Jump to content

Mewleski: The infield depth seems to be leading to one conclusion – a trade is coming.


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

Quote

The infield depth seems to be leading to one conclusion – a trade is coming. Because it has not so far doesn’t mean it won’t. But the Orioles don’t have to make a trade, which puts them in good bargaining position. Mike Elias stated during the Winter Meetings that they can trade with just about any club in the majors in terms of their strong minor league depth and strong prospects list.

Teams often look to make trades from their depth – trade that of which you have a surplus.

The O’s prospects lists with infielders and outfielders shows plenty of depth. Less so probably among the arms.

To me, considering the depth of talent here, a deal seems likely, almost inevitable


I agree but you have to wonder when Elias is going to pull the trigger.

 

 

https://www.masnsports.com/blog/is-a-trade-inevitable-for-the-orioles

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:


I agree but you have to wonder when Elias is going to pull the trigger.

 

 

https://www.masnsports.com/blog/is-a-trade-inevitable-for-the-orioles

As Mewleski said, Elias doesn't need to do anything... yet.  Naturally when there is a logjam of prospects pushing their way up for playing time, it's a great "problem" to have.  Injuries may occur at a position or two, or in some cases prospects will just be better options to take over.  Either way, at some point, a trade or three seems inevitable.  If not this Winter, then by the deadline I'd think.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Change it to "The infield depth seems to be leading to one conclusion – a trade should be coming," and I'm fully on board.

Elias has been extremely cautious and risk-averse when it comes to using dollars or talented players to bring in talent with established major league value. That trait (along with ownership's stinginess and profit-hoarding) has made him very reluctant to trade a guy who, while not likely to get many ABs with the Orioles (and, in some cases, may not even get a roster spot for another year), might blossom into an All Star-level player if traded.

That speculation is strengthened by the fact that the centerpiece of the trade likely would be for a starter or starters who could be shelved due to injury at any time. You can throw in the fact that Elias has never made a "big trade" in which he parts with high-level (or potentially high-level) talent, or a big-dollar free-agent signing, and surely doesn't want to sully the strong reputation he's built by making his first big trade or signing one that turns out badly: any of the IFs he would trade could be a valuable, Adam Jones-caliber major leaguer for a long time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think most of us have been saying this for months. It just seems to drag on FOREVER. We have too many infielders and outfielders and need a good, young starting pitcher. I keep waiting on Elias to make it happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Greg Pappas said:

As Mewleski said, Elias doesn't need to do anything... yet.  Naturally when there is a logjam of prospects pushing their way up for playing time, it's a great "problem" to have.  Injuries may occur at a position or two, or in some cases prospects will just be better options to take over.  Either way, at some point, a trade or three seems inevitable.  If not this Winter, then by the deadline I'd think.

 

It's only a great problem to have if you take advantage of the situation to improve the team as a whole. Otherwise it's a huge missed opportunity. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jagwar said:

Unfortunately, I think other teams want pitching, which is not a part of the O's organizational depth. 

I read that the Marlin or Mariners (don’t remember which)have a middle infielder after a loss. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Dipoto needs a COF and a productive DH. We could certainly dangle Mountcastle, O’Hearn , Hays, and or Santander. Dipoto is a dealer and doesn’t have to be a clear winner to make a deal.

What about Mountcastle, and Cowser to start a deal or Santander and Irvin to start a deal or Hays and Ortiz? Obviously we’d need to add something else but should be enough pieces to find a deal.

 

https://www.mlb.com/news/mariners-remaining-offseason-needs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, spiritof66 said:

Change it to "The infield depth seems to be leading to one conclusion – a trade should be coming," and I'm fully on board.

Elias has been extremely cautious and risk-averse when it comes to using dollars or talented players to bring in talent with established major league value. That trait (along with ownership's stinginess and profit-hoarding) has made him very reluctant to trade a guy who, while not likely to get many ABs with the Orioles (and, in some cases, may not even get a roster spot for another year), might blossom into an All Star-level player if traded.

That speculation is strengthened by the fact that the centerpiece of the trade likely would be for a starter or starters who could be shelved due to injury at any time. You can throw in the fact that Elias has never made a "big trade" in which he parts with high-level (or potentially high-level) talent, or a big-dollar free-agent signing, and surely doesn't want to sully the strong reputation he's built by making his first big trade or signing one that turns out badly: any of the IFs he would trade could be a valuable, Adam Jones-caliber major leaguer for a long time.

 

Or the IF prospects could turn out to be Ryan Flaherty .. risks always exist but Elias results are only thing that matters 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • This seems to be happening quite frequently around the league. Which makes me rethink the idea of giving players early extensions in their young careers. Baseball is a difficult game and no season in a player's career is exactly like another.  Baseball is a volatile game. There's so many things that can happen to a player's habits and mechanics that can change his results in the game. (Speaking of no season being the same, how many batting stances did we see Cal Ripken Jr go through over the course of his career? ALOT.)
    • No. And having said that, Basallo is not known for his defense as a catcher either. He's known as a power hitter. Adley is by far the better catcher. Basallo has been compared to Yordan Alvarez of the Astros. Great hitter. He's in the lineup for his bat and you just hope he can play adequate defense. Any expectations of him usurping Rutschman as an every day catcher is wishful thinking. He could still develop as a catcher because he's young, in which case he could become something like the Royals' Salvador Perez. But I would in no circumstances trade Basallof for Chrochet.
    • If it turns out that Bradish is done for the season or has to spend extended time on IL,  might the O's make the move to sign Trevor Bauer?  He's pitching very well in the Mexican League.  Wouldn't surprise me to see some team sign him between now and the trade deadline.  Just askin...    
    • I wouldn't put it past the O's offense to carry them in a similar way. But I wouldn't want to count on it, either.  (For reference on the difference, looks like Texas scored 5.71 runs/game during the postseason last year. The O's are at 5.07 runs/game this season.)
    • Totally 💯 agree with you . The problem is agents like Boras are asking 8-10 years deals with pitchers opt-outs sprinkling in them .  
    • I'm hoping the PRP injection wasn't just buying Bradish a few months only delaying the inevitable Tommy John surgery. If Bradish ends up going under the knife there's a decent chance we won't see him again until 2026. Bradish was throwing really hard tonight so I'm hoping it's just some soreness from overexerting himself and he'll be fine with a little time off. This isn't encouraging and Elias is going to be busy working the phones for pitching help the next 45 days.
    • Thats why its nuts to sign a pitcher for 8-10 years...they break, all of them, eventually...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...