Jump to content

Westburg trade value


Es4M11

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, yark14 said:

He has a WAR of around 1 in less than 1/3 of a season worth of playing time....even with his best tool (power) not even taking off yet.  Westburg will be a 3-6 WAR player for the next decade...trading him would be foolish.

Depends what we could trade him for.   Anyway, I think 3-6 WAR for a decade is pretty bullish.   If you said he’d average 3 WAR for his remaining 6 years of team control, I’d probably buy it.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tntoriole said:

Maybe the surplus is what is used in a blockbuster trade for TOR controllable 

I sure hope so.  But so far Elias has been very conservative on trades and free agent signings...will be curious to see how he handles this offseason.  I love Westburg, but would be happy to see him as part of a trade for a controllable starting pitcher.  I would have preferred Elias traded more expendable prospects like Norby and Stowers, but I fear he held onto them a year too long and their trade value/prospect status has diminished in the past year.  And now with Mayo, Kjerstad, and Holliday all major league ready in 2024 Elias will have no choice but to address the position player logjam this offseason.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Otter said:

I sure hope so.  But so far Elias has been very conservative on trades and free agent signings...will be curious to see how he handles this offseason.  I love Westburg, but would be happy to see him as part of a trade for a controllable starting pitcher.  I would have preferred Elias traded more expendable prospects like Norby and Stowers, but I fear he held onto them a year too long and their trade value/prospect status has diminished in the past year.  And now with Mayo, Kjerstad, and Holliday all major league ready in 2024 Elias will have no choice but to address the position player logjam this offseason.

I would certainly consider trade Santander, Urias and Mateo, O’hearn  in any combination with prospects like Ortiz, Norby , Mayo to see what big or small return was possible this winter 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tntoriole said:

I would certainly consider trade Santander, Urias and Mateo, O’hearn  in any combination with prospects like Ortiz, Norby , Mayo to see what big or small return was possible this winter 

I agree that Norby, Ortiz and Mayo are more likely candidates to potentially get traded. With the logjam of prospects, I have to think Elias is going to trade some of the excess this off-season in return for pitching or an outside chance for an all star hitter. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the way the game is played these days, 4 guys who can all hit for 3 spots is what you want.  So Mayo, Henderson, Holliday, Westberg is ideal IMO.   Mayo can also mix at first.  Some of those guys could also get spot starts in the OF.  Ortiz probably becomes the true utility guy if he’s not traded.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is interesting… the hoarding/holding  of prospects certainly seems to be more Elias/Sig modus operandi.. very different than some.  I do like it !! More flexible in every way but highly dependent on scouting and drafting at high hit rates 
 

I think the key is will the team be sold when Angelos passes and will that happen in time for the next part ..cause that is the only way the other part of the Elias Houston model works .. ie signing the core guys early to big extensions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I agree that Norby, Ortiz and Mayo are more likely candidates to potentially get traded. With the logjam of prospects, I have to think Elias is going to trade some of the excess this off-season in return for pitching or an outside chance for an all star hitter. 

I really doubt Mayo is traded.  He’s 21 and would’ve been a top 3 draft pick this year if he went to college.  Ortiz is 25, Norby little younger at 23….but not 21.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

And of course if Adam Frazier is signed again, people’s heads will explode lol 😂 

I have thoroughly enjoyed Frazier's play for the Orioles--as I did Villar, Iglesias, Alberto, and Galvis before him--but I don't think his being around next year is something that anyone here needs to worry about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...