Jump to content

Cade Povich 2024


emmett16

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, Frobby said:

But the "Billy Boxscore" stuff was irritating, and he should have stopped when you told him to.   

I can't be the only one who though Billy Boxscore was message board gold, was I? Don't get me wrong. He was over the top. He basically posted like an angry boomer who got onto the internets for the first time. I'm happy that Tony put an end to it (even though I did find a couple of his posts very interesting).

But Billy Boxscore, when referring to SG, was just hilarious to me.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

The IL is walking 4.7 per nine, which is kind of astronomical. Across the minors walks are over 4.0 per nine everywhere except the AA Southern League. That was the case last year, too. Was a little lower in '22. But if you go back to '19 everyone (except a couple rookie leagues) were under 4.0. Is this because of the auto ball/strike system? I think I haven't been paying close enough attention to know.

For comparison, the Majors have been over 4.0 walks per nine just twice and just barely, in 1949-50. And in the last 60-70 years have only been over 3.5 a very small handful of times.

So the International League sees more walks this year than any year in MLB history, and it's not close. They're walking 44% more batters than the Majors are in '24. It would be nice if some aspiring analyst went and looked to see if AAA pitchers walk rates fall upon promotion to the majors, and vice versa.

Keep in mind that the International League uses robo-umps.   Major league umps call 12% of true balls as strikes, but only 3% of true strikes as balls (per Ump Scorecard).   So, IL pitchers are probably getting a much stingier strike zone than they see anywhere else.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Keep in mind that the International League uses robo-umps.   Major league umps call 12% of true balls as strikes, but only 3% of true strikes as balls (per Ump Scorecard).   So, IL pitchers are probably getting a much stingier strike zone than they see anywhere else.

 

Yea, that's my assumption. But this is probably also why there's talk of tweaking the real book strike zone (or how the robo-umps call it) because the real strike zone means there's going to be WAAAAY more walks than at any point in major league history. My guess is that the IL strike zone ported to MLB would result in runs jumping up to around 5 per game. And probably a non-linear effect where some pitchers who currently have borderline command quickly exit the league.

Imagine Felix Bautista never getting what's now a close call on a ball/strike. 😧

Edited by DrungoHazewood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Yea, that's my assumption. But this is probably also why there's talk of tweaking the real book strike zone (or how the robo-umps call it) because the real strike zone means there's going to be WAAAAY more walks than at any point in major league history. My guess is that the IL strike zone ported to MLB would result in runs jumping up to around 5 per game. And probably a non-linear effect where some pitchers who currently have borderline command quickly exit the league.

Imagine Felix Bautista never getting what's now a close call on a ball/strike. 😧

My view is, the game needs more offense, and if it can be generated by enforcing a true strike zone, I'm for it.  I think major league pitchers will adjust and the increase in walks will be significant but not as big as would occur if they just ocntinued throwing balls in the same spots where they were previously getting incorrect calls.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, Frobby said:

My view is, the game needs more offense, and if it can be generated by enforcing a true strike zone, I'm for it.  I think major league pitchers will adjust and the increase in walks will be significant but not as big as would occur if they just ocntinued throwing balls in the same spots where they were previously getting incorrect calls.

That's an interesting point of view, that baseball needs more offense. The all-time MLB average runs/game is about 4.7, but that includes a bunch of very early seasons with 6, 8, 10+ runs/game. Since 1900 (and also since WWII) the average is about 4.4 runs/game.

So far this year the Majors are averaging 4.34, and as the weather warms up it will almost certainly nudge up towards 4.5 or 4.6. Since 2016 every season has been at or above the post-1900 averages for runs scored per game.

Even at the height of the PED era runs were only over 5.00 three times, and never more than the 5.14 of 2000. I think that increasing walks to 2024 IL levels would put the majors right around the 2000 runs scored level, if not a bit more.

Edited by DrungoHazewood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Frobby said:

WTF is the “formulated consensus?”  Sounds like nonsense.  

Last years I posted about the PARS list. StS is another prospect ranking system that they use lots of different advanced stats.

These 2 just joined together and did the Avengers thing and came up with a combined list using their criteria.

Its probably a lot more valid than subjective rankings done because of draft status and “what you think”.

That said, it’s also based off of a SSS of stats, so there is only so much to take from it.

I do know both of these systems liked Povich last year too.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some Szymborski context hype for Povich being the best in the Internatlonal League in ERA by a lot.      Ibid K-bb to any inclined to weigh that heavily.

 Dan Szymborski: I think some of the perception is that people dont’ necessarily get just how massive the difference in offense between AAA and MLB is right

 Dan Szymborski: MLB is at 4.3 R/G now. International League is 5.2 and Pacific Coast at 5.8

 Dan Szymborski: Basically a AAA pitcher’s translation at the moment is their actual AAA numbers

 Dan Szymborski: while the difference in translation for AAA hitter and MLB hitter is more akin to the typical relationship between AA and MLB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Some Szymborski context hype for Povich being the best in the Internatlonal League in ERA by a lot.      Ibid K-bb to any inclined to weigh that heavily.

 Dan Szymborski: I think some of the perception is that people dont’ necessarily get just how massive the difference in offense between AAA and MLB is right

 Dan Szymborski: MLB is at 4.3 R/G now. International League is 5.2 and Pacific Coast at 5.8

 Dan Szymborski: Basically a AAA pitcher’s translation at the moment is their actual AAA numbers

 Dan Szymborski: while the difference in translation for AAA hitter and MLB hitter is more akin to the typical relationship between AA and MLB

Someone needs to tell Jack Leiter about the even money exchange for pitchers between AAA and MLB.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Someone needs to tell Jack Leiter about the even money exchange for pitchers between AAA and MLB.

Haha, I do think there is some inflated offensive numbers in AAA. I always assumed it was bad defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/10/2024 at 11:27 AM, LookinUp said:

I can't be the only one who though Billy Boxscore was message board gold, was I? Don't get me wrong. He was over the top. He basically posted like an angry boomer who got onto the internets for the first time. I'm happy that Tony put an end to it (even though I did find a couple of his posts very interesting).

But Billy Boxscore, when referring to SG, was just hilarious to me.

I'm loving the Billy Boxscore name.  Can we have a vote about a name change for SG to Billy Boxscore? 😝

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I'm loving the Billy Boxscore name.  Can we have a vote about a name change for SG to Billy Boxscore? 😝

I had some other names in mind but I’m down with Billy Boxscore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Glad one poseur AL team is out.  I hope CLE wins and knocks the other one out tomorrow. 
    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...