Jump to content

The 2024 Trade Deadline


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Grt 2BA FL Gator said:

From our recent past, I’m a fan of going and grabbing a Joe Saunders type or even Scott Feldman type. Both produced pretty well and didn’t cost too much.

Yeah, Feldman only cost us Arrieta and Strop.  Not much, considering we also got back Steve Clevenger.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Yeah, Feldman only cost us Arrieta and Strop.  Not much, considering we also got back Steve Clevenger.  

What were Arrieta and Strop doing here though?  Strop was out of options.  He was essentially that dude Valera that we DFA'd and the Diamondbacks picked up.  I don't hear anyone crying over him, yet...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sportsfan8703 said:

What were Arrieta and Strop doing here though?  Strop was out of options.  He was essentially that dude Valera that we DFA'd and the Diamondbacks picked up.  I don't hear anyone crying over him, yet...

I always liked Strop and was disappointed to lose him even though he’d been somewhat erratic.  I agree we hadn’t gotten anything out of Arrieta - that’s our fault, because he clearly had the talent.   I wasn’t against the trade at the time, but that’s because I didn’t realize just how badly we’d screwed up his development.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Could we swing a deal for Robert without giving up one of the big 3?  I think Robert's OBP would go up hitting in our lineup.  

Maybe we get Fedde and Robert for Cowser, EBJ, Norby, Stowers, and McDermott.  

I would guess if Kjerstad or Cowser are leading the package, you could get Robert.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Yeah, Feldman only cost us Arrieta and Strop.  Not much, considering we also got back Steve Clevenger.  

This is funny and sad at the same time.  I was just discussing with another O's fan what "The Calvary" could have been if we had the player development staff in place then that we do now.  I wonder how many guys had the talent in our system but were just never developed properly.  Arrieta had multiple seasons pitching as flat out stud after he got into the Cubs organization. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soto and Cole are going to be Free Agents after this year.  The Yankees are kind of pot committed to go for it this season.

The Sawx have 3 prospects in the top 25 and are only 4.5 GB.  Are they going to be passive this deadline?

We might have to trade 2 of the big 3 just to keep up.  Elias got lucky last year that he was in a division race with the Rays.  This year is going to be pricey.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I always liked Strop and was disappointed to lose him even though he’d been somewhat erratic.  I agree we hadn’t gotten anything out of Arrieta - that’s our fault, because he clearly had the talent.   I wasn’t against the trade at the time, but that’s because I didn’t realize just how badly we’d screwed up his development.  

Arrieta also had the calcified shoulder.  People are so scared of TJ, do they know how much of a miracle Arrieta's pitching health was? 

So we dealt away a pitcher that had never put things together given multiple opportunities that had a calcified shoulder. A reliever with poor command that was out of options.  

Hindsight 20/20 though. This is directed at all O's fans.  We sort of had to make that deal.  

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Arrieta also had the calcified shoulder.  People are so scared of TJ, do they know how much of a miracle Arrieta's pitching health was? 

So we dealt away a pitcher that had never put things together given multiple opportunities that had a calcified shoulder. A reliever with poor command that was out of options.  

Hindsight 20/20 though. This is directed at all O's fans.  We sort of had to make that deal.  

I know Bundy had a calcified shoulder.  Are you sure you don't have them confused?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I always liked Strop and was disappointed to lose him even though he’d been somewhat erratic.  I agree we hadn’t gotten anything out of Arrieta - that’s our fault, because he clearly had the talent.   I wasn’t against the trade at the time, but that’s because I didn’t realize just how badly we’d screwed up his development.  

That was the year we kept TJ McFarland on the roster all year as Rule 5. Impacted Strop. Strop really struggled and one time he went on the DL which I always wondered was a real injury or just a reset for him. He kept struggling and was out of options.  
 

Buck did a ton of good but his pitching coach issues really hurt the organization. I assumed Arrieta was the issue and not the development. I was wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

That was the year we kept TJ McFarland on the roster all year as Rule 5. Impacted Strop. Strop really struggled and one time he went on the DL which I always wondered was a real injury or just a reset for him. He kept struggling and was out of options.  
 

Buck did a ton of good but his pitching coach issues really hurt the organization. I assumed Arrieta was the issue and not the development. I was wrong. 

MacFarland was the better pitcher that year than Strop.  Heck, he was better than Arrieta that season.  Results matter and we were winning.  MacFarland is still pitching in year 12.  He'll likely get dealt for a prospect.  

We can criticize the Arrieta/Strop deal, but MacFarland isn't the one to pick on.  Arrieta had plenty of chances here.  We need a SP.  We were competing.  He went to a non competitive team that could deal with more growing pains.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pillar is tearing up lefties this year.

His sprint speed is still high and he had a good arm. OAA has him -1. uZR/UZR150 have him just over 0.

Basically, he’s around league average defensively.

Would prefer better but that’s good enough.  He makes sense and will cost very little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

MacFarland was the better pitcher that year than Strop.  Heck, he was better than Arrieta that season.  Results matter and we were winning.  MacFarland is still pitching in year 12.  He'll likely get dealt for a prospect.  

We can criticize the Arrieta/Strop deal, but MacFarland isn't the one to pick on.  Arrieta had plenty of chances here.  We need a SP.  We were competing.  He went to a non competitive team that could deal with more growing pains.  

He was but wasn’t someone that people generally had high hopes for. I think that pen lacked options for most if not all arms. That was a big issue.
 

 TJ to his credit has hung around a long time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The youngster has shown us glimpses of dominance, and then, the very next start he is awful. Into the 8th inning against the White Sox with 10 strikeouts and no walks, he pitched one of the best games of ANY Oriole starter this season. But the  start before, against the Dodgers, he was bombed, and the game AFTER his great performance against Chicago he was battered by the Red Sox. We could really use a series win with a good start b Povich against Detroit. But I'm done trying to figure this guy out. He can be great one start and horrible the next. What do you think will be his line on Sunday?
    • I'd give it to Burnes.  Great performance after the rough patch he went through.    
    • How can you even type the letters that spell that name?  If he were to become the coach, the entire team would participate in mandatory satanic rituals that include sacrificing children and the mutilation of newborn puppies. I heard from a reliable source that him, who we should not name, once bit the head off a baby kitten nun before going to bat and then mouth kissed the umpire who gave him an automatic home run. 
    • That's not true in the case of Chourio whatsoever, and using him as an example actually supports the point that those of us are making that are advocating for Mayo to get more playing time - that elite prospects need to play every day to get comfortable, and their teams need to let them struggle if need be. Chourio had a .558 OPS in April in 85 at bats, and he had .542 OPS in May in 65 at bats. He struggled mightily, but the Brewers gave him regular playing time and let him play through it. The precise thing the Orioles have failed to do with Mayo, Kjerstad, Norby, Cowser, Westburg, Ortiz, and Stowers. 
    • By the time Rutschman had 180 PA, his   OPS was well over .700.   Ditto Cowser.   Holliday at .524 is struggling way more than those two did.  He’s also several years younger, so maybe a longer adjustment period is to be expected.   But it’s still pretty disappointing that he’s not making much progress right now, after looking a little better when his second call-up started.   I don’t consider Mayo comparable.  He hasn’t even had 40 PA yet, and his playing time has been way more sporadic than Holliday’s.  He’s had a bad start but not enough PT to wonder why he hasn’t shown improvement yet.     
    • Mid 80s.   The problem was that I had no idea where it was going.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...