Jump to content

Wednesday, June 5: Orioles at Toronto


SteveA

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Morgan423 said:

Spoken like someone who didn't watch last season, as we slowly and steadily crept up on a team who was hotter than the surface of the sun the first two months, and bypassed them for the division.  

Different team.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, oriolediehard said:

MLB should put all the riches teams in their own division to make it fair.

I think MLB is not happy if the Yankees or the Redsox are not in the World Series.  They like the Dodgers and Mets and would be over joyed with a Subway series or a Yankees vs Dodgers series.  

They probably cringe when Tampa Bay or Arizona gets in.  What kind of national attention will they draw?  None.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, oriolediehard said:

MLB should put all the riches teams in their own division to make it fair.

MLB should do much more revenue sharing like the NFL does but that probably won’t happen either.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Philip said:

Different team.

 

Are you suggesting that on June 5th, 2023 when the Rays were 43-19 and we were 39-20 and 4.5 games back you knew the Rays weren't a good team?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how I feel about batted balls up the middle being 5-3 or 6-3 grounders or lineouts.  I guess something has to give if you're going to ban shifts but it still kind of feels bad.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Malike said:

Are you suggesting that on June 5th, 2023 when the Rays were 43-19 and we were 39-20 and 4.5 games back you knew the Rays weren't a good team?

Then they lost 3/5 of their rotation. If the Yankees rotation stays healthy they can avoid the Rays' fate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chavez Ravine said:

It closed out an era. Camden Yards opened a few years later.

New Cominsky Park also was a dud.   Camden put it to shame so much they have  been remodeling it off and on ever since.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Holliday went 1 for 2 with 3 walks on Friday night. 2024: .444 OBP, .911 OPS MiLB Career: .447 OBP, .931 OPS His OBP is EXACTLY what this O's team needs, would fill a key offensive weakness at 2nd base, help grind opposing pitching, and magnify the power up and down the lineup.  It's all dependent on his ability to throw and play 2B at a passable level. If Holliday starts to hit at the ML level, the question of who bats leadoff is over for the foreseeable future and we can go back to complaining about 1 slumping hitter or backup catcher at the bottom of the lineup.
    • This. We literally have no lineup holes right now, and Mayo, Norby, Jax lurk. Any trade discussion should center around the four most essential and crucial elements to O's success for the balance of the regular season and playoffs: 1. pitching 2. pitching 3. pitching 4. damn, forgot the 4th one. oh yeah, its pitching.
    • All I know is that Suárez has earned at least one more start, after today.
    • Scherzer still looks like a guy who would be a nice add to our rotation in the second half if the Rangers are sellers. 
    • Not happening. I don’t disagree, but Kremer will be slotted in the rotation.
    • I wouldn’t either but the word here is that he’s going back to rotation . Suarez supposedly the one  to be moved to bullpen . I think they should wait and see if Irvin can rebound . If Irvin can’t match Suarez’s work, then he should be moved to bullpen 
    • Yes that’s what I was asking. COC was completely off base in his comment. Judge is a great player, and apparently a nice guy. I have nothing against him, or most Yankees, for that matter, though Gil’s tats are off putting. I am expecting a bit of pro Yankee bias, but that’s ok. Also, home runs is a very glittery stat, and might sway some folks. But it should be Gunnar, at least based on the first 81.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...