Jump to content

Could Mike Baumann be pitching his way into high leverage situations?


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

We know the Orioles need the 3rd high leverage guy behind Kimbrel and Cano, but could they already have him. Mike Baumann is throwing harder than last year, and showing swing and miss stuff this spring. Here's his Spring tracker info:

image.thumb.png.5ea027f6820082961aafec6920170c0c.png

Tate will get some looks, but I don't trust Tate late in games even prior to his injury, so I really think Baumann could start getting those looks. The only thing is whether the Orioles like to stretch him out and let him be more of a 2-3 inning guy, which will limit the amount games he can be used in versus using him more frequently in high leverage situations. 

Either way, Baumann is looking very good this spring and with no options, he's an absolute lock for the pen.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Tony-OH changed the title to Could Mike Baumann be pitching his way into high leverage situations?

Just making the team would be a good accomplishment for him. He's got a track record so we've got a pretty good idea of his baseline as well as his ceiling. I don't think he's passing Cano/Kimbrel/Coulombe/Perez/Wells (if he's in the pen) any time soon, but you never know with reliever volatility. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, waroriole said:

You don’t trust Tate, but you trust Baumann? I don’t really see Mike as a MLB pitcher. More of a AAAA guy. 

Baumann has better "stuff".   I think Tate is ok, but I would not want him in high-leverage situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baumann, Webb, Tate, and McDermott, all look like they will be used in that role this season and we might just ride the hot hand. Baumann tired out last year so a fresh Baumann will get the first opportunity to the the #3/#4 guy. Ultimately, I think McDermott wins it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

Baumann has better "stuff".   I think Tate is ok, but I would not want him in high-leverage situations.

Tate was throwing 91-92 when I saw him on Sunday.   I believe he was higher in earlier outings, but that made me nervous.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Tate was throwing 91-92 when I saw him on Sunday.   I believe he was higher in earlier outings, but that made me nervous.  

I could be wrong, but I feel like even in Tate's good season he had a lot of velocity fluctuation. One outing he'd be 91 and the next he'd pump 96. Again, I could be misremembering that, I'm not sure. Chris Tillman used to do the same thing and there was no rhyme or reason to it. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at the log of Baumann’s velo on Fangraphs, last year his velo peaked early and really wore down as the year went on. He was used a lot and it was his first year as a RP, so not surprising. Early returns are that the off-season did him a lot of good. He’s certainly got a big arm and we need somebody to step up, hope he’s able to do it. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

He looked excellent yesterday.

Yeah, but still inconsistent with his fastball command.  I think he has a chance and Hyde seems to single him out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been multiple quotes from Hyde this spring about how impressed he's been w/ Baumann.  Absent a complete meltdown or physical issue these next couple weeks, he's going to pitch significant leverage innings to start the season, I have no doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big Mike is one of my favs so I'm biased. He had an excellent year last year until he ran out of gas. Will he do better in high leverage situations? The stuff so far says an emphatic yes. The only way to know is to give him the ball.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...