Jump to content

Hicks activated, Cowser optioned


MurphDogg

Recommended Posts

I knew this was going to be the move, but it is still frustrating. Over his last 80 plate appearances, Hicks has a line of .203/.300/.304 and unlike with Cowser's similarly poor MLB line, I have two plus years of data with Hicks that suggest it isn't going to get much better.

Hopefully Cowser takes advantage of playing every day at Norfolk and gets back into a groove over the next couple weeks.

I don't understand bringing Hicks back at this point. I can't really see him making the playoff roster as he doesn't have a single elite skill at this point in his career. I would certainly rather have Kjerstad and McKenna on the playoff roster over Hicks. Can probably carry Ortiz as well, since you don't need close to a full 13-man pitching staff, given all the off days.

Edited by MurphDogg
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

I knew this was going to be the move, but it is still frustrating. Over his last 80 plate appearances, Hicks has a line of .203/.300/.304 and unlike with Cowser's similarly poor MLB line, I have two plus years of data with Hicks that suggest it isn't going to get much better.

Hopefully Cowser takes advantage of playing every day at Norfolk and gets back into a groove over the next couple weeks.

I don't understand bringing Hicks back at this point. I can't really see him making the playoff roster as he doesn't have a single elite skill at this point in his career. I would certainly rather have Kjerstad and McKenna on the playoff roster over Hicks. Can probably carry Ortiz as well, since you don't need close to a full 13-man pitching staff, given all the off days.

Hicks still plays a good centerfield.  Cowser looked very suspect there and looks more like a corner outfielder at this point and even that was not that impressive with some poor throws.  You could argue McKenna is better fit to help with defensive replacement then both though.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ThisIsBirdland said:

I'm really excited for Cowser's future (and most of our young guys) but I couldn't disagree more. Cowser's season long line of .115/.286/.148 is just not nearly good enough to run him out there for a team competing for the playoffs. Locking in on Hicks' recent 80 PA as opposed to his full 152 PA tenure in Baltimore (.252/.349/.435) seems a bit too selective as well. Hyde/Elias clearly value ML experience, especially when the rookie in question is struggling as much as Cowser has to this point. 

I agree with this. I think for the playoff push, Hicks is the better fit on this team right now. Cowswer needs to play everyday and I would expect him to make the 2024 team and play regularly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

Mateo is make of teflon.  

Did you not see him pinch running yesterday? I am no Mateo fan and think he should not be on the roster next season, but he needs to be on the playoff roster as a late inning defensive replacement and pinch runner.

  • Upvote 4
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MurphDogg said:

Did you not see him pinch running yesterday? I am no Mateo fan and think he should not be on the roster next season, but he needs to be on the playoff roster as a late inning defensive replacement and pinch runner.

The O's very own Dave Roberts.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

It will be interesting to see if Cowser gets an expanded roster callup in September. Stowers and Kjerstad have both been hitting well at AAA and may have a clearer bench role as a power pinch-hitter bat. 

Stowers is 2-30 in the last 2 weeks with 13 strikeouts.  He is very far from coming up.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...