Jump to content

Orioles 2024 Best defensive combination


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, RVAOsFan said:

Great question to a great thread.  This was the first question that popped into my head when I looked at the lineup.  If the answer is they are very close it kind of makes me wonder if Westburg is the one we should be including in trade proposals.  Don't get me wrong I really liked what I saw from Westburg last year, but are we not putting enough value into Ortiz defense? So many options with the infield depth, good problem to have. 

I think Westburg is the guy (we are willing to trade) that will bring back a big fish.  Would be very painful.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RVAOsFan said:

@Tony-OH who do you think has more trade value Westburg or Ortiz? Who would you rather keep, who would you rather trade?

That's a good question. Ortiz is the better defender by far, even though Westburg was solid average at 2B and 3B last year, I'd take him defensively at either and Ortiz is the best defensive SS in the org. Now, Westburg has the more explosive bat and has the better plate discipline. He has more power for sure and hits less ground balls.

If the Orioles believe Holliday will be able to handle SS defensively at the major league level (they have more data than I do) then there is less risk in trading him. If they think Holliday will have to move to 2B or 3B, then I think they'd prefer to move Westburg vs Ortiz. 

To me it's very close but because of Ortiz's ability to play a plus SS and plus, plus 2B, I'd probably prefer to keep him over Westburg.

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Tony-OH it's not explicitly stated in the OP, but I assume you're talking about best defensive lineup, among guys we want in the lineup? 

If it was just purely best glove, would McKenna (or Hilliard I guess) be above Hays/Cowser?

And how do you think Ortiz/Gunnar compare to Mateo defensively at SS? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

@Tony-OH it's not explicitly stated in the OP, but I assume you're talking about best defensive lineup, among guys we want in the lineup? 

If it was just purely best glove, would McKenna (or Hilliard I guess) be above Hays/Cowser?

And how do you think Ortiz/Gunnar compare to Mateo defensively at SS? 

No, I stated it was based on guys on the 40-man and defense only. I would not want McKenna over Hays in LF or Cowser in RF. McKenna is ok defensively, but not a stud out there. And we'll always have that one handed drop. 

Ortiz is better defensively than both Mateo and Henderson.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

That's a good question. Ortiz is the better defender by far, even though Westburg was solid average at 2B and 3B last year, I'd take him defensively at either and Ortiz is the best defensive SS in the org. Now, Westburg has the more explosive bat and has the better plate discipline. He has more power for sure and hits less ground balls.

If the Orioles believe Holliday will be able to handle SS defensively at the major league level (they have more data than I do) then there is less risk in trading him. If they think Holliday will have to move to 2B or 3B, then I think they'd prefer to move Westburg vs Ortiz. 

To me it's very close but because of Ortiz's ability to play a plus SS and plus, plus 2B, I'd probably prefer to keep him over Westburg.

Interesting, I appreciate you taking the time to respond.  Like I said, I really liked what I saw from Westburg last year but the thought of trading away a plus defender at a premium position like SS sure does sting.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

No, I stated it was based on guys on the 40-man and defense only. I would not want McKenna over Hays in LF or Cowser in RF. McKenna is ok defensively, but not a stud out there. And we'll always have that one handed drop. 

Ortiz is better defensively than both Mateo and Henderson.

Ah, I saw the bat comment, but the lack of Mateo/McKenna made me wonder if you meant, bat strength isn't being considered among guys who you might want starting (the O'Hearn, Kjerstad type). Reading between the lines too much. 

That's encouraging about Ortiz and Cowser that they would be ahead of Mateo and McKenna on defense alone. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this thread.  I have Gunnar over Ortiz as the better defensive SS. I have Urias over Ortiz at 3B. Ortiz would only be the best defender at 2B. That is not taking anything away from Ortiz. I like Ortiz. I think he can be Urias+. 

I know this is an all defense discussion, but Mayo is now slouch. He’s big and has a cannon. At 3B and 30HR power, that’s nothing to sneeze at. We can sacrifice a little range. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

Ah, I saw the bat comment, but the lack of Mateo/McKenna made me wonder if you meant, bat strength isn't being considered among guys who you might want starting (the O'Hearn, Kjerstad type). Reading between the lines too much. 

That's encouraging about Ortiz and Cowser that they would be ahead of Mateo and McKenna on defense alone. 

Defensively, both McKenna and Mateo are a bit over rated around here, at least in comparisons to who they replace.  Mateo IS a good SS, but Henderson and Ortiz are both better.  Another reason I don't see a ton of logic with carrying Mateo on the roster over Ortiz.  But I digress.  🙂  McKenna is not a butcher in the outfield, his stupid mistakes notwithstanding, but nor is he a great defender either.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

We've been discussing in multiple threads who fits where best defensively. So without taking the bats into consideration, and only going off the current 40-man roster, this is the best defensive team the Orioles can put on the field to start 2024. Just a note, a player can only be in one position so in the case of Joey Ortiz where he would be the best shortstop and second baseman, he can only be one.

1B: Ryan Mountcastle 
2B: Jordan Westburg
SS: Joey Ortiz
3B: Gunnar Henderson
C : Adley Rutschman
LF: Austin Hays
CF: Cedric Mullins
RF: Colton Cowser

Now there is going to be some argument that Gunnar Henderson is the best defensive shortstop, and by arm strength alone, they would be right, but I've seen enough quickness, smoothness and consistency from Joey Ortiz that he would be preference at SS, especially since Henderson is by and far the best defensive 3B.


 

 

From what I saw last year, Santander is a better RF than Cowser at the present moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I like this thread.  I have Gunnar over Ortiz as the better defensive SS. I have Urias over Ortiz at 3B. Ortiz would only be the best defender at 2B. That is not taking anything away from Ortiz. I like Ortiz. I think he can be Urias+. 

I know this is an all defense discussion, but Mayo is now slouch. He’s big and has a cannon. At 3B and 30HR power, that’s nothing to sneeze at. We can sacrifice a little range. 

You are really underrating Ortiz.  He's the best defensive SS in the organization, and likely one of the top 3B, and quite better than Urias, gold glove or not.  I'd love to see us give both Urias and Mateo the boot and give their at bats to Ortiz, and when/if Holiday is up put Ortiz in the super sub position, playing whenever Henderson/Holiday/Westburg needs a rest.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I like this thread.  I have Gunnar over Ortiz as the better defensive SS. I have Urias over Ortiz at 3B. Ortiz would only be the best defender at 2B. That is not taking anything away from Ortiz. I like Ortiz. I think he can be Urias+. 

I know this is an all defense discussion, but Mayo is now slouch. He’s big and has a cannon. At 3B and 30HR power, that’s nothing to sneeze at. We can sacrifice a little range. 

Urias was -10 OAA and -7 FRV at 3B last year. He has a well below average arm for the left side of the infield. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If all I cared about was defense, I might put Mateo at SS and move Ortiz to 2B.  Mateo was the Fielding Bible winner in 2022, deservedly so, and though he clearly slipped last year, I feel that was due to not playing every day, not because he lost any ability.  And even if Gunnar or Ortiz might be a slightly better SS as of 2024, this alignment gets all three on the field at the same time at positions where they can be plus or plus plus.  

By the way, as evidence of my theory on Mateo, through 72 games he was +6 Rdrs and +4.6 UZR.   The rest of the season, when he started playing more sporadically, he was -4 Rdrs and -1.1 UZR.

Needless to say, this is all academic, since Mateo’s offense is so bad and unreliable.  But the exercise was solely about defense.  
 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Santander may have improved last year from his previous two years, but he was still -1 OOA and -3 FRV. 

I know everyone wants to remember a few plays by Cowser in the outfield and want to say he's a bad defender, but I've seen him a ton in the minors and he's going to be a very good corner outfielder and adequate CF fill in.

Santander is physically limited out there, especially in regards to speed, but he takes good routes, catches everything, and has a solid arm.

Cowser is obviously a lot more tooled up, but I was disappointed in his routes and his throwing arm- not the strength, that was better than I thought tbh, but his mechanics in receiving and releasing the ball led to several bad/inaccurate throws.

I know you've probably seen him more than any of us on this board, and I respect your opinion.  I have little doubt in the long run it will turn out to be correct.  But, as of last year, I felt more comfortable with Santander in RF than Cowser, and I'd like to see improvement from Cowser before I changed my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...