Jump to content

After 47 games, a historical comparison


InsideCoroner

Recommended Posts

Here is how this year’s club stacks up in terms of win/loss record against some historical Orioles teams at the same point in the season:

1966: 30-17

1969: 32-15

1970: 34-13

1971: 28-19

1979: 30-17

1983: 26-21

2023: 31-16

 

Solid company. If we can win two of three in New York, I think I’ll start mixing up my own batch of Kool-Aid.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SilentJames said:

Not to be a downer, but 

2005: 30-17

 

So now lets talk about what makes the 2023 team and org different from that team

Steroids.

 

Seriously though, l believe the starting pitching is better, along with the bullpen. Obviously there's a lot of talent in the MiL's that could potentially reinforce the team this season, or be used for trade.

 

I remember Javy went down with an injury on that team. That kind of thing is unpredictable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

Steroids.

 

Seriously though, l believe the starting pitching is better, along with the bullpen. Obviously there's a lot of talent in the MiL's that could potentially reinforce the team this season, or be used for trade.

 

I remember Javy went down with an injury on that team. That kind of thing is unpredictable.

I think the Minors are the big thing right here. 2005 they got off to a great start and just couldn't sustain it and there were no reinforcements. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, SilentJames said:

Not to be a downer, but 

2005: 30-17

 

So now lets talk about what makes the 2023 team and org different from that team

That was the year I think the O's pitching suddenly looked very good (in the early season).  Was it a Bedard injury that started the downward spiral?  I checked the offense and it was Mora and Tejada and not much else.  This year's offense seems much more broad based.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SilentJames said:

I think the Minors are the big thing right here. 2005 they got off to a great start and just couldn't sustain it and there were no reinforcements. 

I agree. The 2005 team was "all in", and when they started to crumble there really wasn't a way to slow it down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

That was the year I think the O's pitching suddenly looked very good (in the early season).  Was it a Bedard injury that started the downward spiral?  I checked the offense and it was Mora and Tejada and not much else.  This year's offense seems much more broad based.

That was probably Bruce Chen's best season, and the same could probably be said for Cabrera. 

 

A lot of players had their last good year on that team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, InsideCoroner said:

Here is how this year’s club stacks up in terms of win/loss record against some historical Orioles teams at the same point in the season:

1966: 30-17

1969: 32-15

1970: 34-13

1971: 28-19

1979: 30-17

1983: 26-21

2023: 31-16

 

Solid company. If we can win two of three in New York, I think I’ll start mixing up my own batch of Kool-Aid.

A sweep in Toronto wasn’t good for a little Kool-Aid?  Not to mention 2/3 against TB. This team is legit, regardless of what happens in NY. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, SilentJames said:

Not to be a downer, but 

2005: 30-17

 

So now lets talk about what makes the 2023 team and org different from that team

But, that team topped out at 14 games over .500, a figure it reached several times, the latest being at the 70-game mark.  This team is further over .500 (+15) than that team ever got.  I don’t think this team has proven anything yet but I’m supremely confident that they’re much better than that 2005 team.  

I’ve been thinking about the 2016 team. That team got to +18 on July 25, but never got any higher and finished at +16.  The 2013 team got to +14 on July 22 but finished at +8.   Last year’s team got as high as +10 but finished +4.  So, there’s a long way to go before we know how things will shake out for this team.  The teams that are memorable tend to be ones that had a strong finishing kick.  Here’s the record of the WS teams in the last 47 games of the season:

1966: 24-23

1969: 29-18

1970: 35-12

1971: 32-15

1979: 28-19

1983: 33-14

That ‘66 team kind of coasted in, but the others didn’t.   This year’s team won’t be able to afford to, I suspect.

 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

I think the depth of this team in its position players will keep it in contention should any slumping occur. We can replace with players waiting in AAA.

The bullpen is going to keep the O's in a lot of games even if the rotation really falters. I can't see a really bad stretch because the bullpen will keep the O's in almost every game, and the offense has to come back in almost every situation (obviously down 10-0 in the 3rd is almost never happening).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

.

 

I remember Javy went down with an injury on that team. That kind of thing is unpredictable.

To be honest, there’s one player on this current team who a major injury to would absolutely destroy this team. Gotta just hope it doesn’t happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...