Jump to content

Oscar Salazar removed from 40 man roster


jeffstonefan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 271
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Odd. I have to believe that MacPhail is only about half done making over this roster. Salazar was certainly a useful piece, but only if they didn't find a real 1B/DH, or they were going to carry a reasonably small number of pitchers.

That's the only way I'd support this move is if we are trading for a young 3B man or 1B man. We'll see but right now it looks really bad for a team that has no positional depth, especially at the corners to be giving it away...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He won't...

Just another stupid roster move by the Orioles who are too obsessed with pitchers.

Why the heck didn't we DFA Simon or Burres for crying out loud?

So who is going to defend MacPhail for this brilliant move?

Clearly the O's see the Brazell acquisition as making Salazar redundant. We're jammed up with AAA power hitters (Moore, Constanza, Brazell) at the corner infield positions and for whatever reason AM feels Salazar has the least value to the club.

It's dissapointing not to get to see more of Salazar at the big league level, especially given his winter ball performance, but I think calling it "stupid" is over the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to throw a fit over it, but I would have sent Burres packing before Salazar.

I agree with that.

Man, I'd love to be the O's GM. I'd totally make non-significant moves to the 40 man along these lines, shoot out a press release and then log on to orioleshangout.com and watch the puppets dance.

That'd be a great way to spend a dull Tuesday afternoon. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the only way I'd support this move is if we are trading for a young 3B man or 1B man. We'll see but right now it looks really bad for a team that has no positional depth, especially at the corners to be giving it away...

At the age of 30, he wasn't exactly a long term solution, in my humble estimation. I would have liked to have seen him get one more long look in spring training. That said, I'm wondering if the Wigginton talks are still ongoing. While not a long term solution either, Wig would me more production right now.

-Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearly the O's see the Brazell acquisition as making Salazar redundant. We're jammed up with AAA power hitters (Moore, Constanza, Brazell) at the corner infield positions and for whatever reason AM feels Salazar has the least value to the club.

It's dissapointing not to get to see more of Salazar at the big league level, especially given his winter ball performance, but I think calling it "stupid" is over the top.

Why would anyone think that? Salazar is a plausible, although definitely below-average MLB 1B. Brazell would be lucky to hit like the late career Tony Bautista - his strikeout and walk numbers look straight out of Cory Snyder's career, and that's in the minors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Odd is right. Can't say I'm pleased about this. I just hope he clears waivers - maybe McPhail has a hunch about this. I hope anyway. Where is Brazell (sp?) supposed to be playing? 1B at Norfolk or Bowie? Would they let Salazar go because of a log jam at Norfolk? Are they possibly considering moving Reimold to 1B for the Tides?

Honestly, I have no clue what to think here. But I definatley am in the give AM the benefit of the doubt camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't keep the details straight...

Sometimes you can pull a guy back from waivers if he gets claimed, and sometimes you can't.

Which is which?

The key is, he was removed from the 40-man roster to make room for Zaun... thus he will have to clear waivers to be kept by the Orioles.

from Cot's

A player designated for assignment is removed from his club’s 40-man roster and, within the next 10 days, traded, released or, if he clears waivers, assigned to the minor leagues. A club may not designate a player for assignment if the corresponding transaction is to recall a player on optional assignment.

* A player designated for assignment may be traded. A club interested in acquiring a player who has been designated for assignment may try to work out a trade before the player is placed on waivers, eliminating the possibility he might be claimed by a club with a higher waiver claim priority.

* A player designated for assignment who clears waivers and is not traded may be released. The player then becomes a free agent.

* A club wishing to send a player designated for assignment to the minor leagues must first place him on irrevocable outright waivers, making him available to the other 29 clubs in reverse order of won-lost record.

o If the player is claimed, he is lost to the claiming team for $20,000. (Irrevocable waivers may not be reversed.) The claiming team pays the player the major-league minimum salary for the rest of the season, and the original club is responsible for the balance of his contract.

o If the player is not claimed (clears waivers), the club may option him or assign him outright to the minor leagues, though he must continue to be paid according to the terms of his contract. A player may be assigned outright to the minors only once in his career without his permission. Thereafter, he may either 1) reject the assignment and become a free agent, or 2) accept the assignment and become a free agent at the end of the season if he’s not back on the 40-man roster. Additionally, player with 3 years of major league service may refuse an outright assignment and choose to become a free agent, regardless of whether he has been sent outright to the minors previously. A player with 5 years of major league service time who refuses an outright assignment is entitled to the money due according to the terms of his contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying Salazar is not expendable, it just seems like we could have found a better option out of this ginormous list of pitchers:

Matt Albers

Danys Baez

Brian Bass

Bradley Bergesen

Brian Burres

Jeremy Guthrie

Mark Hendrickson

David Hernandez

Jim Hoey

Jim Johnson

Radhames Liz

Brian Matusz

Bob McCrory

Kam Mickolio

Jim Miller

Troy Patton

David Pauley

Hayden Penn

Wilfrido Perez

Chris Ray

Dennis Sarfate

George Sherrill

Alfredo Simon

Chorye Spoone

Koji Uehara

Jamie Walker

Chris Waters

Wilfrido Perez???? He must have come aboard during the 7 hours I wasn't logged on to the OH last year. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems like many on this board are too quick to judge a decision made by the (new) front office.

IMO, a season with Andy is like a season of the Wire. Something that happens in episode 3 might not get answered (heck, even mentioned) until 2 or 3 episodes down the line.

Let the man work. The new look Orioles might be the next great thing to fill the void of the Wire ending.

I know Lester can get down with that logic. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...