Jump to content

Anyone tried the Immaculate Grid game?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Yes that was definitely the best guess for the 500/O's square.   I didn't think of him, I went with Raffy figuring he was less associated with the O's than Eddie or Frank.  

20 minutes ago, Frobby said:

My O’s 500 guy was Thome, and I figured few would remember he ever played for the O’s.  

 

I tried Sosa.

Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today I learned Expos can count as Nationals.

I took my first miss on the Nationals HOF square half giving up with a Frank Robinson guess in case managers got to count.    The answer key had a lot of Montreal it hadn't occurred to me would have been okay.

Now I want to do George Sisler some Orioles day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Today I learned Expos can count as Nationals.

I took my first miss on the Nationals HOF square half giving up with a Frank Robinson guess in case managers got to count.    The answer key had a lot of Montreal it hadn't occurred to me would have been okay.

Now I want to do George Sisler some Orioles day.

I had to cheat a little. The only National I could think of who might have made it is Ryan Zimmerman, who doesn't seem like a Hall of Famer, but looked up the HOF criteria and then when I typed Zimmerman's name in the box I could see when he popped up that he hasn't been retired long enough. That meant it has to be all Expos. 

Now my question is do Expos still count as Nationals for the purposes of players overlapping franchises, or just for the HOF question? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

I had to cheat a little. The only National I could think of who might have made it is Ryan Zimmerman, who doesn't seem like a Hall of Famer, but looked up the HOF criteria and then when I typed Zimmerman's name in the box I could see when he popped up that he hasn't been retired long enough. That meant it has to be all Expos. 

Now my question is do Expos still count as Nationals for the purposes of players overlapping franchises, or just for the HOF question? 

My understanding is the Expos count for any Nats related box. I’ve used several Expos the few times the curly W has shown up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today I got 9/9, except for the fact that when I typed in the name of my Blue Jays all star, some other player popped up and I clicked it before I realized it.  So, I checked my real answer on my wife’s device and it scored a 2%.   136 rarity score nothing to write home about, but l’ll take it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9/9 with an 81 rarity score this morning.  For some reason it was really easy, didn't have to think too much about these guys.  I maintain that the more you play this game and the more names you remember over time, the easier it gets.  Also maybe since it's a Sunday morning and I'm not preoccupied with my day job, it's a little easier to think about this.

Spoiler

Steve Carlton, Bill Swift, Juan Marichal

George Foster, Kevin Mitchell (Immaculate Grid All-Star), David Cone

Jose Canseco, Tino Martinez, Whitey Ford

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Spy Fox said:

For me it's Colorado. I swear the Rockies are such a weird organization, nobody who played for that team ever played for any other team. 

1 hour ago, Spy Fox said:

For me it's Colorado. I swear the Rockies are such a weird organization, nobody who played for that team ever played for any other team. 

Arenado

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Let  Westy  play 3B vs right handed pitching and LF vs left-handed pitching.    Urias can play 3B vs lefties.   This is only needed if Cowser can't hit lefties. Mateo and Westy can be platoon in the outfield IMO.
    • O'Neil seems like a perfect fit if he doesn't cost too much in years or dollars.   
    • I don’t think we choked. Stubborn as hell. We literally went down with the same sinking ship philosophy that we had the entire 2nd half of the season.  The young guys just have to adjust. I mean getting completely shut down for 5 post season games has to wear on them. If it doesn’t, then we were never built to win. 
    • Right now the 2025 OF has three LHH OF in Cowser, Mullins, and Kjerstad. I’m not sure what the bench makeup of this team will be, but it looks like we’ll need 1-2 RHH options.  We could bring Slater back on a small “Tony Kemp” like 1 year deal or a milb deal.  With Santander leaving, and Mateo back to being in the CF mix once healthy, do we go with a more COF RHH type? Trades are a possibility as well, but here is a list of upcoming RHH OF Free Agents,    
    • I actually didn't suggest a reliever as the return, that was SG. I was thinking more about trading veterans to acquire pitching prospects, probably lower level lottery tickets. I'd rather pick up ML roster pieces through free agency (assuming of course that Rubenstein will allow a significant payroll boost.).
    • Each player is different. Each player may have a somewhat different hitting philosophy, based on their strengths and weaknesses. Not everyone is a “power hitter.” I would not coach a Tony Santander the same as a Jordan Westburg, or a Jorge Mateo, or a Cedric Mullins. Some should be more selective, while others may need to do more damage and it’s ok for them to K more because the power payoff is worth it. Some should have a more oppo approach, while others may need to try to pull the ball more. The Waltimore certainly has messed with many of our RH bats.  Being a hitting coach is a lot of work, and it is usually not often a position held for many years. They seem to often be a scapegoat when the players do not hit. I wonder what drove the players to swing more at pitches they probably should not have. I seriously doubt it was Ryan Fuller. Hitting coaches have a general philosophical approach, like Fuller would have hitters learn to take pitches they cannot hit well, with less than 2 strikes.. He wanted them to swing only at pitches they can do damage with. They do not dramatically change. For the Orioles to become much more free swinging, that must have driven Fuller to leave. So be it. Going forward, they probably need to be somewhere in between the previous two years. In the playoffs, they get pitched to differently. It’s higher intensity. You have to be proficient in putting the ball in play. You have to be able to take what the game gives you, and execute. There is no excuse for repeatedly having runners in scoring position with less than two outs and repeatedly not being able to get them home. Bases loaded, no outs, hitters 2,3 and 4 coming up…we have to score there. The approach was to hit a grand slam. Awful baseball. A ton of talent on this roster, and something has to change. 
    • I have been pretty happy with Kjerstad's defense in the outfield corners.   Not that I want him in left at home.     I agree with what Elias said about Mayo's body type being more suited for 1B.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...