Jump to content

Dodgers are getting desperate at SS


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

Just now, bluedog said:

I don't think the average fan is deciding whether or not to buy tickets based on Jorge Mateo. They are doing it based on whether or not the club is winning.

And I haven't suggested we trade Mateo for a prospect - I've suggested we trade him for a ML starter.

 

...and unless you can flip Mateo for a guy you can immediately insert into your starting rotation (which is a pipe dream) then it will not make the team better this season (i.e., less winning). If we're strictly talking about the Dodgers they don't have a MLB starter comparable to Mateo. Their pitching staff is also pretty thin with Gonsolin out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

How desperate are the Dodgers really though?  It's not like Betts isn't a freak athlete.  He's won GG's in the OF.  He's played baseball his whole life.  I'm sure Betts will be just fine and Rojas will come in as a defensive replacement.  Plus, we're contending.  Contending teams just don't trade away a SS like Mateo unless we'd be getting absolutely blown away with a SP offer.  

Serious question. If you could trade a 3.0 WAR SS and replace him with a 3.0 WAR SS from within your organization and in exchange you get a 3.0 WAR SP that fills a hole in your rotation, would you do that trade?

Edited by bluedog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HakunaSakata said:

...and unless you can flip Mateo for a guy you can immediately insert into your starting rotation (which is a pipe dream) then it will not make the team better this season (i.e., less winning). If we're strictly talking about the Dodgers they don't have a MLB starter comparable to Mateo. Their pitching staff is also pretty thin with Gonsolin out. 

Why is it a pipe dream that we can trade Mateo plus prospects for a ML SP?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think the trades he has made thus far prove your point.

He's yet to pull the trigger on a significant trade.

Would you consider Bradish deal significant?  I think it's trending to that territory.  Lopez trade has potential to as well.  But you statement remains correct as of today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm sticking with the fanbase isn't engaged enough for the backlash to be a problem.

Did the Orioles even have a fanbase over the last five years? I feel like there needs to be another term for it that indicates something significantly smaller. Either way, I think we can probably agree that the fanbase has been trending in a positive direction since the middle of last season and I think trading Mateo would flatline that trend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bluedog said:

Why is it a pipe dream that we can trade Mateo plus prospects for a ML SP?

This thread was specifically about the Dodgers. Who fits that profile on their team? Urias? Not a chance Mateo is enough. Kershaw? Too old. May? Probably untouchable (as he should be). Gonsolin? Injured and worth more because he's under team control for awhile. Syndergaard? Not really an upgrade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bluedog said:

Why is it a pipe dream that we can trade Mateo plus prospects for a ML SP?

I wouldn’t say pipe dream, but I doubt other teams value him all that highly right now. I think there’s probably more value in keeping him than any return we might get in a trade. We are probably better off trading someone like Ortiz around the deadline to a team that is selling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HakunaSakata said:

This thread was specifically about the Dodgers. Who fits that profile on their team? Urias? Not a chance Mateo is enough. Kershaw? Too old. May? Probably untouchable (as he should be). Gonsolin? Injured and worth more because he's under team control for awhile. Syndergaard? Not really an upgrade. 

I think a deal centered around May/Mateo would get my attention.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RarityFlaherty said:

I wouldn’t say pipe dream, but I doubt other teams value him all that highly right now. I think there’s probably more value in keeping him than any return we might get in a trade. We are probably better off trading someone like Ortiz around the deadline to a team that is selling. 

Cogent argument.

I always have a hard time with the "we value him more than anyone else does" bit though. Why would other teams value him less than we do, especially if they need a SS and we have a glut of them? And why would we value someone more than anyone else? Doesn't that mean we are being irrational in how we value the player?

If there was ever a candidate for the O's valuing a player more than other teams, I figure it would have been Mancini.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, emmett16 said:

Think you have to give up some more.  He has ~1 year of service time vs. ~3years May.  

Yeah earlier in the thread I said it would take Mateo + prospects to get any of the Dodgers starters. I don't disagree with you here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bluedog said:

Cogent argument.

I always have a hard time with the "we value him more than anyone else does" bit though. Why would other teams value him less than we do, especially if they need a SS and we have a glut of them? And why would we value someone more than anyone else? Doesn't that mean we are being irrational in how we value the player?

If there was ever a candidate for the O's valuing a player more than other teams, I figure it would have been Mancini.

Well, I’m more talking about us valuing him as fans. I don’t think we can get what we as fans think we can get for him. And I think there’s probably more value to us with him on the team, than what we could get for him in a trade. Personally, I’d like to see if he can keep hitting. I’d be willing to risk him regressing and getting nothing for him to be able to see what kind of player he could be. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone noticed that Bobby Miller has a sore shoulder, missed ST completely and has not pitched in a game so far this year.   Or that Gavin Stone has a 7.20 ERA in AAA this season.

I don't think Elias is anywhere close to trading Mateo.    He is trying to win this season.  So Mateo is helping the odds on that.   He doesn't even know if he needs another starter.   Gibson, Wells, Bradish,  GRod and Kremer with Means ready in July may be better than what he can trade for.   If that does not turn out to be true he may be interested in trading at that point.

Edited by wildcard
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Holliday went 1 for 2 with 3 walks on Friday night. 2024: .444 OBP, .911 OPS MiLB Career: .447 OBP, .931 OPS His OBP is EXACTLY what this O's team needs, would fill a key offensive weakness at 2nd base, help grind opposing pitching, and magnify the power up and down the lineup.  It's all dependent on his ability to throw and play 2B at a passable level. If Holliday starts to hit at the ML level, the question of who bats leadoff is over for the foreseeable future and we can go back to complaining about 1 slumping hitter or backup catcher at the bottom of the lineup.
    • This. We literally have no lineup holes right now, and Mayo, Norby, Jax lurk. Any trade discussion should center around the four most essential and crucial elements to O's success for the balance of the regular season and playoffs: 1. pitching 2. pitching 3. pitching 4. damn, forgot the 4th one. oh yeah, its pitching.
    • All I know is that Suárez has earned at least one more start, after today.
    • Scherzer still looks like a guy who would be a nice add to our rotation in the second half if the Rangers are sellers. 
    • Not happening. I don’t disagree, but Kremer will be slotted in the rotation.
    • I wouldn’t either but the word here is that he’s going back to rotation . Suarez supposedly the one  to be moved to bullpen . I think they should wait and see if Irvin can rebound . If Irvin can’t match Suarez’s work, then he should be moved to bullpen 
    • Yes that’s what I was asking. COC was completely off base in his comment. Judge is a great player, and apparently a nice guy. I have nothing against him, or most Yankees, for that matter, though Gil’s tats are off putting. I am expecting a bit of pro Yankee bias, but that’s ok. Also, home runs is a very glittery stat, and might sway some folks. But it should be Gunnar, at least based on the first 81.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...