Jump to content

630 start time plus pitch clock


Recommended Posts

I live in California...weekday games start at 3:30...tonights game was over at about 6:05 pm...its just wonderful to have my entire evening to wind down from thr angst of a close game...and when we win, like tonight...I have the entire evening to savour it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

You don't enjoy every Yankees hitter stepping out of the batters box after each pitch and adjusting their cup.

Count me as a fan of the pitch clock.

Soto still finds time to touch himself in between pitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Frobby said:

If you are disciplined, you can avoid learning the result and just watch the game unfold without knowing what will happen, and skip all the commercials. 

I'm kind of with Moose on this one. There's just something more appealing about knowing what you're watching is happening in real time, and that you can talk about it with other baseball/Orioles fans while it's happening.

I've done the recording option several times before, and the game just loses some of it's luster even if I don't know who won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Frobby said:

If you are disciplined, you can avoid learning the result and just watch the game unfold without knowing what will happen, and skip all the commercials. 

This is my daily routine, after dinner, baths, putting the kids to bed, and finally sitting down around 9pm or so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

These 2 changes, one by MLB and one by the Os are absolute game changers.

In the past, we would be in like the 4th inning vs the Yankees right now..en route to another 3.5+ hour game.

The game is just so much better when it’s played at a better rhythm and starting it earlier and getting the games over with earlier is fantastic, especially during the week

 

I still am somewhat in disbelief that Major League Baseball saw an obvious problem, recognized this as a problem, stopped the nonsense of trying to convince everyone that a bug was actually a feature, and then implemented a straightforward and effective solution.  For my entire life MLB had a terrible habit of trying to sell problems as benefits, often to placate what they saw as traditionalists and older fans who wouldn't like any changes to the game at all.

With game times they basically said enough, we're implementing a pitch clock, if you don't like it, sorry. And the results have been wonderful. A baseball game now typically ends before a normal, working (or school-attending) person's bedtime. A baseball game isn't much different in length than a basketball or hockey game or soccer match. It's the length it was, more-or-less, for most of history. Baseball is a normal sport again, not a marathon where half the audience falls asleep in the 7th inning, or just gives up because they have to go to work in six hours.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% completely agreed!  

I can usually start watching the game around dinner time.  We do have a strict no TV rule with the kids during dinner time, however, the Oriole games are the only exception.  It's not really watching, more like listening.  We'll usually turn our heads when we hear KB getting excited.

By the time everything is cleaned up and the kids ready for bed - the game is usually in the 3rd frame (7/8/9) innings.

Well done MLB and Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

The pitch clock is great. Unfortunately MLB pitchers don't see it the same way. Both the players union and Burnes basically blamed the pitch clock for this year's injuries, even though there's no scientific study to conclude that for sure.

When you say "no scientific study to conclude that for sure" I think the reality is closer to "there's really no evidence that the pitch clock is anything but a minor contributing factor." I think it's quite obvious that the root cause of pitching injuries is almost every pitcher trying to throw almost every pitch at 110% of their reasonable capacity. Sure, wildly over-straining your arm might be slightly more dangerous if you do it a bit more quickly, but that doesn't change the fact that the wildly over-straining part is the overwhelming cause. It's like saying you broke your hand punching the brick wall, but saying the real problem was how quickly you repeated the punching.

Of course that didn't stop people like Tony Clark from issuing knee-jerk, reactionary, baseless statements blaming the pitch clock. He's paid to look out for his current members, and only slightly cares that the product on the field is immensely more enjoyable with a clock.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Rbiggs2525 said:

It’s makes going to weekday games plausible too. I can normally get home 10-10:30.

I agree, except 11:30pm for me.

Been to 3 so far and wife and I  enjoy the pace of the game

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I still am somewhat in disbelief that Major League Baseball saw an obvious problem, recognized this as a problem, stopped the nonsense of trying to convince everyone that a bug was actually a feature, and then implemented a straightforward and effective solution.  For my entire life MLB had a terrible habit of trying to sell problems as benefits, often to placate what they saw as traditionalists and older fans who wouldn't like any changes to the game at all.

With game times they basically said enough, we're implementing a pitch clock, if you don't like it, sorry. And the results have been wonderful. A baseball game now typically ends before a normal, working (or school-attending) person's bedtime. A baseball game isn't much different in length than a basketball or hockey game or soccer match. It's the length it was, more-or-less, for most of history. Baseball is a normal sport again, not a marathon where half the audience falls asleep in the 7th inning, or just gives up because they have to go to work in six hours.

Not only is it shocking MLb did it but an MLB led by Manfred.  That is what really shocks me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Frobby said:

That’s what recordings are for.  

I've never been big on recordings, it's usually quiet enough by first pitch I can just pull the game up live on a laptop and be able to watch close enough to know what is going on.  If we play a weekday day game though I'll usually watch the replay later despite already knowing the result. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first game I attended with the new time/rules in April 2023, I walked in my door at 9:45.  The previous year, I was leaving a game in the top of the 6th inning at 9:30 because it was a work day.

At that game last year, the game was over by 9:00 and the O's won, a team with a bright future ahead of them.  Between the quicker game, the earlier start time, and an exciting team, I legitimately felt like I had baseball back in my life more deeply than it had been in years.  I feel the same way this year.  What a gift.

 

By the way, if anyone thinks that pitchers can't work this quick, watch two innings of Scott McGregor pitching in game 5 of the 1983 World Series.  I know he threw about 20 miles an hour slower than many of today's pitchers, but he would've laughed at a pitch clock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Gofannon said:

By the way, if anyone thinks that pitchers can't work this quick, watch two innings of Scott McGregor pitching in game 5 of the 1983 World Series.  I know he threw about 20 miles an hour slower than many of today's pitchers, but he would've laughed at a pitch clock.

My favorite thing about Keegan Akin is that he routinely throws his pitches with about 8 second left on the pitch timer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

My favorite thing about Keegan Akin is that he routinely throws his pitches with about 8 second left on the pitch timer.

I'm shocked his arm hasn't detached from his body pitching that quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a big fan of both as well with games now ending around 9 PM, still have time to do other stuff. 

Still not a fan of 4:05 start on Saturdays though I understand it from a fan at the game standpoint until it gets Africa hot in the summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I'm a big fan of both as well with games now ending around 9 PM, still have time to do other stuff. 

Still not a fan of 4:05 start on Saturdays though I understand it from a fan at the game standpoint until it gets Africa hot in the summer.

i love the 4PM.  I think when it gets to that Africa hot level heat, the difference b/w 4 and 7 isn't much anyway - its hot as hell either way.  Sure the seats in the sun are hotter, but you can prepare for that, and its not usually for the entire game.

And the pitch clock/635 first pitch combo is just awesome, I can't say enough positive things about it.  Last nights game - tense, well pitched, great atmosphere, and a W - and it all being completed by 9PM is a big cherry on top of that.  That same exact game, played under the old rules, ends at 10:30-11, and even w/ the good result, the feeling from the game is different, in a bad way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...