Jump to content

Playoff Pitching Staff


DirtyBird

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

So many unknown things, but I am thinking a 12 man staff.

4 starters: Rodriguez, Bradish, Gibson and Flaherty (We seem to favor veterans)

8 in the pen: Bautista, Cano, Coloumbe, Perez, Means, Kremer, Irvin, Baumann

Webb’s got to be in there with how he’s pitched so far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dystopia said:

Webb’s got to be in there with how he’s pitched so far. 

Yeah, true. I'm not sure who they would drop. I have a feeling that each series will be different pitchers. Some of it will depend on matchups and also I think they may reward pitchers. I think Wells gets on it at some point as well. Maybe Kremer and Irvin are in one series but not another. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, dystopia said:

Webb’s got to be in there with how he’s pitched so far. 

And Hall is a possibility. Hate to cut anyone on that list, though. Hate to cut Fuji for that matter. 

I am worried about Coulombe. They were saying he would be back when first available but hasn't had a rehab appearance yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

So many unknown things, but I am thinking a 12 man staff.

4 starters: Rodriguez, Bradish, Gibson and Flaherty (We seem to favor veterans)

8 in the pen: Bautista, Cano, Coloumbe, Perez, Means, Kremer, Irvin, Baumann

 

12 minutes ago, dystopia said:

Webb’s got to be in there with how he’s pitched so far. 

 

9 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

Yeah, true. I'm not sure who they would drop. I have a feeling that each series will be different pitchers. Some of it will depend on matchups and also I think they may reward pitchers. I think Wells gets on it at some point as well. Maybe Kremer and Irvin are in one series but not another. 

And this still excludes Hall as a potential option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

Yeah, true. I'm not sure who they would drop. I have a feeling that each series will be different pitchers. Some of it will depend on matchups and also I think they may reward pitchers. I think Wells gets on it at some point as well. Maybe Kremer and Irvin are in one series but not another. 

As of now I don’t include Baumann and perhaps not Perez either. He’s one we’ll have to wait and see how September goes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DirtyBird said:

Interesting

I guess so.  We don't know what injuries will pop up between now and then.  Flaherty is a bit of a wild card for me.  We've got guys that are approaching their career highs in innings.  We don't know if/when Coloumbe will be back.  We don't know if/when Means will be back.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, baltimoriole said:

I wonder if any of the pitchers have contact incentives if they pitch X number of innings in a playoff game. Would Angelos wield to take them off the roster?

I don't think so.  Look, let's all agree that we would welcome an owner NOT named Angelos.  But if you think Angelos...with a team that could win the WS his father never could, would sacrifice that chance to save $50,000, then you don't understand how ego and wealth work.

Angelos is a lot of things.  But if the Orioles win it all, he will be front and center taking a victory lap that would make Cal's lap for 2131 look like a no show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I guess so.  We don't know what injuries will pop up between now and then.  Flaherty is a bit of a wild card for me.  We've got guys that are approaching their career highs in innings.  We don't know if/when Coloumbe will be back.  We don't know if/when Means will be back.  

We look forward to hearing back from you on this subject in a month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
    • I’m slightly (irrationally, I admit, there’s no factual basis for what I’m about to say) worried that Gunnar is going to view this as the “Gunnar vs. Bobby” show and press hard at the plate and in the field leading to bad at bats and unforced errors. 
    • Sounds like getting your heart broken by big league ballplayers is a personal problem. Learn and adjust accordingly. These guys usually aren’t trying to be role models and he played in an era where a lot of players were on the gas. Was I surprised? Yeah, a little bit.  No one likes to admit Jose Canseco was the most honest one up there that day and was telling the truth the entire time.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...