Jump to content

I don’t know if I’ve ever seen this team as patient as today


Frobby

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Watching this game today, I was amazed by the Orioles’ patience and perseverance at the plate.   Taj Bradley had great stuff today, and be was pounding the strike zone, but batter after batter showed great strike zone judgment and spoiled a ton of pitches.  Through 4 innings, despite only getting a few runners on base, they’d forced Bradley to throw 87 pitches in only 16 batters.  12 of the 16 batters saw a minimum of 5 pitches.  They let up on him in the 5th (which was his last inning anyway), but went right back to work on the bullpen: 23 pitches vs. Armstrong in the 6th, 28 pitches vs. Poche in the 7th, 20 pitches off Adam in the 8th, 36 pitches off Maton and Kelly in the 9th.   All in all, 206 pitches seen.   That was outstanding.  
 

By "this team" you mean the 2024 Orioles, right?  Because the Orioles teams of our shared youth bludgeoned their opponents with patience.

That said, the ability to roll up Bradley's pitch count was key to the win today and we saw lots of good 2-strike extension, I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Watching this game today, I was amazed by the Orioles’ patience and perseverance at the plate.   Taj Bradley had great stuff today, and be was pounding the strike zone, but batter after batter showed great strike zone judgment and spoiled a ton of pitches.  Through 4 innings, despite only getting a few runners on base, they’d forced Bradley to throw 87 pitches in only 16 batters.  12 of the 16 batters saw a minimum of 5 pitches.  They let up on him in the 5th (which was his last inning anyway), but went right back to work on the bullpen: 23 pitches vs. Armstrong in the 6th, 28 pitches vs. Poche in the 7th, 20 pitches off Adam in the 8th, 36 pitches off Maton and Kelly in the 9th.   All in all, 206 pitches seen.   That was outstanding.  
 

The very KEY to the game was getting Bradley out of there at 99 pitches...that was because they were patient and worked counts , something they have rarely done all year...they need to do more of this. I was also impressed with how they did that with the other pitchers too...I still think though, that they seem to "wait" to score late in games...I'd rather to find a way to score , say in the 4th of 5th inning instead of the 9th or 8th...and put more pressure on the other team...but Ill take it every time..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Bradley had the benefit of some very generous calls on the right side of the plate (looking from the mound).  It's difficult to be patient knowing that there were an extra 5 inches of strike zone out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roy Firestone said:

The very KEY to the game was getting Bradley out of there at 99 pitches...that was because they were patient and worked counts , something they have rarely done all year...they need to do more of this. I was also impressed with how they did that with the other pitchers too...I still think though, that they seem to "wait" to score late in games...I'd rather to find a way to score , say in the 4th of 5th inning instead of the 9th or 8th...and put more pressure on the other team...but Ill take it every time..

Roy , I love you, but they dont wait (their good but not that good) what they do is(today anyway) is let the game come to them. Many time the Starter might be the best pitcher they face (unless ts their closer) Keep the game close, get into their BP, sample multiple arms and be ready to pounce which the last 2 Years they have gotten pretty good at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles had sunk to last in the AL in walks drawn.  Since then they've had multiple games of 4, 5, or 6 walks.  Hopefully this trend continues.

Gunnar Henderson has led the charge; he's drawn 9 walks in his last 9 games and 18 walks in his last 17 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Filmstudy said:

By "this team" you mean the 2024 Orioles, right? 

Yes, that’s what I meant.   In any event, pitch count stats aren’t available before 1988.  I have no idea how many pitches the O’s were seeing in 1970. They did take 717 walks though.  That’s 89 more than the MLB-leading Dodgers are on pace to draw this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The old clique is that baseball is a game of adjustments. Given the variations in the strike zone umpire to umpire, the ability of each pitcher to throw strikes, the general environment for hitting (ballpark, temperature, time of day) I am not surprised to see significant variability in patience. This is a young team that seems to be getting better as the season progresses. You have to like the trend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess fouling off helped as yesterday they were still bottom half of the league in O-Swing%

Whatever their style they seem solid as a Top 3 MLB offense with perhaps at least a couple future All-Stars pursuing their life mastery of the game of baseball as best they can in the high minors.

Certainly Mullins' scuffles are amplified by the alternative of giving Heston Kjerstad a decent audition to inform whether or not you should use him against Luis Gil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Yossarian said:

And Bradley had the benefit of some very generous calls on the right side of the plate (looking from the mound).  It's difficult to be patient knowing that there were an extra 5 inches of strike zone out there. 

The upper top corner of the zone  looking from the Pitchers side was where the ump would not call strikes for Bradish too.   Pitch after pitch put right there was called a ball, but superior talent finally won out     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 25 Nuggets said:

Gunnar Henderson has led the charge; he's drawn 9 walks in his last 9 games and 18 walks in his last 17 games.

Yes, but they are also pitching around him sometimes, not quite an intentional walk but we are not giving you anything to hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

Yes, that’s what I meant.   In any event, pitch count stats aren’t available before 1988.  I have no idea how many pitches the O’s were seeing in 1970. They did take 717 walks though.  That’s 89 more than the MLB-leading Dodgers are on pace to draw this year.  

During the 18 consecutive winning seasons from 1968-85, the one constant was that the Orioles outdrew their opponents every single season and by an average of 123 walks per year.

Even the good offensive teams of 1996-97, 2012-16 and now pale in comparison in terms of plate discipline.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Roy Firestone said:

The very KEY to the game was getting Bradley out of there at 99 pitches...that was because they were patient and worked counts , something they have rarely done all year...they need to do more of this. I was also impressed with how they did that with the other pitchers too...I still think though, that they seem to "wait" to score late in games...I'd rather to find a way to score , say in the 4th of 5th inning instead of the 9th or 8th...and put more pressure on the other team...but Ill take it every time..

It’s pretty clear they flipped a switch after the Cardinals series.  They have been selective since then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, baltfan said:

It’s pretty clear they flipped a switch after the Cardinals series.  They have been selective since then. 

I hope so. The previous approach was not sustainable. I'm glad to see they're adjusting and I hope it continues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...