send Stowers to AAA assuming they prefer McKenna as the backup CF. 

4 man bench:

Backup catcher

McKenna

Vavra/UIF

Cordero or other 1B backup?

 

He could be 9th man as DH.

Rutschman C, Mountcastle 1B, Urias 2B, Mateo SS, Gunnar 3B, Mullins CF, Hays LF, Santander RF, Conforto DH.

Bench Vavra Stowers McKenna C

That said, Roch floating Harold Castro makes me extremely skeptical we are anywhere close to in on Conforto.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

He could be 9th man as DH.

Rutschman C, Mountcastle 1B, Urias 2B, Mateo SS, Gunnar 3B, Mullins CF, Hays LF, Santander RF, Conforto DH.

Bench Vavra Stowers McKenna C

That said, Roch floating Harold Castro makes me extremely skeptical we are anywhere close to in on Conforto.

So 3 of the 4 regular outfielders hit LH or SH.  Vavra plays IF and OF.  McKenna of course plays OF.   You really think they are going to carry Stowers as an extra OF in that scenario?    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

So 3 of the 4 regular outfielders hit LH or SH.  Vavra plays IF and OF.  McKenna of course plays OF.   You really think they are going to carry Stowers as an extra OF in that scenario?    

Hm, good point. Well, Stowers has reverse splits, as Tony keeps pointing out so he could be more like having a SH. Stowers could end up seeing more ABs with Hays on the weak side of the platoon or eventually being pushed to McKenna role. You could get rid of McKenna.

If Stowers goes to AAA, who replaces him? Cowser is also LH.

I do agree it is getting crowded. I have a feeling there will be some trades that affect some things. I see trading Hays as more likely than demoting Stowers but something is going to have to give in both infield and outfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Hm, good point. Well, Stowers has reverse splits, as Tony keeps pointing out so he could be more like having a SH. Stowers could end up seeing more ABs with Hays on the weak side of the platoon or eventually being pushed to McKenna role. You could get rid of McKenna.

If Stowers goes to AAA, who replaces him? Cowser is also LH.

I do agree it is getting crowded. I have a feeling there will be some trades that affect some things. I see trading Hays as more likely than demoting Stowers but something is going to have to give in both infield and outfield.

I agree on the trades as well.   I think Stowers is a prime candidate for trade.  I believe Urias and Stowers are good bets to be traded. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I agree on the trades as well.   I think Stowers is a prime candidate for trade.  I believe Urias and Stowers are good bets to be traded. 

This sounds good on paper, but the Orioles usage of him has decreased his value.

I also still think they trade Mateo over Urias to boost OBP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MarCakes21 said:

This sounds good on paper, but the Orioles usage of him has decreased his value.

I also still think they trade Mateo over Urias to boost OBP

I don’t think Stowers’ usage has affected his value much at all.  He was only only the roster for 52 days.  Any team trading for him would understand that he hasn’t had much chance yet to show what he can do.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I don’t think Stowers’ usage has affected his value much at all.  He was only only the roster for 52 days.  Any team trading for him would understand that he hasn’t had much chance yet to show what he can do.  

Yes, but we've decreased his value by showing that he doesn't have a spot here with significant playing time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MarCakes21 said:

Yes, but we've decreased his value by showing that he doesn't have a spot here with significant playing time.

More like we've decreased our leverage by signalling he is expendable. That shouldn't affect his actual value to another team. But maybe not playing Stowers was a 3D chess move to make Hays or Santander look more valuable. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, MarCakes21 said:

This sounds good on paper, but the Orioles usage of him has decreased his value.

I also still think they trade Mateo over Urias to boost OBP

Could be right on Mateo.  The big mystery is Henderson but Elias has given more hints of Henderson to 3B than SS.   They are now talking about Urias seeing a lot of time at 2B.   I think that is a giant clue that Henderson is going to be the 3B and Mateo the SS unless you think they'd make the bold move of Ortiz to SS or sign Correa or Swanson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Could be right on Mateo.  The big mystery is Henderson but Elias has given more hints of Henderson to 3B than SS.   They are now talking about Urias seeing a lot of time at 2B.   I think that is a giant clue that Henderson is going to be the 3B and Mateo the SS unless you think they'd make the bold move of Ortiz to SS or sign Correa or Swanson.

Mateo or Urias could be more of a trade deadline move in season if/when they are more confident Joey is ready. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Mateo or Urias could be more of a trade deadline move in season if/when they are more confident Joey is ready. 

Could be but I'd say Westburg, Ortiz, and Norby are all pretty close now.   I think they will make room for one (Westburg 2B) to start the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think there is a better term than "angry" to describe some of the O's. Anger seldom results in anything positive. Now, playing with attitude is another thing. GH is certainly the "King" of attitude on this team, no one is going to beat him. I believe there are several position players that show attitude in different ways. Pitchers?? SP throw 90 or so pitches. They can't afford to display emotions or they would be worn out much earlier. They also can't afford to have the "deer in the headlights" look. Of the O's starters, I believe CP is in that world at present. It's mainly an experience and growth thing.  GR, IMO, has approved significantly in that department over the last year. 
    • On close examination of Kjerstad today (July 7), I hope he is not part of any trade package. This kid is a bull, with power potential that is off the charts.  He runs surprisingly well and that throw to the plate from left was very impressive, if a bit high. I can see him planted in left field for a long time, perhaps in a platoon with Hays the rest of the year, but eventually full time if he proves able to hit southpaws.
    • I like this idea better, but I am curious to what it would take to secure Mason Miller.
    • I totally get it.  It’s a huge risk vs. reward situation, but getting someone like him (if he’s still strong) or Skubal could make a major difference come October for you guys over the next three seasons.
    • IMHO it's not about whether Crochet is an "opener" or a reliever, it's the innings.  He's never thrown more than 65 innings (at college in 2019) in his entire college or pro career and stands at 105.1 today.  Let that sink in.  On top of that, there is Crochet's TJ surgery, where he missed all of 2022 and had multiple stints on the IL in 2023 as he was recovering, tossing a total of 25 IP. Does any of this mean he cannot throw double (130 IP) or triple (195 IP) his prior max?  No one can say for certain, but I'd think any reasonable person would agree that, at the very least, it's a far riskier proposition for someone like Crochet than a pitcher who has been a starter and has thrown 150+ IP before.  So, to recap: The most innings he's ever thrown was 65 IP in college (2019) After throwing 54 innings of relief for the White Sox in 2021, he missed all of 2022 with Tommy John surgery He followed up in 2023 by throwing a total of 25 innings of relief, as he dealt with a couple of IL stints recovering from TJ His first ever pro start came this season and he's been dynamite through 105.1 IP Elias and Sig are well aware of the risks and it will be interesting to see how it all shakes out.
    • Gunnar doing a good job of hitting the ball to all fields.
    • Tell me the cost and I would probably sign up. What about you Qauntrill, Scherzer and Yates and you got to keep all top 4 prospects?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...