Jump to content

Mateo Noise


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

Unless I’m not understanding correctly, Frobby’s post on arbitration projections indicates that Mateo has already been tendered a contract ($2.7M). Doesn’t seem like Elias is ready to move on from him yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Babkins said:

Unless I’m not understanding correctly, Frobby’s post on arbitration projections indicates that Mateo has already been tendered a contract ($2.7M). Doesn’t seem like Elias is ready to move on from him yet. 

Or at least thinks he can get something (anything) for him instead of a non tender and letting him go for nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Mateo's value at this point is that he can play multiple positions, most importantly shortstop, has elite speed, and can occasionally get into a ball. I hold out no hope that he will ever be a consistent hitter, but I do think he's a decent utility guy. 

 

If I believed that's how they'd use him,  as a utility guy/pinch runner, then I wouldn't mind so much him being on the roster. But Hyde had shown he's going to give the Mateos on the roster WAY too many starts and at bats for me to want him around.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Or at least thinks he can get something (anything) for him instead of a non tender and letting him go for nothing.

He probably wants the flexibility to keep or trade him.  I doubt he’s irrevocably committed to either course. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

If I believed that's how they'd use him,  as a utility guy/pinch runner, then I wouldn't mind so much him being on the roster. But Hyde had shown he's going to give the Mateos on the roster WAY too many starts and at bats for me to want him around.   

Last year, Mateo made 66 starts in the first 83 games.  In the final 79 games, he started 31 times.  So, Hyde did make a big adjustment.  Now, if you’re thinking that even starting 40% of the time is too much, I guess there’s reason for some concern.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Mateo's value at this point is that he can play multiple positions, most importantly shortstop, has elite speed, and can occasionally get into a ball. I hold out no hope that he will ever be a consistent hitter, but I do think he's a decent utility guy. 

 

If he continues to get reps in CF and becomes more comfortable with the position, then he's an ideal utility man, pinch runner, defensive replacement for this team. Can probably meet be on from McKenna then

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Mateo's value at this point is that he can play multiple positions, most importantly shortstop, has elite speed, and can occasionally get into a ball. I hold out no hope that he will ever be a consistent hitter, but I do think he's a decent utility guy. 

 

This is what I expected to see of him toward the end of the season, especially as a pinch runner, but that didn't happen.  Not many opportunities against the Rangers, sadly, but he wasn't used much, if at all for his speed.  Occasionally, sure, but not consistently.

17 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

If I believed that's how they'd use him,  as a utility guy/pinch runner, then I wouldn't mind so much him being on the roster. But Hyde had shown he's going to give the Mateos on the roster WAY too many starts and at bats for me to want him around.   

This is where I am too.  I think there's potential, but his history shows it's a very shaky bet.  So if there's a team that wants to take that bet at a rate that scores us a decent reliever, I think I'm ready to take that.  I'd prefer keeping Urias' glove and more reliable bat.  I can do without the speed part for more reliablitiy in the field and at the plate.  Urias can spell every IF position except 1B.  It's those positions where there's more need for evaluation of farm guys. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Last year, Mateo made 66 starts in the first 83 games.  In the final 79 games, he started 31 times.  So, Hyde did make a big adjustment.  Now, if you’re thinking that even starting 40% of the time is too much, I guess there’s reason for some concern.   

Yes,  starting 40% of the time is still way to much.   I'm not sure I even want him starting 20% of the time.   2 reasons.   First, his bat doesn't justify that many at bats.  And second his real value is to be plugged into the basepaths at key moments.  If he's already in the lineup that option is removed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

Yes,  starting 40% of the time is still way to much.   I'm not sure I even want him starting 20% of the time.   2 reasons.   First, his bat doesn't justify that many at bats.  And second his real value is to be plugged into the basepaths at key moments.  If he's already in the lineup that option is removed.  

The problem is if Mateo is on the team I think Hyde is going to play him more than 20% of the time. So while he still might be a valuable utility player cutting or trading him seems like it would be a greater good type of move to me. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...