Jump to content

Have The O's Reached Out To Angel Reese To Throw Out The First Pitch For The Home Opener?


ORIOLE33

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Sanity Check said:

yeah, 3 days before opening day the O's are still wondering who they should get to throw out the first pitch.  She's a talent, but she was the 4th highest scorer on her team in the Championship....not like she beat Iowa on her own, she was just the most visible and controversial player in the game.  Maybe one day, but not Opening Day.

Of course she didn't win it on her own, who does? But she was the MVP of the Final Four if I'm not mistaken and she's local. I'd be surprised if she doesn't throw out the 1st pitch sometime this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ORIOLE33 said:

Since she's from Baltimore and we all know the rest, I was just wondering have the O's contacted her about throwing out the first pitch or do have they already given the honor to someone else? 

They certainly should (if they haven't already). From a PR perspective it would be a wise move since she has local ties, is in the news, s and has over 1 million Instagram followers. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, drdelaware said:

Female basketball player which is exactly why you don’t know her.  I didn’t either until they talked about some gesture after a game on the radio.  Guess they were looking for press.

I know a handful of names.  Honestly, I don’t know nearly as many male players as I used to, either.  Men’s college BB has gone way downhill over the last 25 years, with so many players leaving early for the NBA or transferring.  I think those phenomena are less prevalent in the women’s game. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I know a handful of names.  Honestly, I don’t know nearly as many male players as I used to, either.  Men’s college BB has gone way downhill over the last 25 years, with so many players leaving early for the NBA or transferring.  I think those phenomena are less prevalent in the women’s game. 

I'm not so sure about that. LSU just won the title and their 9 top scorers this year weren't on the team last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

So the Governor, who was here for 8 years and went through and beat cancer didn’t throw out the first pitch but the new Gov is?

Gee, I wonder why?

Probably because he didn't want to be booed.

I'm sure there will be some boos for Moore as well, pretty much every politician gets booed by some subset of the crowd when they throw out the first pitch.

Do you really think the Orioles wouldn't let the Governor throw out the first pitch if he was interested?

Edited by MurphDogg
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

Probably because he didn't want to be booed.

I'm sure there will be some boos for Moore as well, pretty much every politician gets booed by some subset of the crowd when they throw out the first pitch.

Do you really think the Orioles wouldn't let the Governor throw out the first pitch if he was interested?

I of course don't live in Maryland and haven't for some time.

Why would Governor Hogan have been booed?

He left office with a 77% approval rating.

That seems like an amazingly high number.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

Here's Larry Hogan seemingly enjoying himself on the field before an Orioles game in 2015.  Unfortunately, it doesn't appear as if he threw out the first pitch, which is just a out-and-out tragedy.

28f1ea5ed7af3829820f6a706700f4e0_c0-0-51

(That's Hogan on the right, in the back with the bald head.  The one on the left is the Orioles mascot.)

 

 

He looks like he's about to offer you thirty cents on the dollar for a Civil War Pistol that his expert just looked at.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I of course don't live in Maryland and haven't for some time.

Why would Governor Hogan have been booed?

He left office with a 77% approval rating.

That seems like an amazingly high number.

Do you know what 23% of a crowd booing sounds like?  😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...