Jump to content

Bowden: Burnes potential suitors including Os


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

If Milwaukee wants to compete this year, they are going to need Burnes. I feel like to trade for Burnes, we're probably going to have to give them a deal that convinces them to start a quick rebuild

Can we get interesting and see something like Burnes, Devin Williams, and Yelich for Prospects and Salary Relief?

Yelich has 5 years left on his contract, and his 3.6 WAR would have been 4th best on the O's last year. I feel like we could give the Brewers a lighter Prospect load by taking that Yelich contract though. And if he can average 3-4 WAR for the next 3 seasons or so, I think its not a bad risk. He is 26 million a year; its a lot, but we have payroll room. If Yelich can give us quality ABs at RF/LF and DH, it could make us better as he is an OBP guy, his swing may play well in Camden Yards, and he does add 18 games across 3 Postseasons of experience too.

I think Kjerstad, Ortiz, Norby, Creed Williams, Povich, Stowers, Fabian and Baumler

For

1 Year of Burnes, 2 Years of Williams, and 5 Years of Yelich is fair

You could probably add a few more prospects if you want the Brewers to take some of Yelich's money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ScGO's said:

If Milwaukee wants to compete this year, they are going to need Burnes. I feel like to trade for Burnes, we're probably going to have to give them a deal that convinces them to start a quick rebuild

Can we get interesting and see something like Burnes, Devin Williams, and Yelich for Prospects and Salary Relief?

Yelich has 5 years left on his contract, and his 3.6 WAR would have been 4th best on the O's last year. I feel like we could give the Brewers a lighter Prospect load by taking that Yelich contract though. And if he can average 3-4 WAR for the next 3 seasons or so, I think its not a bad risk. He is 26 million a year; its a lot, but we have payroll room. If Yelich can give us quality ABs at RF/LF and DH, it could make us better as he is an OBP guy, his swing may play well in Camden Yards, and he does add 18 games across 3 Postseasons of experience too.

I think Kjerstad, Ortiz, Norby, Creed Williams, Povich, Stowers, Fabian and Baumler

For

1 Year of Burnes, 2 Years of Williams, and 5 Years of Yelich is fair

You could probably add a few more prospects if you want the Brewers to take some of Yelich's money

Hell to the No!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ScGO's said:

If Milwaukee wants to compete this year, they are going to need Burnes. I feel like to trade for Burnes, we're probably going to have to give them a deal that convinces them to start a quick rebuild

Can we get interesting and see something like Burnes, Devin Williams, and Yelich for Prospects and Salary Relief?

Yelich has 5 years left on his contract, and his 3.6 WAR would have been 4th best on the O's last year. I feel like we could give the Brewers a lighter Prospect load by taking that Yelich contract though. And if he can average 3-4 WAR for the next 3 seasons or so, I think its not a bad risk. He is 26 million a year; its a lot, but we have payroll room. If Yelich can give us quality ABs at RF/LF and DH, it could make us better as he is an OBP guy, his swing may play well in Camden Yards, and he does add 18 games across 3 Postseasons of experience too.

I think Kjerstad, Ortiz, Norby, Creed Williams, Povich, Stowers, Fabian and Baumler

For

1 Year of Burnes, 2 Years of Williams, and 5 Years of Yelich is fair

You could probably add a few more prospects if you want the Brewers to take some of Yelich's money

How many more prospects?  You are already trading 8 prospects in this deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

How many more prospects?  You are already trading 8 prospects in this deal.

But I feel like they are lesser prospects than what they would be asking for. More of a quantity over quality.

As far as Yelich, he fell off from his MVP seasons, but the past couple seasons have still been a better version of Markakis.

Again, I'd rather not trade for Yellich, but if you want Burnes, your going to have to convince Milwaukee to rebuild with a can't turn down trade like this. If Milwaukee wants to win this year, they will have to keep Burnes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/15/2023 at 11:15 PM, ScGO's said:

What are the Brewers looking to do next season? Rebuild or compete?

If they are trying to compete, they need offense. Perhaps the trade includes a Santander, Mountcastle, Hays, and/or Mullins? 

I also think the O's need Devin Williams. Again, what are the Brewers trying to do next year though?

If they are trying to rebuild, what prospects bag Burnes? Williams? Both?

Ortiz, Westburg, Cowser, Povich, Beavers, McDermott could get us both

I completely agree with trying to swing this trade. Makes the most sense for us, but I would try to include either Hayes or Mountcastle with a couple of prospects, as they are much easier to replace given our depth. This solves two big needs for us and we have the prospects they should covet.  I believe Williams has two years left. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/15/2023 at 11:40 AM, Tony-OH said:

You only give up that much if you think Burnes is the final piece of your World Series puzzle, and even then, I think you need him for at least two years for that return. 

Mayo is one of the three guys I would not move unless I was blown away by an offer. 

I'd trade Ortiz, McDermott, and say a guy like Haskin or even a wild card like Nunez for him though.

Prospects I like too much to be able to let go in a trade:

Jackson Holliday

Heston Kjerstad 

Colby Mayo

Jordan Westburg 

DL Hall / Grayson Rodriguez/ Gunnar Henderson etc

Beyond that, there's others that I like alot (like Basallo, Fabian, & Povich) but I could be persuaded to let them go for a player of Burnes caliber if the  deal is right. Realistically, we could/should probably include Westburg in that bunch, but I favor him too much to keep him off of my favorites list. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

Prospects I like too much to be able to let go in a trade:

Jackson Holliday

Heston Kjerstad 

Colby Mayo

Jordan Westburg 

DL Hall / Grayson Rodriguez/ Gunnar Henderson etc

Beyond that, there's others that I like alot (like Basallo, Fabian, & Povich) but I could be persuaded to let them go for a player of Burnes caliber if the  deal is right. Realistically, we could/should probably include Westburg in that bunch, but I favor him too much to keep him off of my favorites list. 

Basallo has really got to be on that list of prospects you like too much to be able to let go in a trade. Theres' no doubt who you trade between him and Westburg...or him and Kjerstad or Hall even, and I'm a huge fan of both of those. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Flash- bd said:

Basallo has really got to be on that list of prospects you like too much to be able to let go in a trade. Theres' no doubt who you trade between him and Westburg...or him and Kjerstad or Hall even, and I'm a huge fan of both of those. 

Agreed..Basallo is a no brainer must keep over some of those names.

I just don’t see any player available that should even remotely make us think about trading our top 3 prospects.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I can't imagine they would do Burnes and Williams for less than either Holliday or Mayo and Basallo. Someone will offer a Mayo level player at least for Burnes and probably close to that for two years of Williams.

I doubt they get a top 20ish prospect for 1 year of Burnes. I greatly question someone doing it for Williams but given the emphasis on bullpens, maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I doubt they get a top 20ish prospect for 1 year of Burnes. I greatly question someone doing it for Williams but given the emphasis on bullpens, maybe.

The Reds got a top 20 guy plus a top 100 for 1+ of Castillo. If the Brewers are on the fence about rebuild, they may prefer to wait til the trade deadline if they can't get an overpay now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

The Reds got a top 20 guy plus a top 100 for 1+ of Castillo. If the Brewers are on the fence about rebuild, they may prefer to wait til the trade deadline if they can't get an overpay now. 

Right, 1+ and it was at the deadline, which is completely different to the offseason.

Burnes has also seen his numbers decline the last few years.

Look at the consensus top 20 or so guys..who is getting traded?

Will the Red Sox be really desperate and deal Mayer? I don’t disagree that it’s possible they are really dumb.

Who else? Most guys in the top 20 are on rebuilding teams or guys that just aren’t getting traded for 1 year rental. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I hadn't read that, but it seems we are thinking similar things. 😃  
    • So true, I also love that surprisingly often you see a play that you've never seen before.
    • Exactly right. In the playoffs this would be all you need starting wise, if the bullpen gets fixed.
    • His sophomore year was a disaster, had nagging injuries and didnt pitch well at all. When the season was over Liberty sent him to a training program in Utah. I will not get into why he didn't play his junior season but it's nothing to worry about. We took care or him in HS and travel never threw to many innings.
    • If there is a way to get him work in the minors, then yes....perhaps a "mental health" injury stint.
    • It's been a couple months, let's check in on where things sit. Tony's ranking in parentheses: Locks: 1. Coby Mayo (3) - Stud. He won't need to wait till the winter. 2. Cade Povich (5) - Bad start last night but 3.85 xFIP in AAA this year, he's looked really good. 3. Chayce McDermott (8): 14.36 K/9 in Norfolk but 5.74 BB/9 too.  4. Connor Norby (10): .386 wOBA, .309 xwOBA this year - I'm not a fan but he still gets added More Likely Than Not: 5. Brandon Young (26): The move to Norfolk proves they think he's for real. He has the best xFIP in the org (2.17) He hasn't thrown 5 innings in an outing yet though. They're still being cautious with him. 6. Kade Strowd (20): 2.88 xFIP and got bumped to Norfolk. He has a real shot to get added. He could be bullpen depth this year even. Other Names to Watch: Trey McGough - LHP, got bumped to Norfolk. 3.78 xFIP there so far. Luis Gonzalez - 32 year old Mexican league find like Suarez, Cesar Valdez, Miguel Gonzalez, but he'll get a cup of coffee this year the way he's pitching. 3.43 xFIP in 22 IP inNorfolk. Maverick Handley - .246/.357/.396 in Norfolk and reportedly has a strong arm. Do they trade for Blake Hunt if they like Handley to replace McCann next year?  Nick Richmond - Strong numbers in Bowie to start the year, 3.34 xFIP Eligible, but Not Playing Well Enough for Consideration: Hudson Haskin, Billy Cook, Justin Armbreuster, Keagan Gillies, John Rhodes, Carter Baumler, Kyle Brnovich, Moises Chace, Wandisson Charles, Carlos Tavera
    • Elias has so many factors to contemplate in consideration of trade acquisitions.  Among them is how he foresees the 2025 roster (and beyond) and whether trading a player or prospect away will affect that roster.  Luzardo would fit in very well, as we'd have him this year and two more, helping to offset the loss of Burnes after this season. Is it potentially worth losing six years of control of multiple prospects?  It was worth losing Ortiz and Hall and all their years of control for one season of Burnes.  Such considerations make for an interesting aspect of determining who to target and knowing what your max offer would be.  Being on the same page with the other team's GM may still find you on the outside looking in if another team ups their offer enough to outbid you. I'd be in heaven to be able to be with Elias as he has these conversations and to see how he views things. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...